MFP- Logging Food

brewer054
brewer054 Posts: 32 Member
edited November 2024 in Health and Weight Loss
After completing my food intake for yesterday, it told me that I was undereating. However, I'm not hungry. Should I just eat more anyways, so I can get my calories in or just eat when I'm hungry?

Replies

  • crzycatlady1
    crzycatlady1 Posts: 1,930 Member
    brewer054 wrote: »
    After completing my food intake for yesterday, it told me that I was undereating. However, I'm not hungry. Should I just eat more anyways, so I can get my calories in or just eat when I'm hungry?

    By how much? And how are your weekly averages? I go by that vs daily.
  • rainbowbow
    rainbowbow Posts: 7,490 Member
    I would say first of all, make sure that your logging is correct 100%. Many will say "Yes! eat more!" but i think this can be an issue if you're new to logging and already under-estimating your total calorie intake (which is incredibly easy to do).

    If your logging is accurate and you are weighing and counting everything, then yes, go ahead and try to hit the minimum 1,200 calorie goal for women. Realize that a small reduction in calories (20-25%) is generally sufficient for weight loss and a large calorie deficit is not necessary.
  • brewer054
    brewer054 Posts: 32 Member
    brewer054 wrote: »
    After completing my food intake for yesterday, it told me that I was undereating. However, I'm not hungry. Should I just eat more anyways, so I can get my calories in or just eat when I'm hungry?

    By how much? And how are your weekly averages? I go by that vs daily.

    Well, yesterday after my trip to the gym it was a difference of 900 or so calories.
  • silverfiend
    silverfiend Posts: 329 Member
    edited December 2016
    MFP doesn't look at exercise calories when giving you that "not eating enough" warning. It's looking at the actual calories you said you eat that day.
  • crzycatlady1
    crzycatlady1 Posts: 1,930 Member
    brewer054 wrote: »
    brewer054 wrote: »
    After completing my food intake for yesterday, it told me that I was undereating. However, I'm not hungry. Should I just eat more anyways, so I can get my calories in or just eat when I'm hungry?

    By how much? And how are your weekly averages? I go by that vs daily.

    Well, yesterday after my trip to the gym it was a difference of 900 or so calories.

    That's a big difference-how many calories did you actually eat? I tried looking at your food diary but it's not open to public. One low day here or there isn't going to really hurt anything (I intentionally eat lower calories during my week days and then eat higher on the weekends), but if you're trending over a week's time that much under, that's not a good thing.
  • rainbowbow
    rainbowbow Posts: 7,490 Member
    brewer054 wrote: »
    brewer054 wrote: »
    After completing my food intake for yesterday, it told me that I was undereating. However, I'm not hungry. Should I just eat more anyways, so I can get my calories in or just eat when I'm hungry?

    By how much? And how are your weekly averages? I go by that vs daily.

    Well, yesterday after my trip to the gym it was a difference of 900 or so calories.

    And how did you calculate this 900 calorie burn?
  • Papatoad194
    Papatoad194 Posts: 251 Member
    If for the most part you are at least hitting 1200-1500 Cals. ( like 5-6 days) I wouldn't worry about a day here and there under. If you are consistently below that. You may want to share your diary with some folks who will hold you accountable to good choices. ~ Make good choices :)
  • brewer054
    brewer054 Posts: 32 Member
    rainbowbow wrote: »
    brewer054 wrote: »
    brewer054 wrote: »
    After completing my food intake for yesterday, it told me that I was undereating. However, I'm not hungry. Should I just eat more anyways, so I can get my calories in or just eat when I'm hungry?

    By how much? And how are your weekly averages? I go by that vs daily.

    Well, yesterday after my trip to the gym it was a difference of 900 or so calories.

    And how did you calculate this 900 calorie burn?

    Not 900 calorie burn; I meant 900 calories was the difference that I still needed to eat.
  • rainbowbow
    rainbowbow Posts: 7,490 Member
    brewer054 wrote: »
    rainbowbow wrote: »
    brewer054 wrote: »
    brewer054 wrote: »
    After completing my food intake for yesterday, it told me that I was undereating. However, I'm not hungry. Should I just eat more anyways, so I can get my calories in or just eat when I'm hungry?

    By how much? And how are your weekly averages? I go by that vs daily.

    Well, yesterday after my trip to the gym it was a difference of 900 or so calories.

    And how did you calculate this 900 calorie burn?

    Not 900 calorie burn; I meant 900 calories was the difference that I still needed to eat.

    Oh, okay. Some information we'll need.
    Height:
    Weight:
    Goal Weight:
    Calorie Goal:
    What you're actually eating:
  • jmp463
    jmp463 Posts: 266 Member
    Why would you eat if you dont want to??? Who cares what the app says? I love the nights when I dont feel like eating - I wish I had more of those.
  • TR0berts
    TR0berts Posts: 7,739 Member
    jmp463 wrote: »
    Why would you eat if you dont want to??? Who cares what the app says? I love the nights when I dont feel like eating - I wish I had more of those.

    Because she (or whomever, for that matter) may not be getting adequate nutrition, which could lead to any number of health issues.
  • TeaBea
    TeaBea Posts: 14,517 Member
    jmp463 wrote: »
    Why would you eat if you dont want to??? Who cares what the app says? I love the nights when I dont feel like eating - I wish I had more of those.

    Eating too little on a consistent basis does not help your body fuel existing lean muscle mass efficiently. So under eating may speed up "weight" loss.....but you are not lowering your body fat % by as much as you could have.

    Who wants to get to goal and still look all soft & doughy? No, thanks.
  • malibu927
    malibu927 Posts: 17,562 Member
    TeaBea wrote: »
    jmp463 wrote: »
    Why would you eat if you dont want to??? Who cares what the app says? I love the nights when I dont feel like eating - I wish I had more of those.

    Eating too little on a consistent basis does not help your body fuel existing lean muscle mass efficiently. So under eating may speed up "weight" loss.....but you are not lowering your body fat % by as much as you could have.

    Who wants to get to goal and still look all soft & doughy? No, thanks.

    Not to mention it can cause issues in the hair, nails, energy, reproductive organs, hormones, heart, brain...
This discussion has been closed.