Calories burned?
sexymom04
Posts: 263 Member
I just did my workout and my hrm says I burned 217 calories but mfp says 110. Why does it bring it down? I don't get it.
0
Replies
-
Both 217 and 110 are estimates. Your calorie burn is based on; height, weight, age, gender, exertion level & more.
A HRM is a decent estimate for steady state cardio. If that was your workout type, and you gave your HRM several factors above then 217 is more likely. A chest strap style HRM is generally more accurate than the wrist only models.
Most people eat back a % of exercise calories & then adjust up or down based upon actual weight loss results.0 -
What was your workout?0
-
Both 217 and 110 are estimates. Your calorie burn is based on; height, weight, age, gender, exertion level & more.
A HRM is a decent estimate for steady state cardio. If that was your workout type, and you gave your HRM several factors above then 217 is more likely. A chest strap style HRM is generally more accurate than the wrist only models.
Most people eat back a % of exercise calories & then adjust up or down based upon actual weight loss results.
It is a chest strap
0 -
0
-
TavistockToad wrote: »What was your workout?
Strength training
HRM are for steady state cardio, not strength training0 -
TavistockToad wrote: »What was your workout?
Strength training
Then a HRM isn't terribly helpful. I'd take (at most) the lower estimate because strength training doesn't burn a lot of calories. There are just too many factors for strength training that makes calorie burn a "wild guess."0 -
even if I do cardio, whatever the hrm gives me, mfp changes it to a lower amount
0 -
even if I do cardio, whatever the hrm gives me, mfp changes it to a lower amount
Because the HRM is designed for steady state.....that's what is does best. If your cardio is intervals then again, a HRM is not that great. But MFP's calorie burns are notoriously inaccurate.
Over ride the calorie burns to your numbers, then live with them awhile. You will get a good indicator on accuracy based upon your actual weight loss results.
There are so many estimates. Your activity level (for example) that's actually a range of numbers, not just one. So MFP picked one, high, middle or low....who knows. Logging food; some people are great at this others not so much.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions