Is Sugar our Biggest Diet Breaker?

The_Enginerd

lemurcat12 wrote: »

svel713 wrote: »

Doctors say a new study provides 'the strongest evidence to date' that sugar causes health risks, regardless of whether it increases calorie intake

However, I do think the US diet on average contains too much sugar and that if people are eating 28% of their calories from sugar, as in the example given, that of course it's probably going to be an improvement to reduce it to 10% (which is not especially low--it's what the US Dietary Guidelines currently recommend).

I am also not surprised that kids were overeating more on the 28% sugar diet and having a hard time recognizing satiety given that a lot of the sugar was likely from soda and highly palatable foods that people tend to overeat. This is the reason for the US Dietary Guidelines limit (and WHO's reasoning for their own limit) -- lots of added sugar tends to result in excess calories in the diet as a whole.

I believe that the guideline is 10% of calories from added sugar.

I got fat from eating too much Mexican food. Candy and sweets are not an issue for me. I just started into my last bag of leftover Halloween candy that I bought on sale the day after. Just on sale Christmas and Easter candy left, I might get through them by next Christmas at the rate I'm going, which is one serving (~200 calories) of treats/day.

lemurcat12

The_Enginerd wrote: »

lemurcat12 wrote: »

svel713 wrote: »

Doctors say a new study provides 'the strongest evidence to date' that sugar causes health risks, regardless of whether it increases calorie intake

However, I do think the US diet on average contains too much sugar and that if people are eating 28% of their calories from sugar, as in the example given, that of course it's probably going to be an improvement to reduce it to 10% (which is not especially low--it's what the US Dietary Guidelines currently recommend).

I am also not surprised that kids were overeating more on the 28% sugar diet and having a hard time recognizing satiety given that a lot of the sugar was likely from soda and highly palatable foods that people tend to overeat. This is the reason for the US Dietary Guidelines limit (and WHO's reasoning for their own limit) -- lots of added sugar tends to result in excess calories in the diet as a whole.

I believe that the guideline is 10% of calories from added sugar.

Yes, that's true. It looks like they were replacing foods with added sugar here, though. http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/10/27/cutting-sugar-improves-childrens-health-in-just-10-days/?_r=0

I suspect that replacing the foods with fruit would not have prevented the results, personally, and I didn't catch that it was 10% all sugar here, which would be low potentially depending on how much dairy, fruit, and vegetables are included.

I got fat from eating too much Mexican food. Candy and sweets are not an issue for me. I just started into my last bag of leftover Halloween candy that I bought on sale the day after. Just on sale Christmas and Easter candy left, I might get through them by next Christmas at the rate I'm going, which is one serving (~200 calories) of treats/day.

I'm not suggesting that sweets are an issue for everyone. They weren't a big issue for me either. The fact remains that these children seem to have been eating quite a lot of added sugar, and that it's not terribly surprising that they found their diets more satiating when they cut back and had some other positive effects (although hard to isolate the cause).

Gamliela

I think what I do is switch processed sugar for the sugar in fruit and dairy because I like to indulge in yogurt and fruit for my treats. I don't have a sweet tooth, I have a 'fat tooth', so yogurt and fruit with a dolop of nut butter would exite me more than a bottle of coke or candies.

Its good on that the science people keep on taking the time and money for all these studies on sugar and keep telling us stuff I guess but nothing seems conclusive so everybody still gets to choose what kind of sugars they want to eat or drink. So far anyway with the exception that in Great Britain you pay a tax if you eat processed sugar.

The_Enginerd

lemurcat12 wrote: »

I'm not suggesting that sweets are an issue for everyone. They weren't a big issue for me either. The fact remains that these children seem to have been eating quite a lot of added sugar, and that it's not terribly surprising that they found their diets more satiating when they cut back and had some other positive effects (although hard to isolate the cause).

That comment on sugar not being an issue for me was intended to be a response in general to some of the comments in this thread, not to your above comment. But that is quite true, I could EASILY eat thousands of calories in treats like cookies/chocolate in one sitting because they aren't very satiating and are very tasty.

cwolfman13

Packerjohn wrote: »

cwolfman13 wrote: »

I personally don't think it's exactly breaking news that sugar consumed in excess is bad for you. I also don't think it's breaking news that the SAD typically contains an overabundance of sugar (among other nutrient deficiencies) and that most people who eat the SAD could stand to substantially reduce their sugar and "junk" food in general.

Does this mean that sugar is inherently "bad"?...I don't think so...sugar has been consumed forever without ill effect. The issue isn't sugar in and of itself...the issue is that a lot of people eat way too much of it. I know people in my office who eat cake for breakfast and wash that down with a Dr. Pepper and then you see them at lunch walking around with a 40 ounce soda to wash down their fries and triple decker bacon burger super sized combo. To that end, a "poor diet" is going to have a lot of other things wrong with it than just sugar.

Nice thoughts. Of course too much of anything will make someone fat. I'm going to go out on a limb though and say if you look at the diets of the obese vs normal weight, the obese will generally be getting a higher % of their calories from high calorie, nutritionally less dense foods.

Absolutely...

When I determined that I wanted to be healthier, leaner, and more fit, I looked around at the handful of my friends that were such and observed that on the whole they ate very healthfully and they ate lean...much better than I was eating...and they were active and exercised regularly. I personally drank a lot of soda and ate a pretty high fat diet and didn't do much with myself except sit on my patio smoking cigarettes and drinking beer. I'm about 180* from where I was about 4 years ago.