Welcome to Debate Club! Please be aware that this is a space for respectful debate, and that your ideas will be challenged here. Please remember to critique the argument, not the author.
not losing weight when you don't eat enough
Options
perkymommy
Posts: 1,642 Member
in Debate Club
It never makes sense to me when I hear someone say if I don't eat enough calories each day that I won't lose any weight. Why is it then that I go out and see homeless people on the streets that are so frail and small from not eating enough food? or the anorexic who starve themselves pretty much to be thin? I struggled with anorexia in my teen years and young adult years and remember how easy it was to lose the weight by simply not eating much. So it is very possible to lose weight when you don't eat enough every day.
2
Replies
-
The people claiming that are referring to "Starvation Mode" and stating that your body holds onto fat reserves when you starve it of calories. It's been proven untrue, and you're right with the examples you've given.8
-
People just resent the idea of eating less. "Starvation mode" is such a convenient excuse to not make an effort to lose weight.14
-
In the short term, it can be a thing. Caloric restriction is a stressor, which invokes cortisol response, which is often accompanied by an increase in aldosterone. This leads to water retention, which can make it appear that you are not losing fat.
It's basically the best explanation that has been found for why refeeds and diet breaks can break weight loss cessation. You eat more, your hormones balance out a bit, you spend a few days peeing like a race horse, your weight drops.6 -
kommodevaran wrote: »People just resent the idea of eating less. "Starvation mode" is such a convenient excuse to not make an effort to lose weight.
This!
Believe me, if you don't eat, you'll lose weight (and be totally unhealthy)!5 -
perkymommy wrote: »It never makes sense to me when I hear someone say if I don't eat enough calories each day that I won't lose any weight. Why is it then that I go out and see homeless people on the streets that are so frail and small from not eating enough food? or the anorexic who starve themselves pretty much to be thin? I struggled with anorexia in my teen years and young adult years and remember how easy it was to lose the weight by simply not eating much. So it is very possible to lose weight when you don't eat enough every day.
It doesn't make sense because people who say that don't have the slightest idea what they're talking about.
There is such a thing as metabolic adaptation, which can slow down the rate of weight loss for a number of reasons, but "starvation mode" is a huge, steaming pile of BS.10 -
Think it's a combination of things, lthough im pulling this out of my *kitten* and don't have any evidence, just hypotheses.
1. Water retention from cortisol, as mentioned above.
2. Just enough metabolic slow down that they're eating at maintenance. Biggest Loser effect.
3. They're lying about how much they're eating. Often the one they are lying to is themselves...2 -
Think it's a combination of things, lthough im pulling this out of my *kitten* and don't have any evidence, just hypotheses.
1. Water retention from cortisol, as mentioned above.
2. Just enough metabolic slow down that they're eating at maintenance. Biggest Loser effect.
3. They're lying about how much they're eating. Often the one they are lying to is themselves...
You're in the ballpark. A read to help understand it better: http://www.bodyrecomposition.com/fat-loss/another-look-at-metabolic-damage.html/
A choice excerpt:...Because in no study that i have ever seen or ever been aware of has the drop in metabolic rate (whether due to the drop in weight or adaptive component) EVER exceeded the actual deficit whether in men or women. Fine, yes, it may offset things, it may slow fat loss (i.e. if you set up a 30% caloric deficit and metabolic rate drops by 20%, your deficit is only 10% so fat loss is a lot slower than expected or predicted) but it has never been sufficient to either stop fat loss completely (or, even to address the even stupider claim being made about this, to cause actual fat gain)...
...Because the science doesn’t support it in any way shape or form. No study in humans in 50 years has ever shown the claimed phenomenon. I mean not ever. Not a single study showing truly stopped fat loss in the face of a controlled deficit much less fat regain. And with plenty of other mechanisms (like water retention) to explain the “apparent” lack of fat loss that make more logical sense (Occam’s razor for the win).4 -
perkymommy wrote: »It never makes sense to me when I hear someone say if I don't eat enough calories each day that I won't lose any weight. Why is it then that I go out and see homeless people on the streets that are so frail and small from not eating enough food? or the anorexic who starve themselves pretty much to be thin? I struggled with anorexia in my teen years and young adult years and remember how easy it was to lose the weight by simply not eating much. So it is very possible to lose weight when you don't eat enough every day.
It's just another excuse for not losing weight. I know, I've used just about all the excuses, and I also have an eating-disorder past.3 -
I hate the term starvation mode. The body is not starving. But adaptive thermogenesis is a real thing. And it doesn't make you so you stop losing...but it can slow the process.4
-
perkymommy wrote: »It never makes sense to me when I hear someone say if I don't eat enough calories each day that I won't lose any weight. Why is it then that I go out and see homeless people on the streets that are so frail and small from not eating enough food? or the anorexic who starve themselves pretty much to be thin? I struggled with anorexia in my teen years and young adult years and remember how easy it was to lose the weight by simply not eating much. So it is very possible to lose weight when you don't eat enough every day.
What you are experiencing is known (in secret circles) as logic. Be wary as using powers of observation, relying on data and reproducible facts may result in life altering changes. You will find yourself less susceptible of marketing and advertising as the disease progresses. Once you start using logic...there is not coming back.13 -
cushman5279 wrote: »kommodevaran wrote: »People just resent the idea of eating less. "Starvation mode" is such a convenient excuse to not make an effort to lose weight.
This!
Believe me, if you don't eat, you'll lose weight (and be totally unhealthy)!
^This
And you absolutely can, and will, starve to death if you do not eat.2 -
think of it this way ..if starvation mode is real, then why do people die of starvation...?3
-
Can we put a bunch of these people that claim that they "workouts lot and eat 1000cal a day but cant loose weight"on a reality tv show and make them eat as much as they say they do while working out?12
-
Can we put a bunch of these people that claim that they "workouts lot and eat 1000cal a day but cant loose weight"on a reality tv show and make them eat as much as they say they do while working out?
^ With the calorie intake properly weighed/measured, exercise levels standardized and no access to food other than at meals so there's no covert snacking going on.
I'd be willing to bet a considerable sum of money that the inability to lose weight under those conditions wouldn't be anywhere near as prevalent as it is on MFP.8 -
It doesn't make sense because it's not true.2
-
Can we put a bunch of these people that claim that they "workouts lot and eat 1000cal a day but cant loose weight"on a reality tv show and make them eat as much as they say they do while working out?
^ With the calorie intake properly weighed/measured, exercise levels standardized and no access to food other than at meals so there's no covert snacking going on.
I'd be willing to bet a considerable sum of money that the inability to lose weight under those conditions wouldn't be anywhere near as prevalent as it is on MFP.
I agree. Even my disabled, diabetic mom with Cushing's can and has successfully lost more than 170 lbs by adhering to a reasonable caloric deficit (2000 cal/day for the last 2 years).9 -
Correct and I think this is what people are either experiencing or referring to when they talk about starvation mode. AT can slow you enough that it might appear temporarily that you aren't losing weight, especially if combined with a cortisol response to lower caloric intake. One could go weeks without appearing to lose weight while eating a very low number of calories.Pale_Green wrote: »I hate the term starvation mode. The body is not starving. But adaptive thermogenesis is a real thing. And it doesn't make you so you stop losing...but it can slow the process.
3 -
It's also worth considering that losing a lot of weight while remaining healthy requires time. A diet that's too low in calories or nutrients probably isn't sustainable over time, at least not for most people. It's not healthy and you feel awful and can't wait to get back to "normal" eating. And even if it is temporarily sustainable, it doesn't take care of the problem of maintaining a healthy weight. So as a practical matter for most overweight people, eating far too few calories won't lead to long-term fat loss.0
-
It's also worth considering that losing a lot of weight while remaining healthy requires time. A diet that's too low in calories or nutrients probably isn't sustainable over time, at least not for most people. It's not healthy and you feel awful and can't wait to get back to "normal" eating. And even if it is temporarily sustainable, it doesn't take care of the problem of maintaining a healthy weight. So as a practical matter for most overweight people, eating far too few calories won't lead to long-term fat loss.
Pretty much. It's essentially a niche dieting strategy best left to those who A: know what they are doing, and B: have monk level self-control. Is that elitist of me? Yeap. It's also extremely realistic.2 -
JohnnyPenso wrote: »
Correct and I think this is what people are either experiencing or referring to when they talk about starvation mode. AT can slow you enough that it might appear temporarily that you aren't losing weight, especially if combined with a cortisol response to lower caloric intake. One could go weeks without appearing to lose weight while eating a very low number of calories.Pale_Green wrote: »I hate the term starvation mode. The body is not starving. But adaptive thermogenesis is a real thing. And it doesn't make you so you stop losing...but it can slow the process.
Most talking about starvation mode are just underestimating their intake. Fix the tracking and the weight loss picks back up.1
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.7K Introduce Yourself
- 43.5K Getting Started
- 259.7K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.6K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 395 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.7K Motivation and Support
- 7.8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.3K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 958 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.3K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions