5'2 women what are your measurements?

sam33a

HDBKLM wrote: »

sam33a wrote: »

HDBKLM wrote: »

sam33a wrote: »

This is a depressing thread. I've always known that I look much bigger than I weigh but it's quite shocking just how much bigger I am compared to others my weight. My measurements are huge in comparison to most people's on here. I'm 5'2 and weigh 138 lbs. Most of my weight is on my stomach. I wonder if it's because of all the crash diets I did when I was younger and then the rapid weight gain after or just lack of exercise. Perhaps a combination of those factors.

Without knowing your measurements this is a shot in the dark—though even if I knew I couldn't be conclusive—my first thought is low muscle mass? Since muscle is more dense than fat one would look smaller (and have smaller measurements) at the same weight if a greater percentage of the body mass were made up of muscle.

You wondered whether there could be a connection to past crash dieting, and I guess it's a possibility. When we lose weight we lose both fat and muscle, then when we gain weight we're mainly just gaining fat (unless of course the gain is due to something like weight lifting rather than overeating), so that muscle-to-fat ratio can become tilted over time if we yo-yo.

Thanks for your response. You're right. I do have very low muscle mass. No wonder my weight loss is extremely slow compared to others. I rarely exercise. Guess I need to start seriously thinking about my diet and begin following a proper exercise plan. I'm eating low calories but my food is very high-carb and very low in protein, that can't help.

Strictly on the eating front there's nothing wrong with high-carb-low-protein, but if you are going to start to incorporate exercise then I think you'll find it beneficial to add more protein. Protein is specifically important for muscle retention and growth, but aside from the biological benefits you may also experience psychological benefits to higher protein consumption that keep you motivated to go back to the gym (or wherever you end up doing your exercise), in the form of seeing more rapid improvements in performance, stamina, etc.

Cardio is good for fat loss and heart health but will have less impact on muscle retention/growth than some form of weight training—and when I talk about weights I don't mean the 3-pound hand weights people use during aerobics. My n=1 results in the 6 months since I started weight training is that even though I don't get big calorie burns from the lifting itself, I can now eat several hundred calories more per day than MFP predicts I can without putting on weight. Having more muscles burning their little internal motors all the time in the background of my life—i.e., even when I'm not exercising—has had a metabolic impact.

There are some great threads on the forums to point the way when you're ready to start investigating exercise plans. One is called something like 'Which lifting program is right for you', another is called 'Recomp'.

Thank you. I will make sure to look into those.

yogafunctions

5’2”
122 lbs (GW 115) But this may be impossible with all of the weight training
Chest 32
Ribs 25
Waist 25 (id like to get this to 24)
Hips 35 (id like to get this to 33 or 33)

Remember- you can weigh much less but have much larger measurements and vice versa. It comes down to the amount of muscle mass!

size102b

5 ft 2

CW 157 lbs

C 32 bra size ( 40 via tape measure over )
W 31
H 41

I was 218 lbs aug 2018

C 54
W 44
H 52

pandagalaxy

5'3"

CW 149.8lbs

Chest 36
Waist 31
Hips 38

StatChicBayes

107 lbs 4'11" (I'm quite a bit shorter)

Bra Size 32 (measurement under breasts), 34" across breasts
Waist 28
Hips 34

trying to get waist/hips lower reducing BF

Talan79

5”2, 118lbs
37, 25, 37

RelCanonical

RelCanonical wrote: »

5'1'', kind of in-between 5'1'' and 5'2'' if it helps lol.

138 pounds.
Bust 37 inches
Waist (narrowest part): 30 inches
Hips: 37 inches.

I'm pretty straight up and down, body-type wise. Maybe a little top heavy in the shoulders, but nothing dramatic.

Wow, I should be taking measurements more often to see progress, as "only" 14 pounds has made a chunk of difference. Here are my updated measurements:

124 pounds
Bust: 35 inches
Waist (narrowest part): 27 inches
Hips: 35 inches

therbold

I'm 5'0"
Chest is 34.5
Waist is 31.3
Hips are 35
CW is 138
GW is 118
I have always had a thick waist too, even when I weighed 105. I think it's because there's not much space between my last rib and the top of my hip bone. Sucks.

jeagogo

sdewey415 wrote: »

For chest, do we measure right under our breast or across?

Chest (bust) is around the largest part of your bust, usually at nipple level, with the tape measure parallel to the ground. Below the breasts would be the underbust measurement used by most bra manufacturers to determine bra band size (and compare to bust measurement to determine cup size).
Waist is the point on your torso where your body bends side to side, usually the smallest point on a woman's torso just below the bottom ribs.
Hips is generally measured as the fullest point around your hips and booty. High hip is around where your hipbone is.