It "Doesn't Work"
keithcw_the_first
Posts: 382 Member
At least, according to these kind of suspicious infographics:
http://vitals.lifehacker.com/these-infographics-show-the-problems-with-calorie-count-1771540530
I suspect they're selling something, because a lot of people here would disagree.
http://vitals.lifehacker.com/these-infographics-show-the-problems-with-calorie-count-1771540530
I suspect they're selling something, because a lot of people here would disagree.
0
Replies
-
#2 reminds me of the people who ask how to calculate calories for food they vomit up after being sick.1
-
They're selling nutrition coaching. So they can do it for you and you can pay lots of money for their tools and food. No thanks.14
-
Well, I don't think it's completely wrong. Most of what they're saying has some truth but I can tell you from first hand experience that counting calories works.7
-
they left out a key component, weighing food.19
-
Yes, they are selling their program. Www.precisionnutrition.com
I'll continue to count my calories as best as I can.2 -
Oh brother. It looks like a "diet coaching" web site. I tried to find out how much it costs to sign up but you have to email them and they email you back. LOL no thanks.0
-
I started pointing out all the BS, but why bother. Unfortunately a lot of people will buy whatever they're selling.
1 -
This content has been removed.
-
"People aren't great at eyeball portions"? I do not need to eyeball, I weigh it and log it and then eat it. If I still eyeballed, I would still be fat.
And am I really that worried about absorption... holy crap..
This company teaches people to use hand, fist, thumb and palm to measure food. It is still good to use this for when you are out in a restaurant or family and friends.
7 -
Because using your hand as a measure is soooooo much more exact that using a cup measure.
FFS.
Here comes "Weigh everything." (I was trying not to say it but couldn't hold it in. )
2 -
We know calories in are best estimates with possible error. So are calories out. If you stick with this long enough and make adjustments, you'll find a balance that works for you. And if you buy their coaching, you'll go through the same process, but with a lighter wallet.4
-
How come I've lost weight while counting calories? According to this info graphic, i should have gained weight.2
-
Calorie doesn't work, so let me sell you some other method to measure your portions....which is pretty much the same thing.4
-
They can file some of this under "No *kitten*, Sherlock". Other than that, there is a margin of error no matter what you do. I'm surprised, as others have stated, there was no mention of a food scale. No method of weight loss is going to be perfect and there are too many variables to the human body. That being said, calorie counting is probably the most precise method one could use for weight loss. The sad part is people who claim calorie counting "didn't work" for them would see something like this and run with it.2
-
I've lost over 28 pounds counting calories... I guess that makes me a "special snowflake"...13
-
Well they are kind of right. It may be misleading, but sizes of things do differ. ie: sweet potatoes
But, if you are weighing your food, game over, because that is efficient and precise. It does come down to calories in, calories out. This method is trying to sell you something that you can do yourself.
When it comes to each of us individually, you have to use guidelines as a basis, and find what actually works for you. We are all, at least slightly, different. What works for someone else, may, or may not work for you.3 -
Oh well.0
-
DoreenaV1975 wrote: »I've lost over 28 pounds counting calories... I guess that makes me a "special snowflake"...
And guess what?, we all did here for FREE!!!! LOL9 -
we accept it is not an exact science, because we know that in averaging things out it works. Some are higher, some are lower, it is the aggregate result we care about.2
-
Although, in a roundabout way that's a good example of why we should be weighing in grams.3
-
A lot of what the advertisement shows is true when it comes to guessing. The best bet is a food scale and I saw that I was also making the same mistakes. However, some people have a visual knack for already being able to see the portion size vs the actual weight. And once you get used to weighing it is a bit easier to guess when it comes to your own common foods.0
-
Not only do they sell their services, but they also sell "certification" so you can pay them to sell those services too. The infographic reminds me of infomercials that desperately try to create a need where none exists.0
-
The ad is exactly right in the fact that counting calories by eyeballing and using sizes like medium, small, etc can lead to wrong calorie count. It isn't actually saying CICO is wrong, it is saying people aren't accurate in what they log... something said about 100 times a day on these boards.1
-
DrifterBear wrote: »I started pointing out all the BS, but why bother. Unfortunately a lot of people will buy whatever they're selling.
There's really only one phrase you have to point out to refute most of that whole thing.
Law of large numbers.0 -
Boiling an egg adds calories? Color me skeptical.5
-
You don't need to be able to count perfectly for it to work. You just need to be consistent and learn to adjust.8
-
lemurcat12 wrote: »You don't need to be able to count perfectly for it to work. You just need to be consistent and learn to adjust.
This!
The infographic could just be a large advertisement for using a food scale. But concepts like some people digest more or less food than others is similar to that your metabolism isn't always what it's predicted to be at. Or a sedentary person who walks 1000 steps a day might have a different TDEE than someone who walks 3000 steps a day. At the end of the day, be as accurate you can be, and your numbers should tell you what your real TDEE is. If you are losing weight, it's probably working. If you aren't, try reducing how much you eat etc. You are an experiment of one, keep good records, stick with something for 4-6 weeks before making changes, and keep trying. It actually keeps weight loss more interesting to me. Rather than just "eat broccoli for the next year". Fiddling with my numbers gives me something to improve on.1 -
Mouse_Potato wrote: »Boiling an egg adds calories? Color me skeptical.
Right? Since when do cooking utensils add calories? These fattening pots, pans, knives, and blenders gotta go.7 -
I just say "it works for me" And that's all I got to say about that....(run forest run....)2
-
chnphillips wrote: »Mouse_Potato wrote: »Boiling an egg adds calories? Color me skeptical.
Right? Since when do cooking utensils add calories? These fattening pots, pans, knives, and blenders gotta go.
Fun fact: I notice that when I heat up my corn tortillas, they shrink...
I've weighed before and after, and they weigh less after...
But I still log the before weight.
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions