M&M minis - a life saver
Rage_Phish
Posts: 1,507 Member
these are incredible. they taste like real M&M's, but are much smaller so low cal.
y'all should get on these
4
Replies
-
this is not an ad for candywarehouse. i didjnt notice that stupid thing there
but for real, low cal m&m's
game changer0 -
Silly. Those are M&Ms.
There are Lifesavers:
20 -
i said "life saver". its a colloquialism. i was a bit worried about using it as i know we have some international members on the board
very different1 -
But... they're not low calorie. They're the same calorie content as regular M&M's by volume, as they're the exact same except smaller. The only difference is if you're counting by M&M number, which you shouldn't be.
ETA: Unless this was a joke post, in which case that flew right past me because you never know.6 -
no if i eat 30 m&m's, its more cal than 30 mini m&m's, there for low cal0
-
This content has been removed.
-
Rage_Phish wrote: »i said "life saver". its a colloquialism. i was a bit worried about using it as i know we have some international members on the board
very different
9 -
Lol I guess if it tricks you into thinking you're eating more for less...0
-
IKR, Last time I ordered a pizza, they asked whether to cut it into 6 slices or 8. I told them 6, since I'm cutting. (When I bulk, I have them slice it into 8)18
-
Is this like that old "fat weighs more than muscle" (or is it the other way around?) line?
Do I need to state the obvious here for the OP regarding the caloric value per gram for both types of M&M?2 -
Yeah..... they're low calorie until some woman (like me) with PMS unhinges her jaw and swallows the whole bag. Thanks for sharing!7
-
wut4
-
IKR, Last time I ordered a pizza, they asked whether to cut it into 6 slices or 8. I told them 6, since I'm cutting. (When I bulk, I have them slice it into 8)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fkqg6HE888A
7 -
OMG! Thanks OP! Game changer. On nights like these when I'm having half a pizza for supper, I really don't need all the calories of 30 M&Ms. It's nice to know I can still have 30 (smaller) M&Ms guilt free!3
-
Lasmartchika wrote: »Rage_Phish wrote: »i said "life saver". its a colloquialism. i was a bit worried about using it as i know we have some international members on the board
very different
Did you post that gif in reference to yourself?0 -
Well done, Rage_Phish. Threads like these are a great reminder of the sharpness of our community.2
-
Also thanks for helping me decide I should spend my last 200 cals on peanut m&ms
But they were full size damn it. Haha1 -
Do the green ones really make you horny? I heard that once and I have been afraid to try them ever since.6
-
-
Looks like the bullies are out in full force tonight3
-
-
I was about to say "not if you eat 'em by the handful" but I guess everyone beat me to it.0
-
bump!
eating some now. no need to log cause they are so small
3 -
Alatariel75 wrote: »Silly. Those are M&Ms.
There are Lifesavers:
I wonder if an M&M's mini would fit into the center of a Lifesaver? Then it could be considered a "whole food" and probably be better for your health.3 -
Rage_Phish wrote: »bump!
eating some now. no need to log cause they are so small
So, because they're individually so small they contain no calories? <confused>0 -
snickerscharlie wrote: »Rage_Phish wrote: »bump!
eating some now. no need to log cause they are so small
So, because they're individually so small they contain no calories? <confused>
That's obviously how calories work. If you cut your food into tiny enough pieces, you wouldn't have to count any of it because each piece would contain no calories.5 -
snickerscharlie wrote: »Rage_Phish wrote: »bump!
eating some now. no need to log cause they are so small
So, because they're individually so small they contain no calories? <confused>
That's obviously how calories work. If you cut your food into tiny enough pieces, you wouldn't have to count any of it because each piece would contain no calories.
Thanks for clarifying.
0 -
snickerscharlie wrote: »snickerscharlie wrote: »Rage_Phish wrote: »bump!
eating some now. no need to log cause they are so small
So, because they're individually so small they contain no calories? <confused>
That's obviously how calories work. If you cut your food into tiny enough pieces, you wouldn't have to count any of it because each piece would contain no calories.
Thanks for clarifying.
Glad to help!
Now to go cut an entire cheesecake into M&M mini size.2 -
So bigger is not always better? :laugh:2
-
snickerscharlie wrote: »snickerscharlie wrote: »Rage_Phish wrote: »bump!
eating some now. no need to log cause they are so small
So, because they're individually so small they contain no calories? <confused>
That's obviously how calories work. If you cut your food into tiny enough pieces, you wouldn't have to count any of it because each piece would contain no calories.
Thanks for clarifying.
Glad to help!
Now to go cut an entire cheesecake into M&M mini size.
*runs off to find a cheesecake 0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 424 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions