We are pleased to announce that as of March 4, 2025, an updated Rich Text Editor has been introduced in the MyFitnessPal Community. To learn more about the changes, please click here. We look forward to sharing this new feature with you!
Should I keep my activity level as sedentary on mfp?

Jaegur
Posts: 80 Member
I've always listed my activity level as sedentary and use that caloric intake number as my goal. I drive a truck 4 days a week so I'm sitting about 10 hours a day.
However, I also work out 4 days a week for roughly 2 hours at a time, strength and cardio, and sometimes play racquetball on the weekend for an hour or two.
I'm mainly worried about eating at too much of a defecit and shooting myself in the foot.
However, I also work out 4 days a week for roughly 2 hours at a time, strength and cardio, and sometimes play racquetball on the weekend for an hour or two.
I'm mainly worried about eating at too much of a defecit and shooting myself in the foot.
1
Replies
-
Log your exercise and eat half the calories back0
-
On MFP you are expected to set your activity level without including exercise, so sedentary is correct. If you log your exercise correctly then the calorie goal the app gives you will prevent you from eating too little.2
-
I'm mainly worried about eating at too much of a defecit and shooting myself in the foot.
After a period of weeks you will know the rate of loss you are actually getting - then make adjustments if needed.
First couple of weeks weight loss can be exaggerated by losing water weight so take that into account.2 -
This content has been removed.
-
JerSchmare wrote: »
Agree.
Randomly halving an estimate is a mathematical abomination!
Inaccuracy in food logging is far more significant anyway but people aren't advised to double their food calorie estimates....2 -
JerSchmare wrote: »
That depends on what your exercise is and which estimates you're using.
MFP, Mapmyrun/Strava, and quite a few others estimate over by as much as 120% in some cases. 50% is generally reasonable.0 -
This content has been removed.
-
Thanks, all! I've lost over a hundred pounds already, but lately I've just started worrying about my body holding on because I may be cutting more than 30 percent of my calories with my activity level and what not. But, I shall leave it as is and keep monitoring.1
-
I have mine as secondary because with me it varies week to week. Some weeks depending on how I'm feeling and how busy I am I will work out 3 to 4 days a week then other weeks I won't work out at all so I figured putting secondary is my best bet.0
-
JerSchmare wrote: »stanmann571 wrote: »JerSchmare wrote: »
That depends on what your exercise is and which estimates you're using.
MFP, Mapmyrun/Strava, and quite a few others estimate over by as much as 120% in some cases. 50% is generally reasonable.
No. It doesn't matter at all. And it's just really bad advice for people that are new.
The proper advice is eat as much food as possible and hit your goals. Random nonsense such as "eat half your exercise calories" is bad advice. It doesn't depend on anything.
In the end, you have to track results. So, over time, you will find where you lose, gain, and maintain. But, telling people random advice that has no bearing on anything and is completely made up and false is, bad advice.
The goal again, is to EAT AS MUCH FOID AS YOU CAN WHILE REACHING YOUR STATED GOAL.
Using bad estimates like 1300 calories for a 4 mile run WILL NOT HELP YOU REACH YOUR STATED GOAL0 -
JerSchmare wrote: »
Agree.
Randomly halving an estimate is a mathematical abomination!
Inaccuracy in food logging is far more significant anyway but people aren't advised to double their food calorie estimates....
I actually found that accounting for half the calories that MFP gives me for exercise was fairly accurate when I calculated my TDEE after the second month of tracking.0 -
JerSchmare wrote: »
Agree.
Randomly halving an estimate is a mathematical abomination!
Inaccuracy in food logging is far more significant anyway but people aren't advised to double their food calorie estimates....
Most people overestimate their exercise calories and underestimate their food calories. So Yes, that would be a great suggestion. Although, it's a much easier error to correct since food can be weighed.
Which compounds the error. Since 1200 estimated CI is actually 1500 and 2200 estimated CO is actually 1600. Which leads to threads about "Why am I gaining weight on 1200 calories.... I'm working out for 2 hours 5 days a week burning 1100 calories a session"
0 -
Eating back all your exercise calories doesn't mean blindly following MFP or any other source.
Telling people to halve estimates when what exercise they do isn't even known is ridiculous.
0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.6K Introduce Yourself
- 44K Getting Started
- 260.5K Health and Weight Loss
- 176.1K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 393 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153.1K Motivation and Support
- 7.8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 4K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 1.2K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.3K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions