We are pleased to announce that as of March 4, 2025, an updated Rich Text Editor has been introduced in the MyFitnessPal Community. To learn more about the changes, please click here. We look forward to sharing this new feature with you!
Is this healthy?

ahoy_m8
Posts: 3,054 Member
This article concludes: " Nutrition science is sometimes murky even to experts."
I found myself asking, "Murky" or "requires context"? Example: My oldest daughter recently asked, "What's the bottom line on cheese--good or bad? One word, no explanation." I gave her the unsatisfying "it depends." For someone who eats lentils and cabbage for lunch everyday (typical diet short on fat), it's good. For someone who eats a burger & fries for lunch every day (typical diet has too much fat), it's bad. As I read the article, I kept thinking the same would be true for any of these foods. Plus, any of these foods would be "healthy" to a starving Venezuelan (literally starving, i.e. too few calories to sustain life long term).
I wonder if studies (and articles about them like this one) do more to obfuscate than to clarify. In fairness, it did also say overall diet matters more than rigid rules around "good" and "bad" foods. I did enjoy the article, but I think I would have enjoyed a critique of the study more than the summary of it. I'm interested in observations of other MFP-ers and other articles that perhaps do a better job.
url: http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/07/05/upshot/is-sushi-healthy-what-about-granola-where-americans-and-nutritionists-disagree.html
I found myself asking, "Murky" or "requires context"? Example: My oldest daughter recently asked, "What's the bottom line on cheese--good or bad? One word, no explanation." I gave her the unsatisfying "it depends." For someone who eats lentils and cabbage for lunch everyday (typical diet short on fat), it's good. For someone who eats a burger & fries for lunch every day (typical diet has too much fat), it's bad. As I read the article, I kept thinking the same would be true for any of these foods. Plus, any of these foods would be "healthy" to a starving Venezuelan (literally starving, i.e. too few calories to sustain life long term).
I wonder if studies (and articles about them like this one) do more to obfuscate than to clarify. In fairness, it did also say overall diet matters more than rigid rules around "good" and "bad" foods. I did enjoy the article, but I think I would have enjoyed a critique of the study more than the summary of it. I'm interested in observations of other MFP-ers and other articles that perhaps do a better job.
url: http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/07/05/upshot/is-sushi-healthy-what-about-granola-where-americans-and-nutritionists-disagree.html
1
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 394.5K Introduce Yourself
- 44K Getting Started
- 260.5K Health and Weight Loss
- 176.1K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.7K Fitness and Exercise
- 444 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153.1K Motivation and Support
- 8.1K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 4.1K MyFitnessPal Information
- 16 News and Announcements
- 1.3K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.8K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions