Setting macros
glowgirl14
Posts: 200 Member
Ok, so I'm going to try the TDEE/IIFYM approach...I've been stuck for a while within a ten pound range, and would like to lose more. Seems I'm not eating enough. I sometimes hit my goal (which apparently is too low to begin with) and any calories I burned in exercise were just more of a deficit...(Ex. My goal was 1200, and I would try to come in under that...and if I ate 1100, and burned 300 in exercise, I would count that day a success - with a 400 calorie defecit.) More calories burned, more weight lost...except I wasn't losing.
So. I've done my BMR using the Katch McArdle formula, (Using my current weight as my goal, as suggested in another thread.) It's 1332. And here's where I'm confused. I know I'm supposed to set a deficit, and eat the extra calories I burn in exercise. But how do I set this up? I would consider myself sedentary, but I just got a fitbit, and I guess I'm not. Do I just pick an activity modifier, and go for it...and adjust in a week if I'm doing more/less? What if I set a goal of, say, 1500 calories, and my fitbit says I burned 2500? From what I'm reading, that's too much of a deficit. So I should eat more, to account for the extra calories burned...where do those "extra" calories fit into the macros?
I'm sorry if I sound like an idiot. This seems like such a simple approach, if I can get my numbers figured out.
Help?
So. I've done my BMR using the Katch McArdle formula, (Using my current weight as my goal, as suggested in another thread.) It's 1332. And here's where I'm confused. I know I'm supposed to set a deficit, and eat the extra calories I burn in exercise. But how do I set this up? I would consider myself sedentary, but I just got a fitbit, and I guess I'm not. Do I just pick an activity modifier, and go for it...and adjust in a week if I'm doing more/less? What if I set a goal of, say, 1500 calories, and my fitbit says I burned 2500? From what I'm reading, that's too much of a deficit. So I should eat more, to account for the extra calories burned...where do those "extra" calories fit into the macros?
I'm sorry if I sound like an idiot. This seems like such a simple approach, if I can get my numbers figured out.
Help?
0
Replies
-
If you rFitBit says you are burning 2500 a day and your BMR is 1350 then pick a place inbetween. You need to eat more than your BMR and less than your TDEE. You also need to give the whole process at least a month before you decide it isn't working. You've been seriously under eating so your body is going to have a knee jerk response if you up your calories to start replenishing lost glycogen stores and you may gain a few pounds.
You don't have a lot left to lose so having a 1,000 calorie a day deficit is too much, that's a 2 lb a week setting. I don't totally believe FitBit's for accuracy on calorie burn though. I wouldn't worry too much about macros. Probably your best bet is to just use MFP's setting for 1 lb/week or even .5 lb/week and add any intentional exercise separately. It's up to your whether you chose to eat those calories.0 -
Here's where I get frustrated. I "don't have a lot to lose". But I suspect that my lack of exercise/muscle tone is making me way much less than if I were really toned. When I do the waist/height ratio and waist/hip ratio, I'm still in the "normal" range, but on the high end. And my body fat percentage is larger than I'd like as well. I don't want to be super skinny...But I know that I have a propensity for gaining weight when I don't watch.
I also have a good friend who is a nutritionist, and she told me that when we are adolescents and while we are pregnant, we make new fat cells. As an adolescent, I was always on the go, and so I progressed like a healthy adolescent. My first pregnancy came just after I lost 45lbs...and I ate like I was trying to replenish all the calories I didn't eat when losing. I gained 75lbs with my pregnancy, and it all went to my hips and tummy. So, I'm a "healthy weight" for my height, but my stomach is enormous compared to the rest of me. I am trying to refocus at the moment. Get some cardio in...something I am conscious of, not just my normal activities of cleaning house and chasing kids...and do some toning. I know that will make me gain weight, as muscle. But I know when I was in high school, I weighed 120-125, and was way smaller than I am now at 130. The difference has to be muscle v. fat.
My question here is when do you put the exercise calories into the macros? I know a 1150 calorie deficit is too much, and I don't think I'm actually burning 2500 a day. I've upped my calorie goal here to 1450, and plan to eat more for what I burn. At this point, I would be okay if I lost half a pound a week. As long as I am making some progress. I just don't want to put some arbitrary number into my goal, and eat that for a month, and gain ten pound instead of lose or maintain.
I suppose the easy way to calculate would be to take my macros as percentages, and to eat any extra calories with those same percentages?0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 427 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions