potato...a thing...
Options

JaydedMiss
Posts: 4,286 Member
I love potatoes iv lost lots of weight eating lots of potatoes so this isnt a worry of mine im just curious because i just noticed something..
I took 314 grams of potato and microwaved it. Out of habit for some reason when i took it out i reweighed it (never done that before was on autopilot) It came to 244 grams. So it lost 70 grams in the microwave.
Now im going to log it as 314grams as i always have and i know it must just be water dissapearing, But just double checking, What would you log it as? 314? 244? somewhere in the middle?
I took 314 grams of potato and microwaved it. Out of habit for some reason when i took it out i reweighed it (never done that before was on autopilot) It came to 244 grams. So it lost 70 grams in the microwave.
Now im going to log it as 314grams as i always have and i know it must just be water dissapearing, But just double checking, What would you log it as? 314? 244? somewhere in the middle?
0
Replies
-
314. It didn't lose calories when it lost water.5
-
Yes...it just lost water while cooking...that doesn't reduce calories.0
-
Yes, a food loses water and fat (if applicable) during the cooking process. Hence the change in weight. There are both raw and cooked entries in the food database and since you weighed the potato both before and after cooking, which entry you choose is up to you.
That said, the amount of water (or fat) lost can vary depending on cooking time and method, so it's generally best to go with raw weights and raw database entries.
ETA: The amount of calories in your potato is still the same, but it's calories per gram is now different, obviously.3 -
This content has been removed.
-
If you're using the raw potato entry in the database, then it would be 314g.0
-
It's 314g of raw potato or 244g of cooked potato. If the entries are correct, the calories should be about the same.1
-
PaulaWallaDingDong wrote: »314. It didn't lose calories when it lost water.
Yup. Unfortunately you only cooked out water, not calories.0 -
I always use raw, flesh and skin entry for potatoes. The length of time you cook a vegetable will affect how much water is lost through cooking and will cause some variation in the final cooked weight if you choose to always weigh the finished product. There's some argument to be made that fresher produce weighs more than less fresh produce based on it dehydrating a bit as well.
I still try to err on the side of being as generous as I can with accounting for calories consumed, so I weigh everything raw.0 -
On a similar note I realised the other day I'd been weighing potatoes before I peeled them and there was about 40g difference0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 396.6K Introduce Yourself
- 44.2K Getting Started
- 260.8K Health and Weight Loss
- 176.3K Food and Nutrition
- 47.6K Recipes
- 232.8K Fitness and Exercise
- 449 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.7K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153.3K Motivation and Support
- 8.3K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.5K Chit-Chat
- 2.6K Fun and Games
- 4.5K MyFitnessPal Information
- 16 News and Announcements
- 18 MyFitnessPal Academy
- 1.4K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 3K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions