Trying to get an accurate body fat measurement

jswigart

I have been trying to measure my body fat percentage with a set of digital calipers I recently obtained.
I am using the 3 point method. Measuring the chest, abdomen, and thigh.
My best guess with the calculations is that I am about 7.1% body fat. However I cannot get a consistent measurement. It seems that I can be inconsistent as much as 1mm each time I take a measurement.
Is there a better way, (without extremely expensive equipment) to do this?
Is there a method of using the calibers that will create more consistancy?
Thanks j

singletrackmtbr

Practice makes perfect. There's definitely a learning curve. A couple of things:
I prefer the 7 point calculator to the 3 point for a better representation.
To use the 7 point you will need another person to measure you, ideally the same person each time.
Until you get really good you can take 3 measurements of a site and use the average in your calculations.
Take photos to go along with measurements. It will help you to get an idea of what each number really looks like and provide a bit of quality control in the long run.

Good luck!

Azdak

If you are in the 7% BF range, there is not that much variability. Are you expecting to be able to differentiate between 6.5% and 7.2%? That's not going to happen.

Even for hydrostatic weighing, the actual protocol calls for performing 10 measurements and taking something like the closest 4 and averaging them.

At your level of BF, calipers are usually the measuring method of choice. You would get a tad more consistency if another person took the measurements, esp someone with a lot of experience. But, unlike females, males can do a decent job of pinching themselves.

ninerbuff

As mentioned by Azdak, the difference in percentage is going to be 1%-2% at most. I know that 1% may sound like a lot, but if you're under double digits, it only really matters if you're competing in bodybuilding contests.

A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
IDEA Fitness member
Kickboxing Certified Instructor
Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

WalkingDeadFrank

singletrackmtbr wrote: »

Practice makes perfect. There's definitely a learning curve. A couple of things:
I prefer the 7 point calculator to the 3 point for a better representation.
To use the 7 point you will need another person to measure you, ideally the same person each time.
Until you get really good you can take 3 measurements of a site and use the average in your calculations.
Take photos to go along with measurements. It will help you to get an idea of what each number really looks like and provide a bit of quality control in the long run.

Good luck!

Agreed...the 7 point calculation is more accurate.

Frank

WalkingDeadFrank

jswigart wrote: »

I have been trying to measure my body fat percentage with a set of digital calipers I recently obtained.
I am using the 3 point method. Measuring the chest, abdomen, and thigh.
My best guess with the calculations is that I am about 7.1% body fat. However I cannot get a consistent measurement. It seems that I can be inconsistent as much as 1mm each time I take a measurement.
Is there a better way, (without extremely expensive equipment) to do this?
Is there a method of using the calibers that will create more consistancy?
Thanks j

First thing in the morning do the 7 point calculator and it's never going to be 100% perfect.

That being said superman, you're at 7% BF plus or minus about 1-1.5%, I wouldn't worry to much about that unless you're going into a bodybuilding contest.

Frank

Azdak

WalkingDeadFrank wrote: »

singletrackmtbr wrote: »

Practice makes perfect. There's definitely a learning curve. A couple of things:
I prefer the 7 point calculator to the 3 point for a better representation.
To use the 7 point you will need another person to measure you, ideally the same person each time.
Until you get really good you can take 3 measurements of a site and use the average in your calculations.
Take photos to go along with measurements. It will help you to get an idea of what each number really looks like and provide a bit of quality control in the long run.

Good luck!

Agreed...the 7 point calculation is more accurate.

Frank

I don't have the reference at hand, so feel free to dismiss this, but for those at lower (under 20% males) body fat levels, the 3-site method, performed by an experienced practioner is as accurate as 7-site, and almost as accurate as hydrostatic weighing.

WalkingDeadFrank

Either way, this guy is really fit (low BF) and even if his results are off .5-1%, it won't make much of a difference, look wise.

Frank

jswigart

Thanks guys for taking time to comment. I appreciate your input.
Yes for the first time in my life (I'm 61 years young) I do feel good and fit. When I started with MFP I was 245 lbs and 5'6".
Now I have lost 100 lbs and work out daily.
What I am trying to do now is gain muscle. I'm trying to discern between muscle weight gain and fat weight gain.
Thanks and Merry Christmas. Jay