Net Calories...a little confused. HELP
mmjclark04
Posts: 54 Member
After eating only 800-900 calories at first...I'm learning more and more about why your body needs more. I'm trying to hit 1000-1200 but I'm a bit confused. My MFP goal is 1430. I exercise daily and wear a fitness tracker with heart rate (I know they aren't exact but I do see that it helps me). So today I have eaten 650 calories so far. However...my fitness tracker is linked to MFP and shows an adjustment of 867 calories, leaving my net NEGATIVE 218 calories. Now I still have dinner to go but I can't see eating enough to get my net calories to 1200. I've set out on this journey saying I won't eat back my exercise calories...but now I'm confused. Am I supposed to take in 1200 calories regardless of what my output is and ignore my net calories? Or are my net calories supposed to be 1200? And how on earth do you even eat that much and still lose weight if you are active. If I eat my normal calories for dinner...I will probably only have about 300 net calories for the day...
Thanks for helping me sort this info out!
Thanks for helping me sort this info out!
1
Replies
-
Your NET should be 1200. If you are getting large adjustments like that from your tracker, it means that your activity level is set too low.
My total intake for weight loss is generally in the 1800-2000 calorie range (NET has varied a bunch based on my stats as I lost weight...I think it's currently 1350). The reason I can lose on that much is my maintenance calories are 2200-2300 currently and it was higher when I was heavier.0 -
When they sync, mfp calculates how many calories you're likely to burn between now and midnight based on what you've burned so far. That's why you have a negative. You can turn off negative adjustments so that it will only add once you've reached a positive number, no adjustment til then.
You should be eating 1430 (what MFP gives you) at the end of the day. If you have exercise calories added, you can eat back a portion, all, or none. Completely up to you.0 -
You should eat back a portion of your exercise calories, as MFP tends to over-estimate them.
If you were really only eating 900 cals per day, unless you are 4 ft tall, you would be HUNGRY and the weight would be falling off you.
Are you using a food scale? If not, you are most likely eating more than you think. Most people under-estimate their portions when they eyeball or use measuring cups.
Be careful of the entries you are using in the database, many are added by users and are not correct. Especially don't use database entries that are a complete recipe (like beef stew or something like that) if you didn't create the entry yourself.
Are you logging everything, including beverages, condiments, cooking oils?
If you don't use a food scale, get one and give it a shot. I was sure I was eating 1500 per day, then I got a food scale and found I was actually eating 1800.
That was the long answer
The short answer is that 1200 calories is the bare minimum a woman should be eating unless you are very short or bedridden. It is really difficult to get proper nutrition if you are really eating that little. 0 -
When they sync, mfp calculates how many calories you're likely to burn between now and midnight based on what you've burned so far. That's why you have a negative. You can turn off negative adjustments so that it will only add once you've reached a positive number, no adjustment til then.
You should be eating 1430 (what MFP gives you) at the end of the day. If you have exercise calories added, you can eat back a portion, all, or none. Completely up to you.
@capaul42 - No. She is saying she has a positive adjustment and that her food intake minus exercise is a negative number.0 -
Lol, I read that completely backwards. Sorry.0
-
I hope your diary is very inaccurate. You're barely eating and depriving your body of the nutrients it requires to function. You don't need to be so extreme and hard on your body to lose weight.2
-
If you want some ideas on how to eat more calories then you can check out my diary, I've been at maintenance + exercise calories while marathon training.1
-
If you set MFP to lose weight, you should be eating to the goal, which is a number to reach, not be under. Additionally, you should eat at least a portion of your adjustment/exercise calories.
How do people "eat that much and still lose weight if [they] are active"? The more active a person is, be that through daily activities or exercise, the more they should eat to maintain a healthy deficit and get the nutrition they need to be healthy. Losing weight in a healthy and sustainable manner is not about eating as little as you can. However, I would agree with others that you are likely not accurately logging if you're not feeling hungry and/or fatigued on so little.
ETA - If MFP gave you a goal of 1430, why are you trying to hit 1000-1200?0 -
the numbers the OP posted dont make sense to me. what am I missing?
MFP goal - 1430
Food eaten - 650
Exercise adjustment - 867
Net - -218
1430-650-867= -87
Your net calories should be as close to zero as possible. You should be eating atleast 1430 calories a day + a percentage of your exercise calories burn. You shouldn't be eating as low as 900 calories.
But to get an adjustment of -867 calories from your exercise tracker I have to assume you have either set your activity level way too high (but since your goal is 1430 i doubt that) or there is something wrong with your tracker, is it posting 2 adjustments?. The highest negative adjustment for exercise I have seen is like -150 calories and thats when I sit around all day.0 -
I've got a similar issue.Oh nooooo... This makes me sad. Please use MFP and check out Scooby too. Put in your height, weight, activity level.. etc.. You shouldn't deprive yourself like that or you WILL burn out. and be unsuccessful.
My goal is 1980 (I've got a lot of weight to lose)
My net today is 948, and that's after having a bit of a cheat day (dinner at a diner with Gyros, eggs, home fries and toast, no sparing of butter or tzaziki
Two days ago, I ate 1379 and was satisfied all day (I drank lots of water throughout the day which really helped) and my net calories consumed was WAY into the negatives, -1712 or something like that.
I'm really not feeling deprived, not either day.
0 -
charleycartee wrote: »
I've got a similar issue.Oh nooooo... This makes me sad. Please use MFP and check out Scooby too. Put in your height, weight, activity level.. etc.. You shouldn't deprive yourself like that or you WILL burn out. and be unsuccessful.
My goal is 1980 (I've got a lot of weight to lose)
My net today is 948, and that's after having a bit of a cheat day (dinner at a diner with Gyros, eggs, home fries and toast, no sparing of butter or tzaziki
Two days ago, I ate 1379 and was satisfied all day (I drank lots of water throughout the day which really helped) and my net calories consumed was WAY into the negatives, -1712 or something like that.
I'm really not feeling deprived, not either day.
You were negative 1712 in ONE single day?? Holy moly, if you're confident your logging is accurate, then you so very badly need to eat more.
0 -
Christine_72 wrote: »charleycartee wrote: »
I've got a similar issue.Oh nooooo... This makes me sad. Please use MFP and check out Scooby too. Put in your height, weight, activity level.. etc.. You shouldn't deprive yourself like that or you WILL burn out. and be unsuccessful.
My goal is 1980 (I've got a lot of weight to lose)
My net today is 948, and that's after having a bit of a cheat day (dinner at a diner with Gyros, eggs, home fries and toast, no sparing of butter or tzaziki
Two days ago, I ate 1379 and was satisfied all day (I drank lots of water throughout the day which really helped) and my net calories consumed was WAY into the negatives, -1712 or something like that.
I'm really not feeling deprived, not either day.
You were negative 1712 in ONE single day?? Holy moly, if you're confident your logging is accurate, then you so very badly need to eat more.
I was just going to post the same thing. Are you using a food scale? Are you verifying your database entries are correct? Where are you getting your exercise calories burn from? If your numbers are accurate, you are damaging your health. If you don't feel hungry and lethargic, I'd assume your numbers aren't accurate. There is no way as an adult male you can get adequate micro and macro nutrients with so little fuel.0 -
I agree with the others on eating too low. You may feel great now but it will eventually hit you like a freight train, even me at 5ft nothing, been there and done that years ago. If net calories is confusing just stop using it and look at the amount of caloires per day, eat just enough under mainteance to make a deficit. All you need is a little deficit most days out of every week to succeed, and eat up to your maintenace at least 1 day a week to keep your hormones stable.
Sometimes we just have to time our meals a little better so you are not trying to scrunch it all in during the evening. Every day does not have to be the same. We tend to get in ruts with the deficits. If you want to make this a lifestyle where you don't rebound it's important to learn to eat normal and not such a deep deficit.
Keep it low and there will be a crash ahead. No amount of willpower will combat those hunger hormones the body will produce, you are not immune to it, no human is. It is not fun, it is not pretty.
This game requires much patience and caring for your body while keeping your eye on the goal, it's about the hardest thing any of us will ever do.0 -
Some stuff was measured volumetrically, but most of it was by weight.Christine_72 wrote: »charleycartee wrote: »
I've got a similar issue.Oh nooooo... This makes me sad. Please use MFP and check out Scooby too. Put in your height, weight, activity level.. etc.. You shouldn't deprive yourself like that or you WILL burn out. and be unsuccessful.
My goal is 1980 (I've got a lot of weight to lose)
My net today is 948, and that's after having a bit of a cheat day (dinner at a diner with Gyros, eggs, home fries and toast, no sparing of butter or tzaziki
Two days ago, I ate 1379 and was satisfied all day (I drank lots of water throughout the day which really helped) and my net calories consumed was WAY into the negatives, -1712 or something like that.
I'm really not feeling deprived, not either day.
You were negative 1712 in ONE single day?? Holy moly, if you're confident your logging is accurate, then you so very badly need to eat more.
I tend to not eat unless I'm hungry, and I don't trust having 2490 calories from exercise (even if I was just over 24,000 steps on the fitbit)
0 -
@Merkavar -the numbers the OP posted dont make sense to me. what am I missing?
MFP goal - 1430
Food eaten - 650
Exercise adjustment - 867
Net - -218
1430-650-867= -87
Your net calories should be as close to zero as possible. You should be eating atleast 1430 calories a day + a percentage of your exercise calories burn. You shouldn't be eating as low as 900 calories.
But to get an adjustment of -867 calories from your exercise tracker I have to assume you have either set your activity level way too high (but since your goal is 1430 i doubt that) or there is something wrong with your tracker, is it posting 2 adjustments?. The highest negative adjustment for exercise I have seen is like -150 calories and thats when I sit around all day.
Your math is off. And her adjustment is positive, not negative. Just the NET is negative.
650 (calories consumed) - 867 (calorie adjustment for exercise) = net -217
or
1430 (goal) - 650 (consumed) + 867 (burned) = 1647 remaining
1430 (goal) - 1647 remaining calories = -2172 -
Yeah I assumed that exercise was negative since that was the only way I could get close to -217 net.shadow2soul wrote: »
@Merkavar -the numbers the OP posted dont make sense to me. what am I missing?
MFP goal - 1430
Food eaten - 650
Exercise adjustment - 867
Net - -218
1430-650-867= -87
Your net calories should be as close to zero as possible. You should be eating atleast 1430 calories a day + a percentage of your exercise calories burn. You shouldn't be eating as low as 900 calories.
But to get an adjustment of -867 calories from your exercise tracker I have to assume you have either set your activity level way too high (but since your goal is 1430 i doubt that) or there is something wrong with your tracker, is it posting 2 adjustments?. The highest negative adjustment for exercise I have seen is like -150 calories and thats when I sit around all day.
Your math is off. And her adjustment is positive, not negative. Just the NET is negative.
650 (calories consumed) - 867 (calorie adjustment for exercise) = net -217
or
1430 (goal) - 650 (consumed) + 867 (burned) = 1647 remaining
1430 (goal) - 1647 remaining calories = -217
What does 217 have to do with anything then? That's doubling up on the goal isn't it?
Why are you and the op taking the net calories(1647) away from the goal? The net calories already included the goal.
She should be aiming to eat 1647 more assuming she is eating 100% of the exercise calories.
Am I wrong here? Is this a phone vs website thing where the net is different on each?0 -
Yeah I assumed that exercise was negative since that was the only way I could get close to -217 net.shadow2soul wrote: »
@Merkavar -the numbers the OP posted dont make sense to me. what am I missing?
MFP goal - 1430
Food eaten - 650
Exercise adjustment - 867
Net - -218
1430-650-867= -87
Your net calories should be as close to zero as possible. You should be eating atleast 1430 calories a day + a percentage of your exercise calories burn. You shouldn't be eating as low as 900 calories.
But to get an adjustment of -867 calories from your exercise tracker I have to assume you have either set your activity level way too high (but since your goal is 1430 i doubt that) or there is something wrong with your tracker, is it posting 2 adjustments?. The highest negative adjustment for exercise I have seen is like -150 calories and thats when I sit around all day.
Your math is off. And her adjustment is positive, not negative. Just the NET is negative.
650 (calories consumed) - 867 (calorie adjustment for exercise) = net -217
or
1430 (goal) - 650 (consumed) + 867 (burned) = 1647 remaining
1430 (goal) - 1647 remaining calories = -217
What does 217 have to do with anything then? That's doubling up on the goal isn't it?
Why are you and the op taking the net calories(1647) away from the goal? The net calories already included the goal.
She should be aiming to eat 1647 more assuming she is eating 100% of the exercise calories.
Am I wrong here? Is this a phone vs website thing where the net is different on each?
-217 seems to be the calories she has consumed today so far.
0 -
Yeah I assumed that exercise was negative since that was the only way I could get close to -217 net.shadow2soul wrote: »
@Merkavar -the numbers the OP posted dont make sense to me. what am I missing?
MFP goal - 1430
Food eaten - 650
Exercise adjustment - 867
Net - -218
1430-650-867= -87
Your net calories should be as close to zero as possible. You should be eating atleast 1430 calories a day + a percentage of your exercise calories burn. You shouldn't be eating as low as 900 calories.
But to get an adjustment of -867 calories from your exercise tracker I have to assume you have either set your activity level way too high (but since your goal is 1430 i doubt that) or there is something wrong with your tracker, is it posting 2 adjustments?. The highest negative adjustment for exercise I have seen is like -150 calories and thats when I sit around all day.
Your math is off. And her adjustment is positive, not negative. Just the NET is negative.
650 (calories consumed) - 867 (calorie adjustment for exercise) = net -217
or
1430 (goal) - 650 (consumed) + 867 (burned) = 1647 remaining
1430 (goal) - 1647 remaining calories = -217
What does 217 have to do with anything then? That's doubling up on the goal isn't it?
Why are you and the op taking the net calories away from the goal? The net calories already included the goal.
She should be aiming to eat 1647 more assuming she is eating 100% of the exercise calories.
Am I wrong here?
NET refers to food intake minus exercise burned. That's how MFP calculates NET calories consumed.
Look at your MFP home page:
I'll use my numbers for example-
from website
remaining -30
Goal 1350 | 2215 consumed - 835 exercise burned = NET 1380
from app
1350 goal - 2215 consumed + 835 = -30 remaining
On the OP's homepage she is seeing:
Remaining 1647
Goal 1430 | 650 consumed - 867 burned = NET -217
0 -
For some stuff. I do a lot of volumetric for my breakfast smoothie because it's fast, and "close enough" . Dinner was a recipe where I weighed most of the stuff, and then weighed it at the end to figure out the number of servings (4.5 lbs of end result = nine 8 oz servings).I was just going to post the same thing. Are you using a food scale?
I had to correct the protein powder I'm using. It was listed as 85% of my calcium per day instead of 9% (85g), for example. I spot check some things, and do occasionally (but not always) weigh even prepackaged stuff rather than just entering the amount the package says.Are you verifying your database entries are correct?
Hiking, generally in the 21-24 minutes per mile speed. Fitbit says 24058 steps, 11.08 miles for that day. 3 miles in the morning, 2miles on my lunch break, and another 2miles in the evening while waiting for my kids to get out of rehearsal, plus a short 1 stroll with my wife after the kids went to bed, plus a bunch of short walks throughout the day to get my 250 steps per hour and whatever incidental steps I took doing things like going to the kitchen to get a cup of water or down to the mailbox.Where are you getting your exercise calories burn from?
That's why I'm kind of skeptical over the calories from exercise it's awarding me. If anything, I feel energetic.If you don't feel hungry and lethargic, I'd assume your numbers aren't accurate.
Today was a almost a cheat day; gyros and eggs and home fries at a diner for dinner. I had to guess at portions.0 -
gebeziseva wrote: »
Yeah I assumed that exercise was negative since that was the only way I could get close to -217 net.shadow2soul wrote: »
@Merkavar -the numbers the OP posted dont make sense to me. what am I missing?
MFP goal - 1430
Food eaten - 650
Exercise adjustment - 867
Net - -218
1430-650-867= -87
Your net calories should be as close to zero as possible. You should be eating atleast 1430 calories a day + a percentage of your exercise calories burn. You shouldn't be eating as low as 900 calories.
But to get an adjustment of -867 calories from your exercise tracker I have to assume you have either set your activity level way too high (but since your goal is 1430 i doubt that) or there is something wrong with your tracker, is it posting 2 adjustments?. The highest negative adjustment for exercise I have seen is like -150 calories and thats when I sit around all day.
Your math is off. And her adjustment is positive, not negative. Just the NET is negative.
650 (calories consumed) - 867 (calorie adjustment for exercise) = net -217
or
1430 (goal) - 650 (consumed) + 867 (burned) = 1647 remaining
1430 (goal) - 1647 remaining calories = -217
What does 217 have to do with anything then? That's doubling up on the goal isn't it?
Why are you and the op taking the net calories(1647) away from the goal? The net calories already included the goal.
She should be aiming to eat 1647 more assuming she is eating 100% of the exercise calories.
Am I wrong here? Is this a phone vs website thing where the net is different on each?
-217 seems to be the calories she has consumed today so far.
Yeah, which as far as I'm aware isn't the net, maybe that's where the confusion is, I'm talking the total net, being goal-food+exercise=net of 1647 in this case.
While some are talking net as in just food and exercise and not including the original goal. Something I wouldn't call net and mfp doesn't call net either.0 -
gebeziseva wrote: »
Yeah I assumed that exercise was negative since that was the only way I could get close to -217 net.shadow2soul wrote: »
@Merkavar -the numbers the OP posted dont make sense to me. what am I missing?
MFP goal - 1430
Food eaten - 650
Exercise adjustment - 867
Net - -218
1430-650-867= -87
Your net calories should be as close to zero as possible. You should be eating atleast 1430 calories a day + a percentage of your exercise calories burn. You shouldn't be eating as low as 900 calories.
But to get an adjustment of -867 calories from your exercise tracker I have to assume you have either set your activity level way too high (but since your goal is 1430 i doubt that) or there is something wrong with your tracker, is it posting 2 adjustments?. The highest negative adjustment for exercise I have seen is like -150 calories and thats when I sit around all day.
Your math is off. And her adjustment is positive, not negative. Just the NET is negative.
650 (calories consumed) - 867 (calorie adjustment for exercise) = net -217
or
1430 (goal) - 650 (consumed) + 867 (burned) = 1647 remaining
1430 (goal) - 1647 remaining calories = -217
What does 217 have to do with anything then? That's doubling up on the goal isn't it?
Why are you and the op taking the net calories(1647) away from the goal? The net calories already included the goal.
She should be aiming to eat 1647 more assuming she is eating 100% of the exercise calories.
Am I wrong here? Is this a phone vs website thing where the net is different on each?
-217 seems to be the calories she has consumed today so far.
Yeah, which as far as I'm aware isn't the net, maybe that's where the confusion is, I'm talking the total net, being goal-food+exercise=net of 1647 in this case.
While some are talking net as in just food and exercise and not including the original goal. Something I wouldn't call net and mfp doesn't call net either.
Actually that's where you are wrong.
On the website the math is food consumed - exercise = NET consumption
The app on the other hand doesn't do the math for NET, but just shows the math for calories remaining.We set your nutritional target in Net Calories which we define as:
Calories Consumed (Food) - Calories Burned (Exercise) = Net Calories
https://myfitnesspal.desk.com/customer/en/portal/articles/12031-what-are-net-calories-0 -
gebeziseva wrote: »
Yeah I assumed that exercise was negative since that was the only way I could get close to -217 net.shadow2soul wrote: »
@Merkavar -the numbers the OP posted dont make sense to me. what am I missing?
MFP goal - 1430
Food eaten - 650
Exercise adjustment - 867
Net - -218
1430-650-867= -87
Your net calories should be as close to zero as possible. You should be eating atleast 1430 calories a day + a percentage of your exercise calories burn. You shouldn't be eating as low as 900 calories.
But to get an adjustment of -867 calories from your exercise tracker I have to assume you have either set your activity level way too high (but since your goal is 1430 i doubt that) or there is something wrong with your tracker, is it posting 2 adjustments?. The highest negative adjustment for exercise I have seen is like -150 calories and thats when I sit around all day.
Your math is off. And her adjustment is positive, not negative. Just the NET is negative.
650 (calories consumed) - 867 (calorie adjustment for exercise) = net -217
or
1430 (goal) - 650 (consumed) + 867 (burned) = 1647 remaining
1430 (goal) - 1647 remaining calories = -217
What does 217 have to do with anything then? That's doubling up on the goal isn't it?
Why are you and the op taking the net calories(1647) away from the goal? The net calories already included the goal.
She should be aiming to eat 1647 more assuming she is eating 100% of the exercise calories.
Am I wrong here? Is this a phone vs website thing where the net is different on each?
-217 seems to be the calories she has consumed today so far.
Yeah, which as far as I'm aware isn't the net, maybe that's where the confusion is, I'm talking the total net, being goal-food+exercise=net of 1647 in this case.
While some are talking net as in just food and exercise and not including the original goal. Something I wouldn't call net and mfp doesn't call net either.
THere are 2 different screens.
1. My home. This shows Goal, then food minus exercise = net
2. Food > Diary. This shows Totals (food), Your daily goal and then Remaining
On the first screen it's just food minus exercise = net. Goal isn't included in that calculation.0 -
shadow2soul wrote: »gebeziseva wrote: »
Yeah I assumed that exercise was negative since that was the only way I could get close to -217 net.shadow2soul wrote: »
@Merkavar -the numbers the OP posted dont make sense to me. what am I missing?
MFP goal - 1430
Food eaten - 650
Exercise adjustment - 867
Net - -218
1430-650-867= -87
Your net calories should be as close to zero as possible. You should be eating atleast 1430 calories a day + a percentage of your exercise calories burn. You shouldn't be eating as low as 900 calories.
But to get an adjustment of -867 calories from your exercise tracker I have to assume you have either set your activity level way too high (but since your goal is 1430 i doubt that) or there is something wrong with your tracker, is it posting 2 adjustments?. The highest negative adjustment for exercise I have seen is like -150 calories and thats when I sit around all day.
Your math is off. And her adjustment is positive, not negative. Just the NET is negative.
650 (calories consumed) - 867 (calorie adjustment for exercise) = net -217
or
1430 (goal) - 650 (consumed) + 867 (burned) = 1647 remaining
1430 (goal) - 1647 remaining calories = -217
What does 217 have to do with anything then? That's doubling up on the goal isn't it?
Why are you and the op taking the net calories(1647) away from the goal? The net calories already included the goal.
She should be aiming to eat 1647 more assuming she is eating 100% of the exercise calories.
Am I wrong here? Is this a phone vs website thing where the net is different on each?
-217 seems to be the calories she has consumed today so far.
Yeah, which as far as I'm aware isn't the net, maybe that's where the confusion is, I'm talking the total net, being goal-food+exercise=net of 1647 in this case.
While some are talking net as in just food and exercise and not including the original goal. Something I wouldn't call net and mfp doesn't call net either.
Actually that's where you are wrong.
On the website the math is food consumed - exercise = NET consumption
The app on the other hand doesn't do the math for NET, but just shows the math for calories remaining.We set your nutritional target in Net Calories which we define as:
Calories Consumed (Food) - Calories Burned (Exercise) = Net Calories
https://myfitnesspal.desk.com/customer/en/portal/articles/12031-what-are-net-calories-
Guess i was wrong about what mfp calls net calories. yeah I think I just confused myself completely about net calories and calories remaining.
Just ignore my posts, im off with the faries this morning
0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions