Carb cycling
mahia_20
Posts: 15 Member
I'm thinking about starting carb cycling in the new year...need advice. How do I figure out how much protien/carbs I need per day for low carb and high carb days?
0
Replies
-
What I'd say is do your research properly and then explore what works for your body.
I carb cycle leading up to events - on-loading and offloading.
For week-to-week usefulness though - I find it's sometimes counter productive.
Have a play with your carb consumption and see what work and what puts you at your optimal.
What are your aims with it?
What's the rational behind it for you?0 -
I want to try it for about a month for leaner more toned look. I've been weight training for 2 years and would like to reduce body fat (currently at 18%).0
-
I want to try it for about a month for leaner more toned look. I've been weight training for 2 years and would like to reduce body fat (currently at 18%).
I'm thinking you may be misunderstanding the actual benefits to carb cycling - which is fine, it's normal. It's a very misunderstood subject.
What you're essentially doing is playing with the levels of glycogen in your system, particularly useful for maximising the storage capacity leading up to an event that needs an extended release of glycogen - such as marathons or endurance competitions.
As for carb cycling for body composition - I'm yet to see a study that proves is particularly effective(other than standard cycling that just about everybody into body modding does - varying consumption of macros over time).
What your essentially speaking of doing is a varied ketonic state, when you're in low carb and then going back to 'normal'.
I'm just trying to see where the benefit will be for you - I'm all for trying things if they're safe and will help but, I'm really not convinced it will.
Your call in the end but definitely do your research!1 -
Anything I have read so far states that carb cycling is very useful in weight loss plateaus, which is exactly what I'm looking for...
0 -
Have you been counting macros for a while already?
If not I would suggest you start there- with one set of macro numbers, and get comfortable/consistent with that before you try to have multiple sets of numbers to try to hit.1 -
I haven't been tracking exact numbers but have maintained a relatively low carb diet on a daily basis, just want to try something new and hopefully more effective0
-
Anything I have read so far states that carb cycling is very useful in weight loss plateaus, which is exactly what I'm looking for...
At the end of the day you have to decide if you believe in actual science or 'broscience'.
I work from actual science with the things I do and I always recommend people find articles from reputable sources because there is a LOT of misinformation on the internet!
All the best with whatever you do either way!
Always good to try new things and see what works for you - just be open to people's views and opinions in the process of forming your own opinion.
Sometimes it's harder to read/hear what we need to hear instead of what we want to hear.1 -
Anything I have read so far states that carb cycling is very useful in weight loss plateaus, which is exactly what I'm looking for...
If you're in an extended plateau you probably just lost enough weight to now be at maintenance. Cut a few more calories or get more time in at the gym and you'll keep losing.1 -
I haven't been tracking exact numbers but have maintained a relatively low carb diet on a daily basis, just want to try something new and hopefully more effective
I would suggest that you address the bold part first as that's highly likely to be the culprit rather than the distribution of carbohydrate day to day.4 -
I haven't been tracking exact numbers but have maintained a relatively low carb diet on a daily basis, just want to try something new and hopefully more effective
I would suggest that you address the bold part first as that's highly likely to be the culprit rather than the distribution of carbohydrate day to day.
Carb cycling is not magic. Your overall calorie intake will dictate your weight changes.4 -
Just google "carb cycling for beginners" and you should be able to find something to read.
I tried it...for about 2 weeks. I found it to be a pain in the rear. It wasn't for me. I didn't like the way it made me feel nor did I like trying to keep up with what day it was...high carb or low carb...eat this but not that.
If you try it...hope that you like it and it works for you.0 -
Hi - you can always google Chris and Heidi Powell - they are big proponents of carb cycling. Good Luck!
1 -
Thanks for the helpful advice, I know it will be difficult as I have 2 young kids and work 12 hrs but worth a try. BTW not looking for "magic", just looking to focus on diet changes.0
-
Check Chris and Heidi Powell's website and books for Carb Cycling..for those that are not believers please watch a few episodes of Extreme Transformation, carb cycling is very effective for their clients.1
-
Check Chris and Heidi Powell's website and books for Carb Cycling..for those that are not believers please watch a few episodes of Extreme Transformation, carb cycling is very effective for their clients.
Carb cycling can be a very effective tool for many people, no different than other clients, but outside of improving compliance for some, its not magic. Having said that Mike Matthews also has some good information on it. But it wont increase fat loss if calories are equal.
https://www.muscleforlife.com/the-definitive-guide-to-carb-cycling/
3 -
Carb cycling is for pro athletes / bodybuilders / physique competitor short term training regimen that has been adopted as a point of difference marketing tool by people who make money out of packaging up miracles for weight loss
Also 18% body fat on a woman is already in the "underfat" territory
Maybe you need to look at body recomposition through progressive resistance if you are still unhappy with your physicality
Good luck1 -
Carb cycling is for pro athletes / bodybuilders / physique competitor short term training regimen that has been adopted as a point of difference marketing tool by people who make money out of packaging up miracles for weight loss
Also 18% body fat on a woman is already in the "underfat" territory
Maybe you need to look at body recomposition through progressive resistance if you are still unhappy with your physicality
Good luck
Women dont have issues until under 14%. 18% is considered to be athletic.0 -
Carb cycling is for pro athletes / bodybuilders / physique competitor short term training regimen that has been adopted as a point of difference marketing tool by people who make money out of packaging up miracles for weight loss
Also 18% body fat on a woman is already in the "underfat" territory
Maybe you need to look at body recomposition through progressive resistance if you are still unhappy with your physicality
Good luck
Women dont have issues until under 14%. 18% is considered to be athletic.
0 -
Thank you! I'm NOT underweight in the least0
-
Carb cycling is for pro athletes / bodybuilders / physique competitor short term training regimen that has been adopted as a point of difference marketing tool by people who make money out of packaging up miracles for weight loss
Also 18% body fat on a woman is already in the "underfat" territory
Maybe you need to look at body recomposition through progressive resistance if you are still unhappy with your physicality
Good luck
Women dont have issues until under 14%. 18% is considered to be athletic.
This is the second time I've seen you posting similar to this @psuLemon
Having issues and being under what the WHO consider ideal / healthy is different. 18% is considered underfat.
Why are you suddenly promoting women being close to essential BF, it doesn't ring true with most of your, far more sensible, posts so it makes me feel like I'm missing something ...some crucial piece of research that negates the 21-33% staggered by age healthy BF levels I've seen across the board2 -
-
Carb cycling is for pro athletes / bodybuilders / physique competitor short term training regimen that has been adopted as a point of difference marketing tool by people who make money out of packaging up miracles for weight loss
Also 18% body fat on a woman is already in the "underfat" territory
Maybe you need to look at body recomposition through progressive resistance if you are still unhappy with your physicality
Good luck
Women dont have issues until under 14%. 18% is considered to be athletic.
This is the second time I've seen you posting similar to this @psuLemon
Having issues and being under what the WHO consider ideal / healthy is different. 18% is considered underfat.
Why are you suddenly promoting women being close to essential BF, it doesn't ring true with most of your, far more sensible, posts so it makes me feel like I'm missing something ...some crucial piece of research that negates the 21-33% staggered by age healthy BF levels I've seen across the boardCarb cycling is for pro athletes / bodybuilders / physique competitor short term training regimen that has been adopted as a point of difference marketing tool by people who make money out of packaging up miracles for weight loss
Also 18% body fat on a woman is already in the "underfat" territory
Maybe you need to look at body recomposition through progressive resistance if you are still unhappy with your physicality
Good luck
Women dont have issues until under 14%. 18% is considered to be athletic.
This is the second time I've seen you posting similar to this @psuLemon
Having issues and being under what the WHO consider ideal / healthy is different. 18% is considered underfat.
Why are you suddenly promoting women being close to essential BF, it doesn't ring true with most of your, far more sensible, posts so it makes me feel like I'm missing something ...some crucial piece of research that negates the 21-33% staggered by age healthy BF levels I've seen across the board
anecdotally, i started to lose my period around 17%... so... just sayin1 -
OP, I agree that you're majoring in the minors here. Switch your focus to actually tracking calories and macronutrients successfully FIRST.
Low carb/carb cycling is not going to be more helpful for you than just knowing the proper amount of calories you're eating.1 -
I agree with rainbow. I only carb cycle at the very end of a cut. Or else you will likely burnout rather quickly. It's much more useful for fine-tuning.0
-
Okay...am I missing something. The below according to MFP's BMI calculator for a 64 y/o woman at 5' 6"
Under less than 18.5
Healthy 18.5-25.0
Over 25.0-30.0
Obese 30.0 and above
If I am making the correct assumptions WHO's suggested BMIs are much different...drastically.
Surely I am looking at this wrong.
0 -
Okay...am I missing something. The below according to MFP's BMI calculator for a 64 y/o woman at 5' 6"
Under less than 18.5
Healthy 18.5-25.0
Over 25.0-30.0
Obese 30.0 and above
If I am making the correct assumptions WHO's suggested BMIs are much different...drastically.
Surely I am looking at this wrong.
Those are BMI = height / weight
We are talking about body fat percentage
It's different
2 -
Okay...am I missing something. The below according to MFP's BMI calculator for a 64 y/o woman at 5' 6"
Under less than 18.5
Healthy 18.5-25.0
Over 25.0-30.0
Obese 30.0 and above
If I am making the correct assumptions WHO's suggested BMIs are much different...drastically.
Surely I am looking at this wrong.
BMI= Body Mass Index
BF%= Body Fat percentage0 -
Carb cycling is for pro athletes / bodybuilders / physique competitor short term training regimen that has been adopted as a point of difference marketing tool by people who make money out of packaging up miracles for weight loss
Also 18% body fat on a woman is already in the "underfat" territory
Maybe you need to look at body recomposition through progressive resistance if you are still unhappy with your physicality
Good luck
Women dont have issues until under 14%. 18% is considered to be athletic.
This is the second time I've seen you posting similar to this @psuLemon
Having issues and being under what the WHO consider ideal / healthy is different. 18% is considered underfat.
Why are you suddenly promoting women being close to essential BF, it doesn't ring true with most of your, far more sensible, posts so it makes me feel like I'm missing something ...some crucial piece of research that negates the 21-33% staggered by age healthy BF levels I've seen across the board
I guess the standards and classifications from the WHO and other groups are not aligned. This is from the Amercian College of Sports Medicine.
I find it fascinating consider essential fats are sub 14% for women.0 -
Carb cycling is for pro athletes / bodybuilders / physique competitor short term training regimen that has been adopted as a point of difference marketing tool by people who make money out of packaging up miracles for weight loss
Also 18% body fat on a woman is already in the "underfat" territory
Maybe you need to look at body recomposition through progressive resistance if you are still unhappy with your physicality
Good luck
Women dont have issues until under 14%. 18% is considered to be athletic.
This is the second time I've seen you posting similar to this @psuLemon
Having issues and being under what the WHO consider ideal / healthy is different. 18% is considered underfat.
Why are you suddenly promoting women being close to essential BF, it doesn't ring true with most of your, far more sensible, posts so it makes me feel like I'm missing something ...some crucial piece of research that negates the 21-33% staggered by age healthy BF levels I've seen across the board
I guess the standards and classifications from the WHO and other groups are not aligned. This is from the Amercian College of Sports Medicine.
I find it fascinating consider essential fats are sub 14% for women.
That's scary
Considering symptoms that can occur in women sub 18-20
And that essential BF % is 11-13 which means risk of fatality
I think I will stick with WHO and other sources I find more credible until I see some kind of science behind pretty tables
And I will continue to comment if I see people posting that anything sub 21% is any kind of ideal for women.
Because I really believe, hand on heart, that's dangerous, and potentially promoting ED and body dysmorphia for the vast majority of women e.g. Non pro-athletes / bodybuilders (inc physique competitors)0 -
Can you provide any source studies to back up those charts?
Not picking
Just very concerned0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions