Fruit: is it necessary?

leanitup123
leanitup123 Posts: 489 Member
edited July 2017 in Food and Nutrition
"EAT 4 SERVINGS OF FRUIT PER DAY BECAUSE HEALTH!!!"
"FRUIT IS GOOD FOR YOU EAT MORE FRUIT!"
"I'M SO HEALTHY BECAUSE I EAST FRUIT!!!"

Okay, okay don't get me wrong... I get that it's "healthy" because of the fiber, vitamins and minerals - but it also has plenty of (natural) sugar. I eat plenty of vegetables but veer away from fruit.

What are your thoughts - is it really necessary to eat fruit every day? I could easily go a week, a month - heck even a year without eating it.
«13

Replies

  • Momepro
    Momepro Posts: 1,509 Member
    It has some vitamins that are good for you. And a bit of natural sugar is also good for you to an extent. But I suppose as long as you are getting all the sugar and vitamins you need from another source then you could ignore fruits.
  • Chef_Barbell
    Chef_Barbell Posts: 6,644 Member
    I have Oral Allergy Syndrome and cannot eat most fruits. So no it's not necessary for weight loss or life.
  • JustRobby1
    JustRobby1 Posts: 674 Member
    You can get the nutrients supplied by fruit elsewhere of course, so I would not call omitting it problematic. But since I happen to enjoy fruit myself, It would not be my preferred way to proceed.
  • leanitup123
    leanitup123 Posts: 489 Member
    I hate fruit with a passion. I eat huge amounts of vegetables. I cannot find one nutrient that I'm missing by not eating fruit.

    You and me both. Only fruit I ever eat and enjoy is raspberries or blueberries.
  • JeromeBarry1
    JeromeBarry1 Posts: 10,179 Member
    I hate fruit with a passion. I eat huge amounts of vegetables. I cannot find one nutrient that I'm missing by not eating fruit.

    You and me both. Only fruit I ever eat and enjoy is raspberries or blueberries.

    The raspberry and blueberry are extremely worthy additions to a person's food plan, and are frequently used as ingredients in many 'not fruit' products.
  • kristikitter
    kristikitter Posts: 602 Member
    I adore fruit nowadays (mostly the sweeter stuff like grapes, strawberries and pears) but no, I used to barely eat any of it and I was totally healthy!!

    I find pears to be useful as they fill me up, but that job could be done by a whole host of other foodstuffs.
  • jgnatca
    jgnatca Posts: 14,464 Member
    I eat my fruit last which drives my husband crazy. After all they are so good for you. I find if I get behind eating my citrus fruits I'm more vulnerable to sore throats.
  • fpmferreira
    fpmferreira Posts: 21 Member
    Ok, fruit contains sugar, and?
    Sugar is need in the proper amounts, and it widely changes depending on the type of fruit.
  • ccrdragon
    ccrdragon Posts: 3,374 Member
    ccrdragon wrote: »
    Ok, fruit contains sugar, and?
    Sugar is need in the proper amounts, and it widely changes depending on the type of fruit.

    Just to clarify something for you - your body does not 'need' sugar, any glucose that the body needs can be manufactured from fat so there are no dietary 'needs' for sugar.

    If you want to be really pedantic, you should say that your body doesn't need to ingest sugar. Because your body most certainly does need glucose so much so to the point that if none is ingested, it will make its own.

    On the subject of fruit, I don't agree with the demonization of the sugar in it and personally love it, but I don't think it offers anything nutritionally that you can't get from vegetables.

    If you don't want to eat it, don't eat it. I don't think this needs to be a polarizing discussion.

    Yes, I should have qualified that with the need to ingest sugar :smile:
  • T1DCarnivoreRunner
    T1DCarnivoreRunner Posts: 11,502 Member
    edited July 2017
    ccrdragon wrote: »
    Ok, fruit contains sugar, and?
    Sugar is need in the proper amounts, and it widely changes depending on the type of fruit.

    Just to clarify something for you - your body does not 'need' sugar, any glucose that the body needs can be manufactured from fat so there are no dietary 'needs' for sugar.

    Not exclusively from fat... glucose can be manufactured from protein - either dietary or body protein (muscle).

    We need about 120g-130g of glucose per day (it varies slightly from person to person) for our brain and central nervous system. Except if you are in ketosis, when that amount decreases at a rate of approximately 10% per mmol/l of blood ketones.

    Muscles can directly oxidize fat (dietary or body) for energy, so they do not need glucose. However, people who consume glucose (carbs) on a regular basis have muscles that are adapted to be most efficient at using carbs glucose and not fat. This is why it isn't wise to just suddenly stop eating without researching to know what you are doing. Same goes to those eliminating carbs suddenly without doing their research first so that they understand what to expect while muscles adapt to become more efficient at oxidizing fat.

    While humans do not need to consume carbs / glucose at all, one should understand certain things before eliminating all carbs. No worries, though... if you only cut fruit from your diet, you will still likely consume a lot of carbs from vegetables, grains, legumes, and certain types of dairy.

    *Edit shown above.
  • lemurcat12
    lemurcat12 Posts: 30,886 Member
    edited July 2017
    I don't think it's necessary. (I do think vegetables are basically necessary although of course you can manage to live even without eating them, and some rare people have problems digesting them.) I also find it annoying that they get grouped together in recommendations or that people read "10 servings of fruit and veg" as meaning 5 servings of fruit and 5 of veg," since I think veg are more important and really those kinds of recs should be fulfilled primarily with vegetables, with fruit as a nice extra. (This could be me being a crank, though.)

    I do think the idea that fruit is bad for you or must be limited, because sugar, is an outgrowth of the current demonization of sugar and carbs and should go away. That people think they need to avoid fruit for health is messed up, IMO, and shows that nutrition advice is being communicated poorly.

    Some people (although again I think this is rare) may find that they have a blood glucose reaction to some fruits that means they should be limited or not eaten alone. Others may find that they do better on a very low carb diet, so end up limiting fruit as a result, and I think that's fine, of course (although for me the pleasures of in-season, local fruit are not something I would give up, and I think they contribute to a healthy diet).

    And obviously some people may have allergies or digestive problems with some foods, some of which may be fruits, and those people should not eat those foods.
  • lemurcat12
    lemurcat12 Posts: 30,886 Member
    ccrdragon wrote: »
    Ok, fruit contains sugar, and?
    Sugar is need in the proper amounts, and it widely changes depending on the type of fruit.

    Just to clarify something for you - your body does not 'need' sugar, any glucose that the body needs can be manufactured from fat so there are no dietary 'needs' for sugar.

    If you want to be really pedantic, you should say that your body doesn't need to ingest sugar. Because your body most certainly does need glucose so much so to the point that if none is ingested, it will make its own.

    On the subject of fruit, I don't agree with the demonization of the sugar in it and personally love it, but I don't think it offers anything nutritionally that you can't get from vegetables.

    If you don't want to eat it, don't eat it. I don't think this needs to be a polarizing discussion.

    Yep, all this.
  • OliveGirl128
    OliveGirl128 Posts: 801 Member
    edited July 2017
    Yesterday I hit over 1,000 grams of produce and around half of that was fruit. I definitely put emphasis on veggies but the fruit breaks things up and adds a bit of variety to my diet.
  • CSARdiver
    CSARdiver Posts: 6,252 Member
    I hate fruit with a passion. I eat huge amounts of vegetables. I cannot find one nutrient that I'm missing by not eating fruit.

    You and me both. Only fruit I ever eat and enjoy is raspberries or blueberries.

    The raspberry and blueberry are extremely worthy additions to a person's food plan, and are frequently used as ingredients in many 'not fruit' products.

    Flavonoids - extremely beneficial. You don't necessarily have to get these from fruit e.g. if you have an allergy you can still get these via supplementation - teas, pills, etc.
  • estherdragonbat
    estherdragonbat Posts: 5,283 Member
    I find that a lot of low-calorie desserts use fruit to replace higher-calorie options. I made a peach-nut pudding cake this week. 8 servings. 99 calories/serving. Because it's got 1/4 cup of white flour, 1/4 cup whole wheat, 1/3 cup of sugar and 1.5 cups of peaches. Everything else? Baking powder, extracts, 2 tbsp chopped nuts. The fruit provides much of the bulk that would normally come from the flour and sugar. The fruit sugars mean less added sugar. The cake is delicious; I've made it before. It's one of those low-cal options that doesn't taste 'diet'. And the peaches are the main reason why.

    Maybe I don't 'need' fruit in my diet. But the cake sure does.
  • lemurcat12
    lemurcat12 Posts: 30,886 Member
    That sounds worth trying out. (Also, peaches are amazing.)
  • GottaBurnEmAll
    GottaBurnEmAll Posts: 7,722 Member
    When I could still have gluten, I loved pudding cakes. Peach anything was my favorite. That sounds like an incredibly tasty treat.
  • estherdragonbat
    estherdragonbat Posts: 5,283 Member
    It is. I'm not up on the ratios for substituting gluten-free flours, but I can PM the recipe if you like.
  • OliveGirl128
    OliveGirl128 Posts: 801 Member
    cwolfman13 wrote: »
    "EAT 4 SERVINGS OF FRUIT PER DAY BECAUSE HEALTH!!!"
    "FRUIT IS GOOD FOR YOU EAT MORE FRUIT!"
    "I'M SO HEALTHY BECAUSE I EAST FRUIT!!!"

    Okay, okay don't get me wrong... I get that it's "healthy" because of the fiber, vitamins and minerals - but it also has plenty of (natural) sugar. I eat plenty of vegetables but veer away from fruit.

    What are your thoughts - is it really necessary to eat fruit every day? I could easily go a week, a month - heck even a year without eating it.

    I tend towards a serving or two of fruit...mostly berries and right now cherries are in season so I'm eating a lot of those. I put an emphasis on veg, but fruit is very good for you and is chalk full of antioxidants. I get a little weary over all of the sugar fear mongering...when people are avoiding fruit because they're afraid of sugar, you know things have gone too far...ridiculous.

    I mostly use fruit to make my green smoothies bearable, (bananas and berries), but the one fruit I actually look forward to coming into season every year and love by themselves is cherries! They're definitely skewing my fruit intake numbers right now :#
  • AnnPT77
    AnnPT77 Posts: 34,173 Member
    Fruit necessary daily? No.

    Delicious and desirable? Yes, for me.

    Today I ate about 11 servings of vegetables total, and about 2 of fruit (assuming you count tomatoes and cucumbers as veggies as per normal culinary/dietary practice, rather than as fruit as per botany . . . .).

    Is the fruit sugar "bad"? Since I'm not even remotely close to diabetic . . . no.

    And I suspect my no-sugar-added dairy foods today had more sugars than my fruits, anyway. Not sure, though - I don't bother to track sugar.



  • GottaBurnEmAll
    GottaBurnEmAll Posts: 7,722 Member
    It is. I'm not up on the ratios for substituting gluten-free flours, but I can PM the recipe if you like.

    I'd have to look up a specific gluten free pudding cake, and it would likely have eggs. I think gluten makes pudding cakes, well, pudding-y. Thanks for offering, though!
  • Old_Cat_Lady
    Old_Cat_Lady Posts: 1,193 Member
    Cost prohibits fresh fruit in my area (for me). I take a multi along with a vit C w/ flavonoids from Costco.
    Why does the government subsidize corn and wheat but not fruit?
    I simply will not pay $1.50 for an apple. Not worth it.