Question about serving size
bringingsexyback2007
Posts: 79 Member
I have a can of chickpeas that says the serving size is half a cup (130g) which comes out to about 4.5 ounces a serving. The problem is, I drained all the liquid and rinsed them. The entire can of beans after weight 5.6 ounces. I don't really have an idea on how to calculate how much of a serving size I had because the can only shows the values for the entire can. Does anyone know?
0
Replies
-
I should also note, it says there are 3.5 servings in the can.0
-
Just wing it, dont get that critical1
-
Weigh the contents and divide by 3.5. That is one serving.1
-
Jthanmyfitnesspal wrote: »Weigh the contents and divide by 3.5. That is one serving.
I did do that, but the the calories, carbs, sodium, all of that would be different since it is starchy water.0 -
I get frustrated with canned beans too, but I eat them all the time. I have just taken to using the drop down for "1 container" rather than "1 serving" or 1/2 cup of beans and then breaking the container down to 1/3 or 1/4 portions after draining and rinsing. For most cans, it's about 240 grams after draining so it's a matter of deciding if I want 60g or 80g portions. It's probably not accurate either, but it's plenty good enough.
FYI same thing with canned tuna. I guess I just drain way more thoroughly than the manufacturer expects?1 -
5.6 oz of rinsed, drained chickpeas are about 216 calories according to the USDA.
https://ndb.nal.usda.gov/ndb/foods/show/4984?manu=&fgcd=Legumes and Legume Products&ds=Standard Reference
This exists as an MFP entry (use this text to search: Chickpeas (garbanzo beans, bengal gram), mature seeds, canned, drained, rinsed in tap water)
1 -
bringingsexyback2007 wrote: »Jthanmyfitnesspal wrote: »Weigh the contents and divide by 3.5. That is one serving.
I did do that, but the the calories, carbs, sodium, all of that would be different since it is starchy water.
Honestly, if you are worried about the calories in the "starchy water" that you rinse away, you are worrying too much. I'm sure it's something but it won't add up to anything worth thinking twice over. There is greater caloric uncertainty in the questions of the degree to which we actually absorb calories from fiber (answer: less than 100%, more than 0%) and that doesn't stop anyone from making a reasonable guess and moving on.1
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions