We are pleased to announce that on March 4, 2025, an updated Rich Text Editor will be introduced in the MyFitnessPal Community. To learn more about the upcoming changes, please click here. We look forward to sharing this new feature with you!

Exercise Bike Calorie Count Vs MFP Calorie Count?

atragicfate
atragicfate Posts: 57
edited January 29 in Fitness and Exercise
My exercise bike (which is a York Nexus) tells me that in the 30min I use the bike I burn 50 calories. I went to log it on MFP but it told me that I burnt 246 calories.
Which is accurate?

Replies

  • cbbn11
    cbbn11 Posts: 121 Member
    50 calories for 30 min bike ride definitely does not sound right.
  • 50 calories for 30 min bike ride definitely does not sound right.
    I didn't think so. I might just go with MFP's amount...
  • melindasuefritz
    melindasuefritz Posts: 3,509 Member
    50 calories for 30 min bike ride definitely does not sound right.
  • melindasuefritz
    melindasuefritz Posts: 3,509 Member
    Stationary bike, moderate effort (bicycling, cycling, biking) 30 min- 397
  • TravelDog14
    TravelDog14 Posts: 317 Member
    I always enter a lower number of calories burned than what MFP or my treadmill gives me.
    It's too easy to overestimate your exercise burn and I'd rather be lower than higher.

    Also I use this calories burned calculator because it takes your gender, age, height and weight into account.

    http://www.freedieting.com/tools/calories_burned.htm
  • I always enter a lower number of calories burned than what MFP or my treadmill gives me.
    It's too easy to overestimate your exercise burn and I'd rather be lower than higher.

    Also I use this calories burned calculator because it takes your gender, age, height and weight into account.

    http://www.freedieting.com/tools/calories_burned.htm
    Thank you! I entered in how long I used the bike for and it gave me just under the amount of calories MFP told me :)
  • acpgee
    acpgee Posts: 8,077 Member
    I don't expect either to be accurate. On my typical workout of 65 minutes on the elliptical trainer, targetting a heart rate between140 to 150 these are the readings I get:

    HRM: 500-530
    Machine: 750-780
    MFP: 926
  • I don't expect either to be accurate. On my typical workout of 65 minutes on the elliptical trainer, targetting a heart rate between140 to 150 these are the readings I get:

    HRM: 500-530
    Machine: 750-780
    MFP: 926
    Also, MFP doesn't take into account the type of machine you're using because pretty much all of them work differently.
  • SuzCruz159
    SuzCruz159 Posts: 28 Member
    I use Map My Ride app to track my bike rides outside. Today I went 4 miles, 27:20 mins at 8.8 mph, burned 356 calories.
    When I entered it in MFP under Bicycling <10 mph it calculated 216 calories burned.
    On both of these I was able to enter my age, gender, current weight, etc. but still got quite a difference. I usually go by the lesser amount of calories burned to be on the safe side.
  • avidisson
    avidisson Posts: 5 Member
    I don't expect either to be accurate. On my typical workout of 65 minutes on the elliptical trainer, targetting a heart rate between140 to 150 these are the readings I get:

    HRM: 500-530
    Machine: 750-780
    MFP: 926

    I agree and I see about the same numbers when I'm training.

    In my opinion; if you have a decent heart rate monitor (HRM) and if you've set it up correctly (configured age, sex, weight etc.) the HRM should be quite accurate...
This discussion has been closed.