Didn't lose any weight from walking
fearluna
Posts: 61 Member
I went to London for two weeks and I walked to whole time. from Jan 25, to jan 31 I walked a total of 53 miles about 7.60 miles per day. I had eaten about one small lunch and then i had some rather unhealthy dinners like fish and chips with a beer but that was it for the day. I figured going unhealthy woudlnt hurt since Id burn it off anyway but when I returned back home. I seemed to gained weight. anyone know why? (about 4 pounds)
0
Replies
-
Walking has nothing to do with it. It's calories in. Calories out. You didn't walk enough to burn off the fish and chips.0
-
It's unlikely you ate enough to gain 4 pounds in a week. If you don't usually walk that much, you are probably retaining water. In general though, walking doesn't really burn that many calories...I walk 2.5 miles a day and it only gives me 135 extra calories. It's possible you still overate and some of it is fat, but I highly doubt most of it is.0
-
Oh, and eating out a lot likely means you ate a bunch of sodium....which also causes water retention0
-
Calories
Salt
Travel
So if your calories in exceeded your calories out you probably increased fat
If your sodium and carb intake shot up probably water weight
If the walking is unusual for you probably water weight
If you flew water weight
Give it a couple of weeks weigh again and you'll know whether it was water weight or some fat gain
To be honest though for fat gain you'd have had to eat around 14000 calories over maintenance which I imagine was hard to do so I would almost bet water weight0 -
I hate to rain on the vacation parade, those unhealthy dinners ... fish and chips and beer have a lot more calories than you think..
The walking around did not do much but give you some extra "steps"... There is some calories your body gave you, but an actual steady state calorie burn for a period of expended energy and heart rate, NO... and not enough calories to do any off setting when you clearly over ate your maintenance calories each day.
0 -
Walking just doesn't do it for me. I got a Fitbit One as part of a wellness program with my health insurance company in 2014. I got 10,000 or more steps per day (about five miles per day) every single day for over two years and I actually gained 20 pounds (of fat, not muscle...). Granted, I was not eating right at all. But even using the calorie indicator on the Fitbit when I walked showed that it didn't burn a ton more calories for me than sitting around (realizing that is only a rough indicator, at best). Of course that will vary with pace, hills, and so forth.
Also, fish and chips are fried and since joining MFP I have learned just how many calories are in butter, oil, etc. That could be adding more than you know. And it is hard to guess when eating out how much oil was used in the cooking process. (At home, if I fry something, I pour the oil left over in the pan back out into a measuring cup and subtract to see how much was absorbed by my food. But you can't do that at a restaurant...)
The other thing to factor in is that travel causes people to retain water. I am not sure how far you traveled to get to London. If it involved air travel, some of those pounds could simply be from water. I would give it a little time.0 -
I hate to rain on the vacation parade, those unhealthy dinners ... fish and chips and beer have a lot more calories than you think..
The walking around did not do much but give you some extra "steps"... There is some calories your body gave you, but an actual steady state calorie burn for a period of expended energy and heart rate, NO... and not enough calories to do any off setting when you clearly over ate your maintenance calories each day.
I disagree with that actually
7 miles walking would give me about 500 calories on top of my regular day
0 -
I hate to rain on the vacation parade, those unhealthy dinners ... fish and chips and beer have a lot more calories than you think..
The walking around did not do much but give you some extra "steps"... There is some calories your body gave you, but an actual steady state calorie burn for a period of expended energy and heart rate, NO... and not enough calories to do any off setting when you clearly over ate your maintenance calories each day.
I dont know that she "clearly over ate maintenance." I don't think she'll know how much is fat gain (if any) until the water weight dissipates. Rabbit and I both gave reasons her body would be retaining water--I didn't think about travel, so I'm glad Rabbit did. I mean, she may have overate a bit but definitely not 4 pounds in one week.0 -
Well it depends on the walking. Walking is a broad term. It can mean slowly strolling or race walking or somewhere in between.0
-
I think it is more about heart rate. If you were walking but not really elevating your heart rate you wouldn't be burning that many extra calories. The key for me is to get my heart rate up, then I know I am burning more calories. Strolling around London all day was a lot of steps but not really considered a cardio workout.0
-
I think it is more about heart rate. If you were walking but not really elevating your heart rate you wouldn't be burning that many extra calories. The key for me is to get my heart rate up, then I know I am burning more calories. Strolling around London all day was a lot of steps but not really considered a cardio workout.
right, but it still burns calories and chances are, she's not used to walking that much (by the sound of the post) so her body is likely retaining water from it.0 -
Yes retaining water for sure but fish and chips and beer have a lot more calories than you would burn from walking0
-
singingflutelady wrote: »Yes retaining water for sure but fish and chips and beer have a lot more calories than you would burn from walking
They also have a ridiculous amount of salt, plus alcohol dehydrates you. She did not gain 4 pounds of fat. Some of it might be fat, but most of it will be water.0 -
Actually your heart rate does not need to go up substantially to burn calories, the steps alone, even if ambling along count
I think there may be a confusion between exercise for cardiovascular health and increasing activity level for calorie burn
Might be best to think of it as increased activity
If someone sedentary becomes highly active their TDEE goes up ..from 1.2x BMR to 1.6 to 1.8 X BMR (my BMR is around 1450 so at sedentary which is about 2 miles of steps I'd get 300 calories on top of my BMR but at moderately active I'd get another 5-600 calories)0 -
I do agree with that. Just pointing out that she wasn't in a deficit probably as she assumed she was0
-
DanyellMcGinnis wrote: »Walking just doesn't do it for me. I got a Fitbit One as part of a wellness program with my health insurance company in 2014. I got 10,000 or more steps per day (about five miles per day) every single day for over two years and I actually gained 20 pounds (of fat, not muscle...). Granted, I was not eating right at all.
Then it's not the walking, it was your eating habits. There are no buts. Walking is great for most people who want to lose weight because it's an exercise almost anyone can do. The calorie burn you get from it depends on a multitude of factors, but walking a magical 10000 steps does not guarantee an immense amount of weight loss. Walking five miles can easily be canceled out with a snack.
Some people assume that walking gives them leeway to eat a bunch more then they act shocked when they maintain or even gain weight. My 15000 steps daily only gives me a few hundred extra to play with depending on the duration and the intensity. I'm 5'3" and 113 pounds and the other day I earned around 900 extra calories for 31000 steps. However, I walked at a rate of 4 mph most of the time and I have a Charge HR so my heart rate was measured the whole time.0 -
You're probably talking 1200-1600 for fish and chips and 180 for a pint of lager0
-
On a recent vacation I took, I gained 5 pounds in the week away and lost those 5 pounds in the first week home. Vacations are hard to "read". Just get back on track and continue with life. Did ya have fun?0
-
tara_means_star wrote: »singingflutelady wrote: »Yes retaining water for sure but fish and chips and beer have a lot more calories than you would burn from walking
They also have a ridiculous amount of salt, plus alcohol dehydrates you. She did not gain 4 pounds of fat. Some of it might be fat, but most of it will be water.
This0 -
DanyellMcGinnis wrote: »Walking just doesn't do it for me. I got a Fitbit One as part of a wellness program with my health insurance company in 2014. I got 10,000 or more steps per day (about five miles per day) every single day for over two years and I actually gained 20 pounds (of fat, not muscle...). Granted, I was not eating right at all.
Then it's not the walking, it was your eating habits. There are no buts. Walking is great for most people who want to lose weight because it's an exercise almost anyone can do. The calorie burn you get from it depends on a multitude of factors, but walking a magical 10000 steps does not guarantee an immense amount of weight loss. Walking five miles can easily be canceled out with a snack.
Some people assume that walking gives them leeway to eat a bunch more then they act shocked when they maintain or even gain weight. My 15000 steps daily only gives me a few hundred extra to play with depending on the duration and the intensity. I'm 5'3" and 113 pounds and the other day I earned around 900 extra calories for 31000 steps. However, I walked at a rate of 4 mph most of the time and I have a Charge HR so my heart rate was measured the whole time.
Exactly. The big reason walking works for many is because it is one of the few exercises that doesn't typically leave you hungry afterwards so many people don't cancel out the walking with a snack, but that doesn't mean everyone skips the extra food.0 -
singingflutelady wrote: »Well it depends on the walking. Walking is a broad term. It can mean slowly strolling or race walking or somewhere in between.
FWIW, pace doesn't impact calorie burn that much for me. Online calculators give me about 300 kcal for 4 miles--slightly more when running 8 min miles than walking 12 min miles, but honestly, about the same. My fitbit charge HR gives me more calories for a slower pace. All I can figure is 4 mi take longer at the slower pace, so I'm getting the benefit of baseline burn that would have happened anyway. It's weird, and a bit discouraging as running is considerably more effort.
ETA: When I walk extra slow, with HR registering "out of range" (not "fat burning" or "cardio" for the whole duration), I get the most calories burned of all. Very odd.0 -
I'd like to mention again, that even though I ate fish and chips and a beer, It was basically my only meal that day. i had some toast for breakfast or a meal bar but that was it a day.0
-
"I ate fish and chips and beer every day for 2 weeks and don't understand why I gained weight." You have answered your own question.0
-
I'd like to mention again, that even though I ate fish and chips and a beer, It was basically my only meal that day. i had some toast for breakfast or a meal bar but that was it a day.
How many slices what did you have on it
Drinks?
How many calories in meal bar
I still think,it's mainly water weight0 -
-
-
I'd like to mention again, that even though I ate fish and chips and a beer, It was basically my only meal that day. i had some toast for breakfast or a meal bar but that was it a day.
How many slices what did you have on it
Drinks?
How many calories in meal bar
I still think,it's mainly water weight
two slices butter and jelly.
190 in the bar
i drink mostly water but had tea and skinny lattes too0 -
I'd like to mention again, that even though I ate fish and chips and a beer, It was basically my only meal that day. i had some toast for breakfast or a meal bar but that was it a day.
How many slices what did you have on it
Drinks?
How many calories in meal bar
I still think,it's mainly water weight
two slices butter and jelly.
190 in the bar
i drink mostly water but had tea and skinny lattes too
In all honesty, you may have eaten at maintenance, you may have gone over a little bit. You didn't likely go over 4 pounds worth. Most of that is water weight. Give it a week or two, weigh again.0 -
tara_means_star wrote: »I'd like to mention again, that even though I ate fish and chips and a beer, It was basically my only meal that day. i had some toast for breakfast or a meal bar but that was it a day.
How many slices what did you have on it
Drinks?
How many calories in meal bar
I still think,it's mainly water weight
two slices butter and jelly.
190 in the bar
i drink mostly water but had tea and skinny lattes too
In all honesty, you may have eaten at maintenance, you may have gone over a little bit. You didn't likely go over 4 pounds worth. Most of that is water weight. Give it a week or two, weigh again.
Okay, I will. I just find it strange because I cant imagine one meal a day with all the walking can make me gain weight. But it might have been all the salt. I didnt drink as much water as a should have either because water wasnt free there, ya know?
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions