Question on my calories

lisaisso
lisaisso Posts: 337 Member
edited March 2016 in Health and Weight Loss
I'm a female, 5'9 @ 251lb, 37 y/o. I've been logging since January and total loss is 12.2lb so far. Exercise is not consistent, but staying around my daily 1620 calories is. Trouble is the weight loss has stalled, I got a food scale and have been weighing my proteins. What I WANT to do is adjust my calories lower to get results- doing the IIFYM and Scooby calc my TDEE is roughly 2200- but I'm not sure if lowering is the healthy answer... Right now I'm set for a 1.5 loss/week. Kinda befuddled :) thoughts anyone?
Tell me to trust the process and weight loss isn't linear and I'm overreacting lol

Replies

  • kommodevaran
    kommodevaran Posts: 17,890 Member
    http://www.myfitnesspal.com/tools/bmr-calculator estimates your BMR to 1853. Don't go under that. You are probably eating more than you think. Why don't you weigh ALL your food?
  • StealthHealth
    StealthHealth Posts: 2,417 Member
    lisaisso wrote: »
    I got a food scale and have been weighing my proteins.

    you need to weigh everything, and measure liquids.
    lisaisso wrote: »
    Trouble is the weight loss has stalled

    for how long?

  • CurlyCockney
    CurlyCockney Posts: 1,394 Member
    Everything has calories, not just protein. Weigh all your food, measure all your drinks, and see what your real intake is.
  • jennayoung1109
    jennayoung1109 Posts: 7 Member
    I'm new to the IIFYM as well and have actually just hired a nutrition coach to make sure I'm doing things correctly. I do know, however, that you need to measure fats, proteins, and carbs, not just proteins. You can google a macro calculator and it will tell you how many grams of each macro you need based on your weight, height, and activity level. That's just a place to start. I don't know all the ins and outs of it yet, but definitely need to weigh all macros, not just protein.
  • lisaisso
    lisaisso Posts: 337 Member
    Stalled about 2 weeks!

    Honestly I don't weigh it all bc I think it would get too messy, just an excuse I realized. I'll make an effort to weigh more today :neutral:

    I think you're right that I'm eating more than I think, obvi... so should I adjust my goal from 1.5 to 1 lb a week? That'll put me around 1870 for the day.
  • lisaisso
    lisaisso Posts: 337 Member
    edited March 2016
    And I've been measuring other things, like vegetables and sides, just not weighing on the food scale. Guess I'll dial in more!
  • CurlyCockney
    CurlyCockney Posts: 1,394 Member
    Put pot on scale, tare, add raw ingredient, log, cook. No mess! Or, put plate on scale, tare, add cooked ingredient, log, eat. No mess!

    Personally, I wouldn't tweak my calorie allowance until I was as sure as I could be about what I was eating.
  • lisaisso
    lisaisso Posts: 337 Member
    http://www.myfitnesspal.com/tools/bmr-calculator estimates your BMR to 1853. Don't go under that. You are probably eating more than you think. Why don't you weigh ALL your food?

    So even if MFP says to go under BMR, we shouldn't? I have roughly 60lb more to lose before reevaluation.
  • erickirb
    erickirb Posts: 12,294 Member
    If you have a lot to lose there is not issue eating under BMR. I would keep it at 1.5 lbs/week and eat back half your exercise calories. As for stalling, weight loss is not linear. I would suggest doing a 4 week rolling average instead of one week vs. previous. there are many reasons for stalling weight, the most popular is water retention. this can be from higher sodium, increased exercise, that time of the month, etc.
  • lisaisso
    lisaisso Posts: 337 Member
    And thank you sincerely all for your input <3
  • lisaisso
    lisaisso Posts: 337 Member
    edited March 2016
    Put pot on scale, tare, add raw ingredient, log, cook. No mess! Or, put plate on scale, tare, add cooked ingredient, log, eat. No mess!

    Personally, I wouldn't tweak my calorie allowance until I was as sure as I could be about what I was eating.

    Thanks! You make it sound so clean! Hahaha
  • lisaisso
    lisaisso Posts: 337 Member
    erickirb wrote: »
    If you have a lot to lose there is not issue eating under BMR. I would keep it at 1.5 lbs/week and eat back half your exercise calories. As for stalling, weight loss is not linear. I would suggest doing a 4 week rolling average instead of one week vs. previous. there are many reasons for stalling weight, the most popular is water retention. this can be from higher sodium, increased exercise, that time of the month, etc.

    Gotcha... that's what I thought.
  • jkal1979
    jkal1979 Posts: 1,896 Member
    lisaisso wrote: »
    Stalled about 2 weeks!

    Honestly I don't weigh it all bc I think it would get too messy, just an excuse I realized. I'll make an effort to weigh more today :neutral:

    I think you're right that I'm eating more than I think, obvi... so should I adjust my goal from 1.5 to 1 lb a week? That'll put me around 1870 for the day.

    Why would it get too messy? Put a plate or bowl on the scale, tare it, and add your food. If you are putting more than one item on the plate, just tare it again and weigh it. Repeat as necessary.

    Along with the food scale, make sure that you are using accurate food entries in the database. That means no entries labeled 'generic' or 'homemade'.

    http://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/1234699/logging-accurately-step-by-step-guide/p1
  • kommodevaran
    kommodevaran Posts: 17,890 Member
    edited March 2016
    Personally, I wouldn't tweak my calorie allowance until I was as sure as I could be about what I was eating.
    Exactly this was what I meant :)

    lisaisso wrote: »
    http://www.myfitnesspal.com/tools/bmr-calculator estimates your BMR to 1853. Don't go under that. You are probably eating more than you think. Why don't you weigh ALL your food?

    So even if MFP says to go under BMR, we shouldn't? I have roughly 60lb more to lose before reevaluation.
    lisaisso wrote: »
    I think you're right that I'm eating more than I think, obvi... so should I adjust my goal from 1.5 to 1 lb a week? That'll put me around 1870 for the day.
    The calculators just give you an estimation, but this will get you to the ballpark. The calculation is based on averages of the population. If your fat% is high, your real BMR will be a bit lower (and it's just a rule of thumb anyway, but rules of thumb are often useful). You have to measure your intake and your weight accurately for some time to see how much you burn. It's quite important that you don't eat too little and crash, but you don't want to spin your wheels, either.
    I forgot to put the other part in:
    If you have 75+ lbs to lose 2 lbs/week is ideal,
    If you have 40-75 lbs to lose 1.5 lbs/week is ideal,
    If you have 25-40 lbs to lose 1 lbs/week is ideal,
    If you have 15 -25 lbs to lose 0.5 to 1.0 lbs/week is ideal, and
    If you have less than 15 lbs to lose 0.5 lbs/week is ideal.
  • lisaisso
    lisaisso Posts: 337 Member
    jkal1979 wrote: »
    lisaisso wrote: »
    Stalled about 2 weeks!

    Honestly I don't weigh it all bc I think it would get too messy, just an excuse I realized. I'll make an effort to weigh more today :neutral:

    I think you're right that I'm eating more than I think, obvi... so should I adjust my goal from 1.5 to 1 lb a week? That'll put me around 1870 for the day.

    Why would it get too messy? Put a plate or bowl on the scale, tare it, and add your food. If you are putting more than one item on the plate, just tare it again and weigh it. Repeat as necessary.

    Along with the food scale, make sure that you are using accurate food entries in the database. That means no entries labeled 'generic' or 'homemade'.

    http://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/1234699/logging-accurately-step-by-step-guide/p1

    Thanks for the link!
  • lisaisso
    lisaisso Posts: 337 Member
    Personally, I wouldn't tweak my calorie allowance until I was as sure as I could be about what I was eating.
    Exactly this was what I meant :)

    lisaisso wrote: »
    http://www.myfitnesspal.com/tools/bmr-calculator estimates your BMR to 1853. Don't go under that. You are probably eating more than you think. Why don't you weigh ALL your food?

    So even if MFP says to go under BMR, we shouldn't? I have roughly 60lb more to lose before reevaluation.
    lisaisso wrote: »
    I think you're right that I'm eating more than I think, obvi... so should I adjust my goal from 1.5 to 1 lb a week? That'll put me around 1870 for the day.
    The calculators just give you an estimation, but this will get you to the ballpark. The calculation is based on averages of the population. If your fat% is high, your real BMR will be a bit lower (and it's just a rule of thumb anyway, but rules of thumb are often useful). You have to measure your intake and your weight accurately for some time to see how much you burn. It's quite important that you don't eat too little and crash, but you don't want to spin your wheels, either.
    I forgot to put the other part in:
    If you have 75+ lbs to lose 2 lbs/week is ideal,
    If you have 40-75 lbs to lose 1.5 lbs/week is ideal,
    If you have 25-40 lbs to lose 1 lbs/week is ideal,
    If you have 15 -25 lbs to lose 0.5 to 1.0 lbs/week is ideal, and
    If you have less than 15 lbs to lose 0.5 lbs/week is ideal.

    Ok awesome, so my 1.5 goal is spot on :smiley: thanks so much!
  • SezxyStef
    SezxyStef Posts: 15,268 Member
    I wouldn't worry too much about 2 weeks...you could be retaining water due to TOM or sodium or stress etc.

    As for Stall do you mean no loss or it's slowed?1gi20dpvi569.jpg
  • size102b
    size102b Posts: 1,370 Member
    If you don't weight Everything you'll not lose weight even vegetables have calories
    Fruit is high in some cases a banana is 120 calories
    Rice pasta are high in calories
    Drinks can be very high
    It won't work unless your 100% honest with yourself
    Weigh anything that you eat or drink if it's not obviously calorie worked out
  • StaciMarie1974
    StaciMarie1974 Posts: 4,138 Member
    Assuming 2200 is an accurate TDEE, 2200-1620=580, so you're due for a little over 1 pound per week. You could probably cut your cals a little lower, but personally I would not go below 1400-1500. You need to eat enough to feel satisfied, have energy, feel satiated.

    ~12 pounds in 2 months is very good. When you say you've stalled, I assume you mean over the past 1-3 weeks? You won't lose weight every week. Your body is making progress if you're continually eating at a deficit, but the scale won't always show it. Why? Because various factors like sodium, stress, sleep cycle changes, sore muscles, TOM/hormones can cause temporary water weight. The water weight can make it hard to see the results on the scale. But its temporary - so keep going, trust the science, and in time the scale will move downward again.
    lisaisso wrote: »
    I'm a female, 5'9 @ 251lb, 37 y/o. I've been logging since January and total loss is 12.2lb so far. Exercise is not consistent, but staying around my daily 1620 calories is. Trouble is the weight loss has stalled, I got a food scale and have been weighing my proteins. What I WANT to do is adjust my calories lower to get results- doing the IIFYM and Scooby calc my TDEE is roughly 2200- but I'm not sure if lowering is the healthy answer... Right now I'm set for a 1.5 loss/week. Kinda befuddled :) thoughts anyone?
    Tell me to trust the process and weight loss isn't linear and I'm overreacting lol

  • lisaisso
    lisaisso Posts: 337 Member
    Thank you all :#
  • coreyreichle
    coreyreichle Posts: 1,031 Member
    lisaisso wrote: »
    http://www.myfitnesspal.com/tools/bmr-calculator estimates your BMR to 1853. Don't go under that. You are probably eating more than you think. Why don't you weigh ALL your food?

    So even if MFP says to go under BMR, we shouldn't? I have roughly 60lb more to lose before reevaluation.

    You can go under your BMR... Nothing wrong with that. Just not your overall deficit from your TDEE.

    My BMR is ~1830 or so. My calorie goal is 1800.
  • lisaisso
    lisaisso Posts: 337 Member
    I just wanted to update that 1. I weighed and measured everything yesterday and I felt that it was very doable. And 2. The scale moved for me this morning (too soon for a direct correlation, but I now know that I'm doing what I need to do, to get results. B)