Should I be doing cardio? Lifting weights? Both?
JessaWannaEatEverything
Posts: 106 Member
I currently do strength training for half an hour, and then cardio for 30-45 min. One of the guys at my gym told me I would get better results if I focus on cardio until I lose the weight - then start back up on the weight lifting. This caused a big fight at my gym, and everyone had a different opinion. What do you guys think?
0
Replies
-
This content has been removed.
-
Depends on what your goals are. If you are merely wanting to lose weight, then focus on cardio. If you're looking for a booty that'll stop traffic... those aren't made by being a cardio bunny.
If you are losing weight, some sort of weight training should be part of that to minimise loss of muscle, bone, etc...11 -
Depends on what your goals are. If you are merely wanting to lose weight, then focus on cardio. If you're looking for a booty that'll stop traffic... those aren't made by being a cardio bunny.
I like having a butt, and when I was in shape before I would do 3 days strength and 2 cardio. The guy at the gym's point was it's easier to get the weight off quickly first (cardio, and calorie deficit) then build muscle (weights, and extra calories). Not sure if that means I should stop lifting for a few months though?0 -
You should be doing at least enough strength training to keep the muscle spared - otherwise some of it gets thrown on the fire along with the fat. But cardio burns calories a lot faster than most strength training. Can combine the two to a certain extent - circuit training, kettlebell training, and so on...2
-
JessaWannaEatEverything wrote: »Depends on what your goals are. If you are merely wanting to lose weight, then focus on cardio. If you're looking for a booty that'll stop traffic... those aren't made by being a cardio bunny.
I like having a butt, and when I was in shape before I would do 3 days strength and 2 cardio. The guy at the gym's point was it's easier to get the weight off quickly first (cardio, and calorie deficit) then build muscle (weights, and extra calories). Not sure if that means I should stop lifting for a few months though?
I generally disagree with the person at your gym who was suggesting this.
4 -
JessaWannaEatEverything wrote: »Depends on what your goals are. If you are merely wanting to lose weight, then focus on cardio. If you're looking for a booty that'll stop traffic... those aren't made by being a cardio bunny.
I like having a butt, and when I was in shape before I would do 3 days strength and 2 cardio. The guy at the gym's point was it's easier to get the weight off quickly first (cardio, and calorie deficit) then build muscle (weights, and extra calories). Not sure if that means I should stop lifting for a few months though?
No, do not stop lifting. He gave you bad advice. I would ignore it.
Also, building muscle is not easy. I have no idea how old this guy was but keep in mind that no woman gains muscle at the rate that a man does.3 -
Thanks everyone! I was hoping he was wrong. I mean.. he has awesome abs, so I thought I at least needed to check out what he was saying.0
-
This content has been removed.
-
he was wrong. keep lifting2
-
JessaWannaEatEverything wrote: »Thanks everyone! I was hoping he was wrong. I mean.. he has awesome abs, so I thought I at least needed to check out what he was saying.
Respectfully, Abs and muscles are not an indicator of being right.4 -
LIFT!!!!1
-
If you're losing weight you are likely to lose muscle as well. Lifting helps retain muscle when in a calorie deficit.1
-
JessaWannaEatEverything wrote: »Thanks everyone! I was hoping he was wrong. I mean.. he has awesome abs, so I thought I at least needed to check out what he was saying.
Respectfully, Abs and muscles are not an indicator of being right.
They're an indicator of him knowing enough to get abs. Don't get me wrong, I'm glad everyone is saying to keep lifting. I didn't want to give it up, but being a newbie I wasn't sure if I was making some workout mistakes.0 -
I my self is currently weight than want to gain muscle mass once I get to my desired weight. Right now I am doing cardio and using resistance bands just to keep muscles working .0
-
I think it's probably a good idea to also point out that it's not really weight loss that matters, it's fat loss. High intensity interval training is a good way to get better cardiovascular shape and lose fat while maintaining muscle. Might want to look more into that. You'll burn more calories then jogging on a treadmill. I have my clients do more tempo, fartlek, interval training if they want to solely do cardio workouts. Usually I hit a mix of lighter weight at higher intensity and less rest, you'll be surprised how much cardio you get. Just make sure who ever is helping you has experience and knowledge of it. You'll hear a lot of stuff in the gym that has no scientific backing.2
-
JessaWannaEatEverything wrote: »JessaWannaEatEverything wrote: »Thanks everyone! I was hoping he was wrong. I mean.. he has awesome abs, so I thought I at least needed to check out what he was saying.
Respectfully, Abs and muscles are not an indicator of being right.
They're an indicator of him knowing enough to get abs. Don't get me wrong, I'm glad everyone is saying to keep lifting. I didn't want to give it up, but being a newbie I wasn't sure if I was making some workout mistakes.
Being a "him" it's far easier and quicker for him to build, or have to rebuild, muscle than it would be for you.
Doing both cardio and resistance/strength training is optimal IMHO.
My preference is to separate the two completely - do each one to the best of your ability and not compromise your exercise performance by doing the two in the same workout.1 -
I am by no means an expert but I would not give up the lifting. I lost 32 pounds previously using MFP and lifting heavy. It makes me feel strong, helps with my joint issues, strengthens my core and basically makes me feel like a beast.1
-
chrisbyradio wrote: »I think it's probably a good idea to also point out that it's not really weight loss that matters, it's fat loss. High intensity interval training is a good way to get better cardiovascular shape and lose fat while maintaining muscle. Might want to look more into that. You'll burn more calories then jogging on a treadmill. I have my clients do more tempo, fartlek, interval training if they want to solely do cardio workouts. Usually I hit a mix of lighter weight at higher intensity and less rest, you'll be surprised how much cardio you get. Just make sure who ever is helping you has experience and knowledge of it. You'll hear a lot of stuff in the gym that has no scientific backing.
Do you recommend the 80/20% for cardio? It seems to be what the best endurance athletes do. Why not model endurance training by what they do?
0 -
filovirus76 wrote: »chrisbyradio wrote: »I think it's probably a good idea to also point out that it's not really weight loss that matters, it's fat loss. High intensity interval training is a good way to get better cardiovascular shape and lose fat while maintaining muscle. Might want to look more into that. You'll burn more calories then jogging on a treadmill. I have my clients do more tempo, fartlek, interval training if they want to solely do cardio workouts. Usually I hit a mix of lighter weight at higher intensity and less rest, you'll be surprised how much cardio you get. Just make sure who ever is helping you has experience and knowledge of it. You'll hear a lot of stuff in the gym that has no scientific backing.
Do you recommend the 80/20% for cardio? It seems to be what the best endurance athletes do. Why not model endurance training by what they do?
So I don't particularly, but I am not an endurance athlete. Same with my clients. Most people only have 30 minutes a day to get out and do something and you'll more efficiently get your HR up and cover greater distance using interval methods than long, slow distance. I've trained for multiple triathlons in the past and have found that higher intensity training led to increased performance. That's only anecdotal but I did notice huge changes in lactate threshold and VO2max when I took away slow running, biking and swimming (all for the the better). If you're goal is to run marathons frequently or long distance triathlons then go for it. If you're going for fat loss and increased athletic performance and every day functional activity I wouldn't do the 80/20 method of training. The other thing to remember is that long slow distance running (not so much biking) can be catabolic to muscle and a lot of endurance athletes skip the weight room in exchange for putting in mileage. 80/20 may be good for a marathoner but detrimental to a basketball player. Just depends what your goals are.0 -
Anaerobic exercise can be cardiovascular.0
-
If I want some cardio with my weight training. I do circuit training or supersets with high volume.1
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions