Am I eating enough?

TavistockToad

People were saying that running 4 miles a day 6 days a week was too much.

It is if you're not eating any exercise calories back... If you want any muscle left what so ever, you need to eat more!

trogalicious

People were saying that running 4 miles a day 6 days a week was too much.

That is nuts. That is not too much running. The key is fueling your body for it. I would be so tired if I worked out a bunch and only ate 1200 calories.

the point that was being made is this:

It's not that running is the problem. If the OP isn't eating enough, then it's too much. You have to fuel the body properly. If you're running 24 miles a week, that's awesome, but you have to make sure you're not creating too large of a caloric deficit, which was the implication.

jlapey

At the very least, if you are following MFP guidelines, you should be eating back your exercise calories. Your deficit was already calculated when you chose "sedentary" as your activity level. Anytime you exercise, you are increasing that deficit with activity not already accounted for. Therefore your body needs more to fuel that activity. Your NET calories at the end of the day should be 1200 not less. 1200 is the absolute minimum, NOT MAXIMUM, (and is usually too low for most people) you are allowed to eat. It's okay to go over.

Edited to add:

Here is a good page of links with useful info from established, successful MFP members backed up with references. Hopefully, this will clear some confusion and get you on the right track. Good luck to you.

http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/833026-important-posts-to-read

this one is good too:

http://www.myfitnesspal.com/blog/Robin_Bin

likitisplit

MFP isn't about trying to eat the fewest possible number of calories. It's about learning to eat at a healthy level for your body - not too much and not too little.

So you do need to eat all of your base calories and at least half of your exercise calories.

quill16

I would never go below 1200 calories and my entire weight loss and also now a year of maintenance is based on a 1200 allotment. I do not eat back my exercise calories. I maintain between 130 and 140 lbs (I am 5'3" and 57 yrs old) Whenever I over indulge and gain back weight I go back to 1200 calories to get to my low and then 1400-1500 to maintain. I exercise quite a bit. I am running for 5 miles a day (45 min) and swim for 1 hour 6 days a week . I also add in strength training(weights floor exercise) 3 days a week. This works for me. I would go with what works for you unless your doctor says different. My doctor is very pleased with my routine:happy:

janegeraldine

I would never go below 1200 calories and my entire weight loss and also now a year of maintenance is based on a 1200 allotment. I do not eat back my exercise calories. I maintain between 130 and 140 lbs (I am 5'3" and 57 yrs old) Whenever I over indulge and gain back weight I go back to 1200 calories to get to my low and then 1400-1500 to maintain. I exercise quite a bit. I am running for 5 miles a day (45 min) and swim for 1 hour 6 days a week . I also add in strength training(weights floor exercise) 3 days a week. This works for me. I would go with what works for you unless your doctor says different. My doctor is very pleased with my routine:happy:

This is also my approach. I am not at maintenance phase yet, but I expect to be around 1700 calories for maintenance. This works for a lot of people. I am sure you feel healthy and capable and strong with this plan.

wilsoje74

People were saying that running 4 miles a day 6 days a week was too much.

It's not too much unless it starts to bother you. I know I need to take days off between runs or my knees and ankles will bother me. I think you need to eat your exercise cals back too. You can exercise all you want but it's set up for you to eat those calories.

unoriginalusername007

I think people freak out over the idea of eating lower calorie and buy into the starvation mode story because it makes them feel better about eating more.

No freak out here - but personally, I'd rather keep my muscle and lose the fat, not the other way around, which were my results when I was eating that standard 1200 cals a day. Plus I was irritable, tired, lacked energy for workouts, and was hangry (hungry + angry because I was hungry ).

I don't need to "feel better about eating more" like it needs to be justified or something - i DO feel better eating more because by doing so my body is well fueled for workouts, burns fat efficiently rather than wanting to store it, and while doing so I lost more inches, fat and overall weight, dropping several clothing sizes and looking and feeling better than I have in years!

So heck yeah, I feel better about eating more! If I can lose the fat, look and feel awesome while eating 1800 cals a day, why on earth would I drop to 1200? Food is fuel, and I like it! :drinker:

Amen to this!!

To the OP, you asked if you're eating enough, and I honestly think with the amount of exercise you get, that you aren't eating enough. However, that's totally from my perspective. I know my body would not be properly fueled with that amount of food and that I'd be more exhausted and worn out from my workouts that way, than if I'd eaten more calories to fuel my body- like 1700. But that's me! So I'm not going to judge you if you feel fine on 1200. After a long enough period of time, you might experience the effects of eating so little while still burning a lot, so I don't think it's the healthiest approach if you aren't eating back at least some of what you exercise, but to each his/her own. We all are different and have our different views on this matter, so I really can't tell you what to do. Do what feels right for you!

Good luck!