What's the big deal about carbs?!

e_v_v
e_v_v Posts: 131 Member
edited November 30 in Food and Nutrition
So many people seem to go "low-carb" when they diet and rave about its results. I thought it came down to calories in vs. out. So why go low-carb if you're tracking calories on MFP? I don't see the point of cutting out all carbs if they're something your body craves for energy. Is there proof that a low-carb diet makes you lose more weight than a carb-included diet if the daily calorie intakes are the same?
«1

Replies

  • LKArgh
    LKArgh Posts: 5,178 Member
    edited April 2016
    Because it is the latest fashion. At least it is not a dangerous one for most people. And there might be even some health benefits for some people.
  • dopeysmelly
    dopeysmelly Posts: 1,390 Member
    If I recall correctly, over time studies suggest that it all evens out. Having said that, if folks find a way that works for them, I'm all for it. Low-carb sounds like a recipe for indigestion and constipation for me personally
  • Afura
    Afura Posts: 2,054 Member
    I think you see a good amount of success with it because you're pulling out a potentially calorie heavy source and replacing it with a less calorie heavy source IE 2 slices of white bread for a cup of broccoli. I was low carb for awhile and when I finally turned the corner into being a diabetic, the nutritionist actually upped my carbs and I had a heck of a time meeting that goal. I never truly felt better or worse being low carb/GF/kinda paleo (not giving up my cheese), and found it more difficult trying to find a replacement for bread (Whole Food's has a bread that isn't bad, but still needs to be toasted or it's garbage).
  • gember85
    gember85 Posts: 114 Member
    I love carbs and eat with every meal, i chose the better ones like wholemeal bread over white etc I've lost 4 stone eating them x
  • snowflake954
    snowflake954 Posts: 8,399 Member
    I have a hard time understanding it too. I live in Italy where people eat pasta, pizza and risotto and are thin. However, low-carbers are really convinced and it's no skin off my nose. If they can do it and afford it, more power to them.
  • arditarose
    arditarose Posts: 15,573 Member
    I need to go lowish carb to get into a deficit and keep my protein high. I also prefer to eat high volume, so most of my carbs come from fruits and vegetables.
  • cwolfman13
    cwolfman13 Posts: 41,865 Member
    ebrass73 wrote: »
    So many people seem to go "low-carb" when they diet and rave about its results. I thought it came down to calories in vs. out. So why go low-carb if you're tracking calories on MFP? I don't see the point of cutting out all carbs if they're something your body craves for energy. Is there proof that a low-carb diet makes you lose more weight than a carb-included diet if the daily calorie intakes are the same?

    Because carbs are the most recent of dietary demons as per what the industry at large is pushing at the moment.

    A low carb diet will actually result in faster weight loss initially...but you lose a ton of water. Study after study indicates that over time, it's exactly the same as any other diet.
  • Need2Exerc1se
    Need2Exerc1se Posts: 13,575 Member
    I think there are many reasons.

    You will likely see quicker results from water loss.
    It's easy to achieve a deficit if you cut out a large group of foods.
    It can help control blood glucose levels for diabetics
    It's popular
    Some celebrity said it was good
    It worked for a friend
    ...
  • TeaBea
    TeaBea Posts: 14,517 Member
    edited April 2016
    Misinformation - I know people who swear by it. One gal (she has 5 pounds to lose, every so often). "It's the only thing that works for me." She doesn't consider the water weight loss factor.......so losing water weight plus 1/2 pound of fat the first week looks like more progress, than just losing 1/2 pound of fat.

    Ease of counting - you have 3 macros - if you cut out one - you can lose weight. I could see the popularity of this when counting calories was a major pain. Old school.....you had a book with calorie counts (before food labels required anything you looked up every single thing)......then you measured out your portion.....and wrote it down in a note book. Then you had to add up these numbers. AND people complain about counting calories now?

    Extremes - more of something (or less of it in this case) is always better. If someone eats too many carbs.....would a moderate carb approach work for weight loss? Very likely it would. But, would very low carb work better? Okay, let's say it may work better, but they don't always consider that weight loss is just step one.

    Then you have those who genuinely benefit (medically) from reducing carbs. For them, lower (or moderate) carbs should be a lifestyle change.
  • yarwell
    yarwell Posts: 10,477 Member
    In about 28 studies (from memory) low carb gave either better or the same result in terms of weight loss. Google will find a list.

    People that "crave carbs for energy" wouldn't go low carb but someone who likes rich foods with plenty of fat might prefer it. MFP can of course be used to track carbs as well as calories.
  • Afura
    Afura Posts: 2,054 Member
    Some celebrity said it was good
    Oprah said eat bread.

  • Sawjer
    Sawjer Posts: 229 Member
    Carbs are amazing, love them. Fit them into your macro's and eat the healthier type! Carbs is better to cut out of your diet gradually if you want that shredded look, but you cant get that last look if you deprive your body instantly, where as if you cut it out whilst cutting, it will take you over the finishing line cutting them out later.
  • fishshark
    fishshark Posts: 1,886 Member
    i love carbs... potatoes, rice, pasta, bread i eat them all one usually with every meal
  • amusedmonkey
    amusedmonkey Posts: 10,330 Member
    No real deal there if you're healthy. They're just trendy, like low fat was at some point. Low fat had the studies, the "clear skin" anecdotes, the "best thing to combat hunger" claims, the whole package. If low carb becomes mainstream in the medical community and governments start basing their recommendations on it, it will automatically become uncool and people will start looking for the next big thing that makes them feel good they aren't mainstream, or follow a rehashed diet from the 80s because a shiny book cover touts it as revolutionary.

    Some people follow low car because it agrees with their preferences, some because it helps them manage diabetes or somesuch, but the vast majority follow it because internet said so, so it must be true.
  • Need2Exerc1se
    Need2Exerc1se Posts: 13,575 Member
    Afura wrote: »
    Some celebrity said it was good
    Oprah said eat bread.

    Oprah is overweight. Just sayin'
  • wilsoncl6
    wilsoncl6 Posts: 1,280 Member
    The benefit of going low carb is that it takes longer for your body to break down proteins for energy and you fill fuller longer than you would eating the carbs that the protein replaces. It's not really sustainable as a dietary regimen as it will generally leave you tired and cranky a lot and makes it harder to get all of the vitamins and nutrients you need. Another benefit of it is that with a high protein/low card diet, you body will break down less muscle during your weight loss as you already have a high level of protein in your blood to utilize. You can't really sustain a decent exercise routine on this kind of eating regimen (dependent upon how intense your workouts are) because carbs are your go to supply for your bodies energy needs.
  • Hornsby
    Hornsby Posts: 10,322 Member
    Cause it works for some and they prefer it. Nothing wrong with that. Yes, it comes down to calories in and calories out but now you get to a deficit is highly preference. Then there are folks with medical issues that need to go low carb.
  • melissabatmcnet
    melissabatmcnet Posts: 24 Member
    I do a low carb Diet because of my diabetes and trying to keep sugars down. Eating carbs for me is like eating candy, my sugars go up for both.. I would like to lose 40 pounds and it is so difficult with my diabetes, thyroid and Rituxan for follicular non hogkin lymphoma..
  • amusedmonkey
    amusedmonkey Posts: 10,330 Member
    Hornsby wrote: »
    Cause it works for some and they prefer it. Nothing wrong with that. Yes, it comes down to calories in and calories out but now you get to a deficit is highly preference. Then there are folks with medical issues that need to go low carb.

    Need is a strong word. Prefer is a better word. Most medical issues where low carb is used can be managed with a balanced diet and careful planning, but some prefer low carb because it takes the planning part out of the equation.
  • Hornsby
    Hornsby Posts: 10,322 Member
    Hornsby wrote: »
    Cause it works for some and they prefer it. Nothing wrong with that. Yes, it comes down to calories in and calories out but now you get to a deficit is highly preference. Then there are folks with medical issues that need to go low carb.

    Need is a strong word. Prefer is a better word. Most medical issues where low carb is used can be managed with a balanced diet and careful planning, but some prefer low carb because it takes the planning part out of the equation.

    Fair enough. I don't know enough about it to disagree. I withdraw the word "need" :)
  • Panda_Poptarts
    Panda_Poptarts Posts: 971 Member
    Some of us get some pretty significant health benefits from cutting out grains / carbs. For those of us who are overweight and insulin resistant, for example, removing the carbs can really improve things. I went from a pre-diabetic A1C to a normal A1C in under 3 months!

    That's not to say it's for everyone. Or that all of us will be low carb forever. But, low carb is moreso a way to get healthier than to lose weight faster. Most of the fast weight is water weight. The rest is slow and steady, just like everyone else.
  • JoRocka
    JoRocka Posts: 17,525 Member
    The reason **I** Do it- is because typical carbs are calorie heavy- "expensive"- so when I'm cutting the plan is to optimize volume- and minimize calorie.

    Bulking- optmize calories- minimize volume.
    Carbs are high in calories and not particularly voluminous without eating a ton of it. I.E. I can eat almost a whole box of pasta and still feel hungry- but I've eaten my whole days worth of calories- and into the next days.

    Vs a salad for example- low calorie- high volume- feel fuller (with the appropriate additions) without the pesky high calorie content.

    it's about finding a balance- I find 30% carbs works reasonably well for me. I can definitely eat more- but- 30 or less is good for me when I'm losing weigh.
  • drwilseyjr
    drwilseyjr Posts: 225 Member
    Diet is a personal preference and it all depends on what works for YOU.

    I eat a low carb diet and I've experienced positives from it. Weight loss is not what I did it for as I lost the weight I wanted to eating a normal, health conscious diet.

    Since moving to a low carb diet (under 60g on average a day), I've had better sleep, constant energy through the day, less aches and pains in the morning, no headaches, and no hunger pains. I just eat whenever.

    No, it doesn't work for everyone. And it's not an easy diet. And not everyone will experience the positives.

    This is my experience, anyway.
  • Christine_72
    Christine_72 Posts: 16,049 Member
    I chose to lower my carbs because it eliminated my cravings and I stopped counting down the minutes to every meal. I'm not perfect, and I still have a high carb day every now and then which doesn't affect me one way or the other, but I get back on the horse the next day.

    Some people find staying in a calorie deficit while eating plenty of carbs easy, others do not. It's a very individual thing.

    For me, choosing the right calories/macros helps me eat less calories. And lowering my carbs has made dieting easier and less stressful.
  • CassidyScaglione
    CassidyScaglione Posts: 673 Member
    Probably mostly because they get excited about the initial water weight drop.

    I've eaten so much bread today... Lol.
  • ForecasterJason
    ForecasterJason Posts: 2,577 Member
    Probably because carbs are what people overdo the most, so cutting back on them has a considerable impact for a lot of people.
    This. Since carbs usually contribute most of the macronutrient content of one's diet (on a general basis), it would make sense for people who are trying to lose weight to reduce consumption of them.





  • cronus70
    cronus70 Posts: 191 Member
    I'm currently trying low carb, having said that my macros were 50c, 30p and 20f but I was finding it hard to control the odd sugar craving in the evening and Easter killed me diet wise so I've knocked my carbs back a bit and upped my protein and fats a touch. Currently my macros are 35c, 40p and 25f and at least for now I'm feeling fuller for longer with more manageable craving. I've no interest in going below 35% carbs.
  • whatatime2befit
    whatatime2befit Posts: 625 Member
    Your body needs carbs for energy.
  • stevencloser
    stevencloser Posts: 8,911 Member
    Your body needs carbs for energy.

    You don't necessarily have to eat them though.
  • drwilseyjr
    drwilseyjr Posts: 225 Member
    Your body needs carbs for energy.

    @whatatime2befit No, it doesn't. The body can burn fat for energy while in ketosis.

    I eat less than 60g of carbs a day. I work ten hour shifts then lift for an hour to two hours a day after that.

    No, it doesn't work for everyone, but your body can creat energy without carbs.
This discussion has been closed.