Weight Watchers and MFP

Was thinking about doing Weight Watchers and MFP together? Anyone else doing and done this?
«1

Replies

  • Anabug81
    Anabug81 Posts: 161 Member
    That is what I have been learning through my research. I guess I will stick with MFP.
  • Queenmunchy
    Queenmunchy Posts: 3,380 Member
    Yep, I did. I consistently lost weight every week within the parameters of the old WW (8 years ago) and calorie counting simultaneously. It was free for me because I was an interpreter, but I wouldn't pay for it.
  • newheavensearth
    newheavensearth Posts: 870 Member
    My calories following the new WW points system are very inconsistent. They range from 1000 to close to 2100 depending on food choices. Since fruits and veggies are 0 points, those calories can up your calorie count. Too high for me to lose, or I gain some weeks, or so low I'm hungry. So far I'm maintaining my weight on it +/- 2lbs. I want to lose more, so I'm back to counting calories.
  • baciodolce18
    baciodolce18 Posts: 113 Member
    I'm sad WW changed so drastically. I was super successful on points plus 3-4 years ago losing 45 pounds. I was wanting to rejoin because of how successful I was but was really scared off by smart points.
  • typeitdaily
    typeitdaily Posts: 3,322 Member
    edited May 2016
    I left WW when they changed their program. Way too restrictive! All the "free" fruits and vegetables were hard on my calorie count also. I was always starving!
  • TxTiffani
    TxTiffani Posts: 799 Member
    I feel like there's some unnecessary steps converting foods to points when you can just put your cals in MFP. IMO.
  • alyssa0061
    alyssa0061 Posts: 652 Member
    MissusMoon wrote: »
    For those looking into WW, not only is the new plan restrictive and sort of woo, but apparently the website and app are a disaster, and they've outsourced their billing and customer service. Just spend a few minutes looking at this: https://www.consumeraffairs.com/nutrition/weight_watchers.html Good luck getting a refund or simply being able to cancel your account.

    MFP is free and gives you the tools to make a real lifestyle change. No way I'd ever go back to WW given how much they've fallen.

    The app is complete crap and gets worse and worse with every update they do.

    The only thing I like about it is the toggle feature when logging foods. It makes it extremely easy to log something by grams or ounces.

    The social media portion of the app (Connect) is filled with nothing but drivel and misinformation.
  • Wineandyoga
    Wineandyoga Posts: 2 Member
    I just switched to MFP from WW. I did WW points plus a couple of years ago and loved it. But like others have said, the new system is way too restrictive. On the days I was staying within my points, I was only eating 600-800 calories, and was starving all the time! The app was also terrible and I was unable to track at all for about a week. I've been doing MFP for about a week now and I am so much happier and feel so much better. I do not recommend adding the new WW program.
  • randomtai
    randomtai Posts: 9,003 Member
    I like free.
  • DebSozo
    DebSozo Posts: 2,578 Member
    edited May 2016
    randomtai wrote: »
    I like free.

    Me too! I like how easy MFP is. I had friends who did WW and all they talked about was points. To me they got obsessed with "counting points". MFP feels more intuitive/ natural, and I don't stress about it all day.
  • Dove0804
    Dove0804 Posts: 213 Member
    I've never tried WW, but wasn't the basic idea to simplify calorie counting and make it easier to do by making it "points" instead? So if you're willing to calorie count, I really don't see why the more simplified, less accurate, and pricier way of doing it would be necessary at all. That's also extra work more restrictions for you.
  • DebSozo
    DebSozo Posts: 2,578 Member
    Dove0804 wrote: »
    I've never tried WW, but wasn't the basic idea to simplify calorie counting and make it easier to do by making it "points" instead? So if you're willing to calorie count, I really don't see why the more simplified, less accurate, and pricier way of doing it would be necessary at all. That's also extra work more restrictions for you.

    I think points are just a marketing ploy to make it seem like WW has an edge over calorie counting. I'm not sure that WW is simpler?
  • wizzybeth
    wizzybeth Posts: 3,578 Member
    edited May 2016
    I used the Flex Points system. And that one figured out the points based on 3 things: calories, fat, and fiber. I kept focusing on lower points food (food that was 3pts or less per serving) so I could "eat more" never realizing that the higher points foods like meats and higher fat foods would help with satiety not to mention just all around good health. To be fair the leader did emphasize eating a variety of foods including higher points options plus 2tsp of healthy oil a day, but many of us still focused on eating the lowest points foods with the lowest fat we could find. I was often hungry and miserable and didn't really "get" why.

    Plus all those "high fiber" foods that have been on shelves in the past 15 years or so - that's mostly due to cellulose fiber being added to food. Uh, basically sawdust. Which is why I dislike most store-bought bread - tastes awful...lol
  • cbelc2
    cbelc2 Posts: 762 Member
    You don't want to log twice, so choose one to log. Honestly, if you want to invest in WW, go ahead and use their tools. I never ate their chemical - laden food, but their ideas and tools are great. Meetings are fun and motivating. I stopped because I was starting to feel frustrated about all the WW food being pushed at us and advertised in meetings while the topic of conversation was about eating more whole fresh foods. I can motivate myself and use MFP.
  • InfoomaousTete
    InfoomaousTete Posts: 1,383 Member
    I never did WW, but I recently heard a story about a lady on WW who was gaining weight because raw fruits/veggies were free and she was eating about ten servings a day to help control her hunger! So say an apple is 100 calories, it doesn't take a genius to figure out 100x10=1000 extra calories a day...I wonder why she gained weight?? I'll keep to CICO and weighing my food any day and it's free!
  • size102b
    size102b Posts: 1,370 Member
    jajomo0118 wrote: »
    I never did WW, but I recently heard a story about a lady on WW who was gaining weight because raw fruits/veggies were free and she was eating about ten servings a day to help control her hunger! So say an apple is 100 calories, it doesn't take a genius to figure out 100x10=1000 extra calories a day...I wonder why she gained weight?? I'll keep to CICO and weighing my food any day and it's free!
    Fruit isn't free it's 0 sp you have to eat in moderation it you gain weight as anyone sensible knows you can't eat unlimited amounts of food without gaining weight
    An apple is 60 calories
    WW is better than calorie counting it's different now as its less carb more exercise based
    Don't knock what you've not done you can't give a report on anything unless you've tried it
  • size102b
    size102b Posts: 1,370 Member
    cbelc2 wrote: »
    You don't want to log twice, so choose one to log. Honestly, if you want to invest in WW, go ahead and use their tools. I never ate their chemical - laden food, but their ideas and tools are great. Meetings are fun and motivating. I stopped because I was starting to feel frustrated about all the WW food being pushed at us and advertised in meetings while the topic of conversation was about eating more whole fresh foods. I can motivate myself and use MFP.

    You don't HAVE to eat and if they're products I don't
    They're app is fantastic
    I've lost more on WW than mfp admittedly I hadnt in pro points but smart points is much better

    Chemical laden foods lol so you never eat processed foods drink alcohol or eat junk
  • wizzybeth
    wizzybeth Posts: 3,578 Member
    I disagree that WW is "better" than calorie counting - that's a very subjective opinion.

    It keeps you dependent on their tools ($$$)

    I like some of their pre-packaged foods (the ice cream treats are really yum) but most of their other stuff tastes like sawdust.

    I really think the best WW program they had was the FlexPoints. Fruits were 1 or 2 points each (bananas were 2 points). Most vegetables were 0 or 1 point except I think peas and corn because of the larger amount of sugar in those veggies. Most of the 0 points veggies were less than 25 calories per serving...hard to "overeat" on them because a serving is pretty darn big. You could eat liberally of fruits and vegetables without going crazy. Assigning 0 points to fruits was foolish IMHO and just asking for people to overindulge!! Fruits are much sweeter than veggies and thus, higher in calories.
  • randomtai
    randomtai Posts: 9,003 Member
    size102b wrote: »
    jajomo0118 wrote: »
    I never did WW, but I recently heard a story about a lady on WW who was gaining weight because raw fruits/veggies were free and she was eating about ten servings a day to help control her hunger! So say an apple is 100 calories, it doesn't take a genius to figure out 100x10=1000 extra calories a day...I wonder why she gained weight?? I'll keep to CICO and weighing my food any day and it's free!
    Fruit isn't free it's 0 sp you have to eat in moderation it you gain weight as anyone sensible knows you can't eat unlimited amounts of food without gaining weight
    An apple is 60 calories
    WW is better than calorie counting it's different now as its less carb more exercise based
    Don't knock what you've not done you can't give a report on anything unless you've tried it

    Uhhh... no it isn't.