The science is in: exercise won’t help you lose much weight
Options
Replies
-
Doing steady state cardio jacks up my appetite like nothing else. HIIT and resistance training reduce it. I do agree that the type of exercise matters.
1 -
My regular 30-45 min workouts act as an appetite suppressant for me. No workout or a heavy workout? I struggle to stick to my plan, even accounting for the increased calorie allowance.3
-
I exercise a lot and I eat a lot. I've found a balance between my CI and CO. It's not the healthiest diet, but I am able to maintain a good weight, enjoy food that I like, and move my body in the ways that I like. When I don't exercise, because we are travelling or life gets in the way, I tend to gain weight but I also eat less because I'm not as hungry. I know the difference between real hunger and boredom hunger.0
-
Ironandwine69 wrote: »I can see that. People think " oh ,I worked out, I can eat more".
50 mile bike ride planned for tomorrow. Should I not eat more afterwards?4 -
NorthCascades wrote: »Ironandwine69 wrote: »I can see that. People think " oh ,I worked out, I can eat more".
50 mile bike ride planned for tomorrow. Should I not eat more afterwards?
I think it's more the "i went on the elliptical for 30 minutes so now i can enjoy this venti caramel frappuccino!"mindset
7 -
What's a SAD diet?0
-
scarlett_k wrote: »What's a SAD diet?
Standard American diet
Sugar and Diabetes
Pretty much interchangeable
3 -
0
-
You'll find much of this at the policy creation level. This is why broad reaching policies tend to fail simply due to the failure of recognizing that a person =/= population. This is the fatal flaw behind all broad reaching policies. For any strategy to be effective you must implement multiple tactics to suit the needs of the individual. Also note that many in public health discount the value of calorie counting, which adds to the problem.
Bear in mind the goal is not to produce athletes, but simply preventing people from becoming obese. For most people this takes nothing more than eating at a deficit/maintenance and putting in a bit more walking.
The average MFP user is leaps and bound ahead of the learning curve from the average consumer who has no clue what a serving size means other than what was put on their plate by their parents or what their restaurant serves them.5 -
heidishmidi wrote: »scarlett_k wrote: »What's a SAD diet?
Standard American diet
Sugar and Diabetes
Pretty much interchangeable
Ohhh thanks0 -
in other news, the earth revolves around the sun ...1
-
NorthCascades wrote: »Ironandwine69 wrote: »I can see that. People think " oh ,I worked out, I can eat more".
50 mile bike ride planned for tomorrow. Should I not eat more afterwards?
You get a cookie3 -
BrianSharpe wrote: »https://youtube.com/watch?v=VKs0oEIVOck
People forget there's two parts to eat less, move more......
LMAO0 -
Ironandwine69 wrote: »NorthCascades wrote: »Ironandwine69 wrote: »I can see that. People think " oh ,I worked out, I can eat more".
50 mile bike ride planned for tomorrow. Should I not eat more afterwards?
You get a cookie
... but I'm not allowed to eat it. Maybe it comes with a mat and frame!0 -
heidishmidi wrote: »NorthCascades wrote: »Ironandwine69 wrote: »I can see that. People think " oh ,I worked out, I can eat more".
50 mile bike ride planned for tomorrow. Should I not eat more afterwards?
I think it's more the "i went on the elliptical for 30 minutes so now i can enjoy this venti caramel frappuccino!"mindset
I'd like to be a smartass and say something like "well, calories are only really burned outdoors then."
I'm not going to ride 50 miles for the calories, that's unthinkable. I'm going to do it because it means I'm going to spend 3 hours exploring a beautiful place, without walls and a ceiling like in my car. I won't be in a rush like when I've driven through the area before, I'll be able to smell the pines. I'm looking forward to getting out of the city again.
But I'm also going to burn a lot of calories, and I'm going to replace them all with tacos.
Maybe another difference is you can't really know how many calories you've burned on an elliptical. I use a power meter to measure (torque vector and angular velocity) how much energy I put into the bike and will never be more than 5% off from the truth with this method.3 -
NorthCascades wrote: »heidishmidi wrote: »NorthCascades wrote: »Ironandwine69 wrote: »I can see that. People think " oh ,I worked out, I can eat more".
50 mile bike ride planned for tomorrow. Should I not eat more afterwards?
I think it's more the "i went on the elliptical for 30 minutes so now i can enjoy this venti caramel frappuccino!"mindset
I'd like to be a smartass and say something like "well, calories are only really burned outdoors then."
I'm not going to ride 50 miles for the calories, that's unthinkable. I'm going to do it because it means I'm going to spend 3 hours exploring a beautiful place, without walls and a ceiling like in my car. I won't be in a rush like when I've driven through the area before, I'll be able to smell the pines. I'm looking forward to getting out of the city again.
But I'm also going to burn a lot of calories, and I'm going to replace them all with tacos.
Maybe another difference is you can't really know how many calories you've burned on an elliptical. I use a power meter to measure (torque vector and angular velocity) how much energy I put into the bike and will never be more than 5% off from the truth with this method.
On the contrary, i know EXACTLY how many calories I've burned on the elliptical.
Zero. The answer is zero. Because I wouldn't bother with an elliptical if it came with a handheld massager and spit out $100 bills.
I hope it's clear that I was just explaining my take on the typical person's thought process behind justifying enormous treats because they 'burned the extra calories'.
You enjoy those tacos. You're gonna earn em.
5 -
Last Sunday at a family reunion several people asked me how I did it. My wife jumped in and said, "He ate a little less and moved a little more!"3
-
heidishmidi wrote: »On the contrary, i know EXACTLY how many calories I've burned on the elliptical.
Zero. The answer is zero. Because I wouldn't bother with an elliptical if it came with a handheld massager and spit out $100 bills.
My girlfriend got one a year ago. We tried to give it away. It's just a clothes hanger.5 -
A pound of fat = 3500 calories. You have to create a deficit of 3500 calories to lose a pound of fat. It's as simply as that. If you reduce your intake over a period of time by a total of 3500 calories or you use/burn more calories than you normally would to reduce the 3500 calories, it's still a matter of creating that deficit in order to lose that pound of fat. You can't burn the calories, then eat them back or vice versa and still expect loss weight. That's physically impossible.2
-
I often serve at the kiosk in the supermarket where I work and it saddens me how often I see ladies fresh out from their sessions in the gym buying their post-workout snacks consisting mainly of chocolate and full sugar energy drinks. They don't realise they are about to consume more calories just in that snack than they burned in the gym...
But hey, their fellas were already in earlier stocking up on beer and crisps for the night, bypassing the whole exercise thing completely!
But this is how things are shaping up in the UK now, a lot of folks are getting fatter and fatter whilst most of what they eat and drink is just making it worse.
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.7K Introduce Yourself
- 43.5K Getting Started
- 259.7K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.6K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 394 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.7K Motivation and Support
- 7.8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.3K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 944 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.3K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions