Revealing Abs
dpr73
Posts: 495 Member
So I have done a few tiny bulk and cuts over the years l. I normally am at 138lbs and will bulk to just over 146 with a slight surplus (2500-2700) for around 5 months and then will naturally come back down to 138 over a few months after decreasing the deficit down to a reasonable number of calories (about 2200-2300).
I am largely pleased with where my body is, but I am sick of not having abs. I work them out weekly with weights and various exercises but they don't seem to come. People have told me that they don't work nearly as hard as I on lifting and nutrition yet they have abs and I can't get them to show.
A little background: I was once on the pudgy side (205 at 5'7) when I was younger. After getting to college I lost the weight to around 138 and maintained for four years since, with the only exception being these planned mini bulks. As a result, I do have loose skin. It is nothing crazy but I can pull my skin very far and if I pull the skin down I can see all of my abs. Most people find it so freaky haha.
So long story short, I expect I am around 10% BF cause there really isn't much fat on me and I am quite vascular in my arms. I also do not have fat in the abdominal region. I believe the culprit to my invisible abs is my slightly looser skin which keeps the abs from showing. For this reason,my initial guess is that I need to grow my abs to get them, but whenever I search everyone says revealing abs is all about low body fat; however, is my situation sort of an exception? Due to my slightly lose skin, will a well planned bulk period with a small surplus reveal abs for me as the bulk will grow my abs enough to push against my body wall? Or will a serious bulk then cut be required for me as well?
I have trouble justifying a huge bulk and cut because I like my physique but do not see my abs whatsoever so I don't want to ruin what I currently have only to find that my abs simply won't show. But on the other hand, I am sick of being dissatisfied with working really hard with nutrition and the gym but not getting the final coveted result of abs.
So any opinions? I am currently 5'7 138 at 22 eating approximately 2400-2500 to try to build a bit more on my frame. My lifting schedule is five days a week: Chest/Tri, Back/Bi, Abs, Legs, Shoulders. I emphasize compound lifts like deadlifts, bench press, squats, dumbbell rows. However, I just moved so my squatting has changed from barbell squats (both back and front) to front dumbbell squats because my complimentary gym has no squat rack. I lift for about 45 mins and have a 5 minute cardio warmup. I have current pics attached--both flexing, just after eating, no gym pump.
I am largely pleased with where my body is, but I am sick of not having abs. I work them out weekly with weights and various exercises but they don't seem to come. People have told me that they don't work nearly as hard as I on lifting and nutrition yet they have abs and I can't get them to show.
A little background: I was once on the pudgy side (205 at 5'7) when I was younger. After getting to college I lost the weight to around 138 and maintained for four years since, with the only exception being these planned mini bulks. As a result, I do have loose skin. It is nothing crazy but I can pull my skin very far and if I pull the skin down I can see all of my abs. Most people find it so freaky haha.
So long story short, I expect I am around 10% BF cause there really isn't much fat on me and I am quite vascular in my arms. I also do not have fat in the abdominal region. I believe the culprit to my invisible abs is my slightly looser skin which keeps the abs from showing. For this reason,my initial guess is that I need to grow my abs to get them, but whenever I search everyone says revealing abs is all about low body fat; however, is my situation sort of an exception? Due to my slightly lose skin, will a well planned bulk period with a small surplus reveal abs for me as the bulk will grow my abs enough to push against my body wall? Or will a serious bulk then cut be required for me as well?
I have trouble justifying a huge bulk and cut because I like my physique but do not see my abs whatsoever so I don't want to ruin what I currently have only to find that my abs simply won't show. But on the other hand, I am sick of being dissatisfied with working really hard with nutrition and the gym but not getting the final coveted result of abs.
So any opinions? I am currently 5'7 138 at 22 eating approximately 2400-2500 to try to build a bit more on my frame. My lifting schedule is five days a week: Chest/Tri, Back/Bi, Abs, Legs, Shoulders. I emphasize compound lifts like deadlifts, bench press, squats, dumbbell rows. However, I just moved so my squatting has changed from barbell squats (both back and front) to front dumbbell squats because my complimentary gym has no squat rack. I lift for about 45 mins and have a 5 minute cardio warmup. I have current pics attached--both flexing, just after eating, no gym pump.
2
Replies
-
This content has been removed.
-
It could be your genetics. In my case, cutting or bulking, my legs always carry leg fat with little to no muscle definition, but my upper body is the total opposite, the leaner I get, the more muscle definition I have. In your case, it seems your genetics make it tough for your abs to pop out. After a few several bulk and cuts, they will pop up one day just like in my case with my legs. I know that Mike Matthews for example, it took him 7-8 years just to have some muscle definition on his legs....so I suspect the same will happen to me.
I agree, but I also think that 138 is still relatively small for a 5'7 male. So it's possible that more mass is going to be needed to get that ab definition. I think 150 to 155 would be a good long term goal to get to.2 -
Thanks for the response! I agree that I probably have different genetics. How should I go about getting up to 150-155 in the long term? Like what kind of cycle should I do and how much of a surplus over time? Should I bulk up to like 145 and then cut 5 and then back up to 150 cut 5 etc?It could be your genetics. In my case, cutting or bulking, my legs always carry leg fat with little to no muscle definition, but my upper body is the total opposite, the leaner I get, the more muscle definition I have. In your case, it seems your genetics make it tough for your abs to pop out. After a few several bulk and cuts, they will pop up one day just like in my case with my legs. I know that Mike Matthews for example, it took him 7-8 years just to have some muscle definition on his legs....so I suspect the same will happen to me.
I agree, but I also think that 138 is still relatively small for a 5'7 male. So it's possible that more mass is going to be needed to get that ab definition. I think 150 to 155 would be a good long term goal to get to.
0 -
This content has been removed.
-
I am not an expert, but I have a little obsession with body fat % right now and compared to those "comparative tables" with pictures you can find online everywhere I would say you are not at 10 %. I would put you at 14-15%.2
-
skymningen wrote: »I am not an expert, but I have a little obsession with body fat % right now and compared to those "comparative tables" with pictures you can find online everywhere I would say you are not at 10 %. I would put you at 14-15%.
I understand based on pictures that I may not be the ideal 10, but when I feel my stomach there is literally no fat. What may appear to be fat is actually grabbable skin. Like I said, i can pull this down (a very thin layer) and reveal my abs. But when I let go they don't show. I have never met another person who is able to pull skin like that.
I also had bulked to around 145 once and when I was around there, I would say I was about 14/15, those pics match that normal 15% pics that are thrown around on the internet. So the skin is what I think is the culprit overall. I just need to get a handle on how to ameliorate it.
1 -
Thanks for the response! I agree that I probably have different genetics. How should I go about getting up to 150-155 in the long term? Like what kind of cycle should I do and how much of a surplus over time? Should I bulk up to like 145 and then cut 5 and then back up to 150 cut 5 etc?It could be your genetics. In my case, cutting or bulking, my legs always carry leg fat with little to no muscle definition, but my upper body is the total opposite, the leaner I get, the more muscle definition I have. In your case, it seems your genetics make it tough for your abs to pop out. After a few several bulk and cuts, they will pop up one day just like in my case with my legs. I know that Mike Matthews for example, it took him 7-8 years just to have some muscle definition on his legs....so I suspect the same will happen to me.
I agree, but I also think that 138 is still relatively small for a 5'7 male. So it's possible that more mass is going to be needed to get that ab definition. I think 150 to 155 would be a good long term goal to get to.
How long have you been training, this usually determines how much weight you should gain per month until you hit that weight.
I have been lifting consistently for four years. I lost all the weight the first year, continued lifting, "bulked" to around 147 and then went back down to 137, maintained again, then bulked up to around 145 again, weight came back down again, and now I am here. This whole time I've been lifting though.1 -
Gloriam_Sanguinis wrote: »It could be your genetics. In my case, cutting or bulking, my legs always carry leg fat with little to no muscle definition, but my upper body is the total opposite, the leaner I get, the more muscle definition I have. In your case, it seems your genetics make it tough for your abs to pop out. After a few several bulk and cuts, they will pop up one day just like in my case with my legs. I know that Mike Matthews for example, it took him 7-8 years just to have some muscle definition on his legs....so I suspect the same will happen to me.
I agree, but I also think that 138 is still relatively small for a 5'7 male. So it's possible that more mass is going to be needed to get that ab definition. I think 150 to 155 would be a good long term goal to get to.
This.. I think you need more muscles to get definition. At 5'7 you're almost the same weight I am at 5'2 and a female.
I'm new to the PT scene but I'd recommend that you'd add a little weight to your lifts and eat a little more. You don't have to do a full on dirty bulk to gain, you can do a clean one and let it happen over a long time period but I believe that a long time bulk might help you in gaining and revealing abs.
I am trying to hit a daily target to 2500 and getmy weight up. But justneed to figure out the best bulk/cut cycle from here to maintain my physique overall but while also adding the muscle slowly. Like I said, I like the current physique but want to reveal the abs, so something slow and sensible is fine with me.
2 -
I just think you aren't lean enough. I'm not seeing any veins, which is what I'm basing my assumption on.2
-
I just think the picture doesn't do it justice cause that's definitely something I have. I can see them al up and down my arms and on my chest especially when lifting. A physician had actually recently commented on my vascularity the other day hahaI just think you aren't lean enough. I'm not seeing any veins, which is what I'm basing my assumption on.
1 -
Thanks for the response! I agree that I probably have different genetics. How should I go about getting up to 150-155 in the long term? Like what kind of cycle should I do and how much of a surplus over time? Should I bulk up to like 145 and then cut 5 and then back up to 150 cut 5 etc?It could be your genetics. In my case, cutting or bulking, my legs always carry leg fat with little to no muscle definition, but my upper body is the total opposite, the leaner I get, the more muscle definition I have. In your case, it seems your genetics make it tough for your abs to pop out. After a few several bulk and cuts, they will pop up one day just like in my case with my legs. I know that Mike Matthews for example, it took him 7-8 years just to have some muscle definition on his legs....so I suspect the same will happen to me.
I agree, but I also think that 138 is still relatively small for a 5'7 male. So it's possible that more mass is going to be needed to get that ab definition. I think 150 to 155 would be a good long term goal to get to.
How long have you been training, this usually determines how much weight you should gain per month until you hit that weight.
I have been lifting consistently for four years. I lost all the weight the first year, continued lifting, "bulked" to around 147 and then went back down to 137, maintained again, then bulked up to around 145 again, weight came back down again, and now I am here. This whole time I've been lifting though.
Have you been following a structured program or a self designed program? Can you provide some details on your training routine.
IRT how long to bulk? Well, you are pretty lean (and the exact % doesn't matter too much; although, I'd think 10% isn't very unrealistic currently) but, I'd bulk to gain 10 to 20 lbs. It largely depends on how your body responds. But I'd have a smaller surplus since you have already bulk (~10% over TDEE).1 -
I just think you aren't lean enough. I'm not seeing any veins, which is what I'm basing my assumption on.
Vascularity is a very poor indicator of leanness. And yes, it does pop more as you get leaner, but genetics does play a role. Hell, this guy is more lean than I am, but I have a ton of more vascularity even when I was over 20%.2 -
Thanks for the response! I agree that I probably have different genetics. How should I go about getting up to 150-155 in the long term? Like what kind of cycle should I do and how much of a surplus over time? Should I bulk up to like 145 and then cut 5 and then back up to 150 cut 5 etc?It could be your genetics. In my case, cutting or bulking, my legs always carry leg fat with little to no muscle definition, but my upper body is the total opposite, the leaner I get, the more muscle definition I have. In your case, it seems your genetics make it tough for your abs to pop out. After a few several bulk and cuts, they will pop up one day just like in my case with my legs. I know that Mike Matthews for example, it took him 7-8 years just to have some muscle definition on his legs....so I suspect the same will happen to me.
I agree, but I also think that 138 is still relatively small for a 5'7 male. So it's possible that more mass is going to be needed to get that ab definition. I think 150 to 155 would be a good long term goal to get to.
How long have you been training, this usually determines how much weight you should gain per month until you hit that weight.
I have been lifting consistently for four years. I lost all the weight the first year, continued lifting, "bulked" to around 147 and then went back down to 137, maintained again, then bulked up to around 145 again, weight came back down again, and now I am here. This whole time I've been lifting though.
Have you been following a structured program or a self designed program? Can you provide some details on your training routine.
IRT how long to bulk? Well, you are pretty lean (and the exact % doesn't matter too much; although, I'd think 10% isn't very unrealistic currently) but, I'd bulk to gain 10 to 20 lbs. It largely depends on how your body responds. But I'd have a smaller surplus since you have already bulk (~10% over TDEE).
Jim Stoppani's Shortcut to Size or the past 9 months or so. But I am welcome to try a new lifting program if you have sugfestions. One reason I haven't done something like 5x5 training is cause I also use weight lifting as a stress release and so going to the gym for a short period of time and not getting a bigger release has been less appealing to me. But then again, I may be misunderstanding the structure of that program.
I agree that maybe 250 addition or so would be fine with me to bulk on. I plan on gaining to 145-150 and then cutting to 140 but really assessing as I go using consistent weekly progress photos. The progress photos have been an area of my previous bulk phases that I haven't kept with so well.0 -
Thanks for the response! I agree that I probably have different genetics. How should I go about getting up to 150-155 in the long term? Like what kind of cycle should I do and how much of a surplus over time? Should I bulk up to like 145 and then cut 5 and then back up to 150 cut 5 etc?It could be your genetics. In my case, cutting or bulking, my legs always carry leg fat with little to no muscle definition, but my upper body is the total opposite, the leaner I get, the more muscle definition I have. In your case, it seems your genetics make it tough for your abs to pop out. After a few several bulk and cuts, they will pop up one day just like in my case with my legs. I know that Mike Matthews for example, it took him 7-8 years just to have some muscle definition on his legs....so I suspect the same will happen to me.
I agree, but I also think that 138 is still relatively small for a 5'7 male. So it's possible that more mass is going to be needed to get that ab definition. I think 150 to 155 would be a good long term goal to get to.
How long have you been training, this usually determines how much weight you should gain per month until you hit that weight.
I have been lifting consistently for four years. I lost all the weight the first year, continued lifting, "bulked" to around 147 and then went back down to 137, maintained again, then bulked up to around 145 again, weight came back down again, and now I am here. This whole time I've been lifting though.
Have you been following a structured program or a self designed program? Can you provide some details on your training routine.
IRT how long to bulk? Well, you are pretty lean (and the exact % doesn't matter too much; although, I'd think 10% isn't very unrealistic currently) but, I'd bulk to gain 10 to 20 lbs. It largely depends on how your body responds. But I'd have a smaller surplus since you have already bulk (~10% over TDEE).
Jim Stoppani's Shortcut to Size or the past 9 months or so. But I am welcome to try a new lifting program if you have sugfestions. One reason I haven't done something like 5x5 training is cause I also use weight lifting as a stress release and so going to the gym for a short period of time and not getting a bigger release has been less appealing to me. But then again, I may be misunderstanding the structure of that program.
I agree that maybe 250 addition or so would be fine with me to bulk on. I plan on gaining to 145-150 and then cutting to 140 but really assessing as I go using consistent weekly progress photos. The progress photos have been an area of my previous bulk phases that I haven't kept with so well.
I'd definitely think you would benefit from a better designed program. Looking at the program, it's fairly low frequency and kind of a typical brosplit; at least based on that below PDF i found about it. It seems the major compound moves, you are doing once a week, which while it will work, isn't very efficient. Considering protein synthesis occurs over a 36 to 48 hour period, training major muscle groups 2 to 3 a week is ideal.
https://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/docs/2011/shortcut-to-size-e-book.pdf
Depending if you want a four or five day program, I'd recommend looking into either PHUL or PHAT. Both has a good amount of volume and can be done in about an hour or a little after. But there are also other programs you can look at (link below) to find one that suits your personal needs.
http://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/10332083/which-lifting-program-is-the-best-for-you/p1
Additionally, I wouldn't really put a constraint on your weight. If you hit 150 and are still relatively lean, you can bulk a bit more. So make your weight goals a moving target and reassess every 5 to 10 lbs.1 -
This content has been removed.
-
Thanks for the response! I agree that I probably have different genetics. How should I go about getting up to 150-155 in the long term? Like what kind of cycle should I do and how much of a surplus over time? Should I bulk up to like 145 and then cut 5 and then back up to 150 cut 5 etc?It could be your genetics. In my case, cutting or bulking, my legs always carry leg fat with little to no muscle definition, but my upper body is the total opposite, the leaner I get, the more muscle definition I have. In your case, it seems your genetics make it tough for your abs to pop out. After a few several bulk and cuts, they will pop up one day just like in my case with my legs. I know that Mike Matthews for example, it took him 7-8 years just to have some muscle definition on his legs....so I suspect the same will happen to me.
I agree, but I also think that 138 is still relatively small for a 5'7 male. So it's possible that more mass is going to be needed to get that ab definition. I think 150 to 155 would be a good long term goal to get to.
How long have you been training, this usually determines how much weight you should gain per month until you hit that weight.
I have been lifting consistently for four years. I lost all the weight the first year, continued lifting, "bulked" to around 147 and then went back down to 137, maintained again, then bulked up to around 145 again, weight came back down again, and now I am here. This whole time I've been lifting though.
I agree with everyone else, your weight is too low, I am 5'9 and around 10% bf at 156 lbs and like you, I've been lifting for 4 years....normally your end of cut range should be somewhere in the 140-150 lbs range, I would recommend you to bulk up and aim to gain about 2 lbs per month, you may even try to hit 3-4 lbs per month since you seem to have been always very very lean and haven't really bulked properly. For each year that passes in your "lifting career" , the less amount of muscles you can build (unless you are on steroids or have some amazing genetics).
I think that's my most major hangup that keeps my spinning my wheels. I keep thinking I've missed the chance to build abs and muscle because I've been going for four years now and don't want to risk finding out that's the case and then get stuck losing what I currently have. Weirdthought process I know but I think it's the major issue for me0 -
This content has been removed.
-
You would be surprised on how the body works. I thought that I wouldn't be able to have an athletic body if I started weight lifting at 30 years old, but I am wrong so far. I am in my mid 30's and I was still able to acheive an athletic body.... in fact, I feel much better and stronger now than I ever been in my younger years. Unless you wait to eat and train properly at 50-60 years old (you can still make some nice gains at that age though, but isn't as optimal than when you start lifting at a young age), it's definitively not too late for you to come close of hitting your maximum muscle potential.
Thanks for the response! I agree that I probably have different genetics. How should I go about getting up to 150-155 in the long term? Like what kind of cycle should I do and how much of a surplus over time? Should I bulk up to like 145 and then cut 5 and then back up to 150 cut 5 etc?It could be your genetics. In my case, cutting or bulking, my legs always carry leg fat with little to no muscle definition, but my upper body is the total opposite, the leaner I get, the more muscle definition I have. In your case, it seems your genetics make it tough for your abs to pop out. After a few several bulk and cuts, they will pop up one day just like in my case with my legs. I know that Mike Matthews for example, it took him 7-8 years just to have some muscle definition on his legs....so I suspect the same will happen to me.
I agree, but I also think that 138 is still relatively small for a 5'7 male. So it's possible that more mass is going to be needed to get that ab definition. I think 150 to 155 would be a good long term goal to get to.
How long have you been training, this usually determines how much weight you should gain per month until you hit that weight.
I have been lifting consistently for four years. I lost all the weight the first year, continued lifting, "bulked" to around 147 and then went back down to 137, maintained again, then bulked up to around 145 again, weight came back down again, and now I am here. This whole time I've been lifting though.
I agree with everyone else, your weight is too low, I am 5'9 and around 10% bf at 156 lbs and like you, I've been lifting for 4 years....normally your end of cut range should be somewhere in the 140-150 lbs range, I would recommend you to bulk up and aim to gain about 2 lbs per month, you may even try to hit 3-4 lbs per month since you seem to have been always very very lean and haven't really bulked properly. For each year that passes in your "lifting career" , the less amount of muscles you can build (unless you are on steroids or have some amazing genetics).
I think that's my most major hangup that keeps my spinning my wheels. I keep thinking I've missed the chance to build abs and muscle because I've been going for four years now and don't want to risk finding out that's the case and then get stuck losing what I currently have. Weirdthought process I know but I think it's the major issue for me
Well even people in their 50s and 60s can do well. We have a couple that have made awesome muscle gains.1 -
This content has been removed.
-
If you bulk then cut back to the same the weight every year are you actually making any progress?
If your abs aren't showing then reduce body fat more and/or train your abs1 -
trigden1991 wrote: »If you bulk then cut back to the same the weight every year are you actually making any progress?
If your abs aren't showing then reduce body fat more and/or train your abs
I guess I figured if I cut back down I would accomplish a quicker "recomp" by dropping body fat slowly, but I would have expected to reveal abs after my second time of doing this process and it hasn't happened. So I think maybe a full on bulk cut cycle may need to happen.
Two questions:
+ do you guys typically terminate a bulk when pants are getting too tight?
+Also, on weekends my gf (who is otherwise super supportive of my efforts) likes to go out for dinner or something. How should I account for these dinners, given that I chronically seem to overestimate my intake? I usually set aside 1000 calories and try to limit myself so I don't go over, but frankly I don't know if this is the right thing to do on a bulk. This is not like an everyday thing either...usually once a week/twice MAX if I happen to have family around over the weekend.0 -
You want to add mass...you need to eat, run the chit out of a proven program, get proper rest. Miss any of these, and you'll spin your wheels.
I would bulk up to at least 175lb before I even considered a cut at your height with your goals.
Stop worrying about abs, at least for now and put some mass on.2 -
You want to add mass...you need to eat, run the chit out of a proven program, get proper rest. Miss any of these, and you'll spin your wheels.
I would bulk up to at least 175lb before I even considered a cut at your height with your goals.
Stop worrying about abs, at least for now and put some mass on.
I don't really want to "add mass" I just want to fill out a bit more and add some abs to my frame. I don't want to get huge, but a bit more muscle and some abs would be nice. Also, do you have incite ito my two questions (above)?
0 -
You want to add mass...you need to eat, run the chit out of a proven program, get proper rest. Miss any of these, and you'll spin your wheels.
I would bulk up to at least 175lb before I even considered a cut at your height with your goals.
Stop worrying about abs, at least for now and put some mass on.
I don't really want to "add mass" I just want to fill out a bit more and add some abs to my frame. I don't want to get huge, but a bit more muscle and some abs would be nice. Also, do you have incite ito my two questions (above)?
To achieve these goals by definition, you need to add mass. They don't come out if thin air.
You wouldn't be considered huge by any standards bulking to at least 175lbs before cutting.
1. My bulk ends when my fat percentage is too high for optimal results for muscle synthesis or I need to make weight for a meet. My my visual estimations, I would be around 18% bf. Clothes has nothing to do with my goals.Two questions:
+ do you guys typically terminate a bulk when pants are getting too tight?
+Also, on weekends my gf (who is otherwise super supportive of my efforts) likes to go out for dinner or something. How should I account for these dinners, given that I chronically seem to overestimate my intake? I usually set aside 1000 calories and try to limit myself so I don't go over, but frankly I don't know if this is the right thing to do on a bulk. This is not like an everyday thing either...usually once a week/twice MAX if I happen to have family around over the weekend.
2. You worrying about going over isn't going to help. Like I mentioned you need to add mass, you're underweight for the goals you desire.
One doesn't get huge by mistake. It takes very hard work and a long time. I wouldn't worry about accidentally getting too big.
0 -
You want to add mass...you need to eat, run the chit out of a proven program, get proper rest. Miss any of these, and you'll spin your wheels.
I would bulk up to at least 175lb before I even considered a cut at your height with your goals.
Stop worrying about abs, at least for now and put some mass on.
I don't really want to "add mass" I just want to fill out a bit more and add some abs to my frame. I don't want to get huge, but a bit more muscle and some abs would be nice. Also, do you have incite ito my two questions (above)?
To achieve these goals by definition, you need to add mass. They don't come out if thin air.
You wouldn't be considered huge by any standards bulking to at least 175lbs before cutting.
1. My bulk ends when my fat percentage is too high for optimal results for muscle synthesis or I need to make weight for a meet. My my visual estimations, I would be around 18% bf. Clothes has nothing to do with my goals.Two questions:
+ do you guys typically terminate a bulk when pants are getting too tight?
+Also, on weekends my gf (who is otherwise super supportive of my efforts) likes to go out for dinner or something. How should I account for these dinners, given that I chronically seem to overestimate my intake? I usually set aside 1000 calories and try to limit myself so I don't go over, but frankly I don't know if this is the right thing to do on a bulk. This is not like an everyday thing either...usually once a week/twice MAX if I happen to have family around over the weekend.
2. You worrying about going over isn't going to help. Like I mentioned you need to add mass, you're underweight for the goals you desire.
One doesn't get huge by mistake. It takes very hard work and a long time. I wouldn't worry about accidentally getting too big.
Thanks. I know one doesn't get huge by mistake but I don't want to end up fat. I was there before and don't even want to come close to that level of unhealthiness again. A FFB complex, essentially (and yes I have read all the articles about FFB's and spinning my wheels etc...)0 -
This content has been removed.
-
skymningen wrote: »I am not an expert, but I have a little obsession with body fat % right now and compared to those "comparative tables" with pictures you can find online everywhere I would say you are not at 10 %. I would put you at 14-15%.
OP: I'm late to this thread but, if you work your abs weekly as claimed and still cannot "see" your abs, you still have too much fat over them.
The problem is NOT loose skin, it's too much fat. Typically, for men, you can just begin to see ab muscles at 15% but they don't become readily apparent until you reach 10%.
This would suggest that, despite being on the low end of the weight range for your height, that you are actually still over 15% BF and that recomp instead of bulking would be better for you because bulking will just increase your BF which will continue to hide your abs.
You may just be more genetically resistant to losing belly fat than other men but the problem would remain fat and not loose skin. I too was able to better "see" my abs by pulling my belly skin tight when I was around 16% BF but they did not become apparent on their own until I dropped my BF to near 10% and below.
FYI: I am 66, 5'8" and am now at 158 with 8.7% BF based on hydrostatic testing and reached this level by losing 4# and recomping 8# of LBM & BF over the last 8 months, when I began my recomp effort starting at 162 & 16% BF. I have a visible 6 pack, as well as enhanced muscular definition and vacularity. You can see pics of my upper body near the end of my "Ready to Recomp" thread in the Maintenance sun forum.
This is why I think that recomp may be a better way for you to reach your goal of visible abs than would bulking up.
Good luck!
1 -
skymningen wrote: »I am not an expert, but I have a little obsession with body fat % right now and compared to those "comparative tables" with pictures you can find online everywhere I would say you are not at 10 %. I would put you at 14-15%.
OP: I'm late to this thread but, if you work your abs weekly as claimed and still cannot "see" your abs, you still have too much fat over them.
The problem is NOT loose skin, it's too much fat. Typically, for men, you can just begin to see ab muscles at 15% but they don't become readily apparent until you reach 10%.
This would suggest that, despite being on the low end of the weight range for your height, that you are actually still over 15% BF and that recomp instead of bulking would be better for you because bulking will just increase your BF which will continue to hide your abs.
You may just be more genetically resistant to losing belly fat than other men but the problem would remain fat and not loose skin. I too was able to better "see" my abs by pulling my belly skin tight when I was around 16% BF but they did not become apparent on their own until I dropped my BF to near 10% and below.
FYI: I am 66, 5'8" and am now at 158 with 8.7% BF based on hydrostatic testing and reached this level by losing 4# and recomping 8# of LBM & BF over the last 8 months, when I began my recomp effort starting at 162 & 16% BF. I have a visible 6 pack, as well as enhanced muscular definition and vacularity. You can see pics of my upper body near the end of my "Ready to Recomp" thread in the Maintenance sun forum.
This is why I think that recomp may be a better way for you to reach your goal of visible abs than would bulking up.
Good luck!
How many calories does one typically do to recomp? I have been keeping at maintenance for 4 years pretty much now but have not revealed them yet. This is why I am considering the surplus.
Also with a waist size at 27-28 I am not sure where the fat is hiding if I am somehow above 15% BF, I honestly don't think I have fat to take off of me (I also have very skinny legs, not pictured). My opinion is that my abs are underdeveloped so they don't pop through the skin, which may require a bulk/cut type deal, but I feel I am currently in a holding pattern where my abs cannot get any bigger and push up into the abdominal wall more until I put weight on to grow them. But I am obviously no expert at this.0 -
skymningen wrote: »I am not an expert, but I have a little obsession with body fat % right now and compared to those "comparative tables" with pictures you can find online everywhere I would say you are not at 10 %. I would put you at 14-15%.
OP: I'm late to this thread but, if you work your abs weekly as claimed and still cannot "see" your abs, you still have too much fat over them.
The problem is NOT loose skin, it's too much fat. Typically, for men, you can just begin to see ab muscles at 15% but they don't become readily apparent until you reach 10%.
This would suggest that, despite being on the low end of the weight range for your height, that you are actually still over 15% BF and that recomp instead of bulking would be better for you because bulking will just increase your BF which will continue to hide your abs.
You may just be more genetically resistant to losing belly fat than other men but the problem would remain fat and not loose skin. I too was able to better "see" my abs by pulling my belly skin tight when I was around 16% BF but they did not become apparent on their own until I dropped my BF to near 10% and below.
FYI: I am 66, 5'8" and am now at 158 with 8.7% BF based on hydrostatic testing and reached this level by losing 4# and recomping 8# of LBM & BF over the last 8 months, when I began my recomp effort starting at 162 & 16% BF. I have a visible 6 pack, as well as enhanced muscular definition and vacularity. You can see pics of my upper body near the end of my "Ready to Recomp" thread in the Maintenance sun forum.
This is why I think that recomp may be a better way for you to reach your goal of visible abs than would bulking up.
Good luck!
Generally true, but the more likely case is that you just need to build some muscle, or possibly that your abs don't/won't manifest as a 6/8 pack(some people have that problem)0 -
How many calories does one typically do to recomp? I have been keeping at maintenance for 4 years pretty much now but have not revealed them yet. This is why I am considering the surplus.
Recomp is generally done at or just below your TDEE. This will vary for everyone. The TDEE I used to start my recomp effort was 1800 but this increased over time to 2100, where it stands now.
I have no idea why I my TDEE increased while still maintaining my weight at/or about 158, which is my current weight +/-3#. I "think" it's due to the increased muscle mass and the thermogenic nature of my high protein and high carb (but mainly low GI) diet but have no proof of that. It's simply a fact based on the data that I've recorded.Also with a waist size at 27-28 I am not sure where the fat is hiding if I am somehow above 15% BF, I honestly don't think I have fat to take off of me (I also have very skinny legs, not pictured). My opinion is that my abs are underdeveloped so they don't pop through the skin, which may require a bulk/cut type deal, but I feel I am currently in a holding pattern where my abs cannot get any bigger and push up into the abdominal wall more until I put weight on to grow them. But I am obviously no expert at this.
If you have been working on your abs doing isolation or compound exercises or weight lifting weekly, as you said you have been doing, there's no reason to believe that your abs are not sufficiently developed already to show if your BF level is low enough and the fat layer above them is thin enough to reveal them.
In fact, you've already said they are visible when you tighten your belly skin over them. If that's the case, I just have to repeat that the problem is the fat layer above your abs, not loose skin. You may just be skinny fat.
At 5'7 & 138, your BMI is 21.6 which is at the low end of the normal range. You would not be considered underweight until you dropped below 119 w/a BMI below 18.6. By comparison, at 5'8" & 158, my BMI is 24.0, which is at the extreme high end of the normal range and only 1 point away from being considered overweight.
The difference between us is certainly due to my higher than normal LBM to BF ratio (91/9) and the fact that BMI is admittedly not a good measure of health for body builders or senior citizens (I qualify as both) because of the difference in their LBM/BF ratios from the mathematical model upon which BMI calculations are based; bodybuilders have lower BF than expected and seniors higher BF than expected.
Given your relatively low BMI and weight for your size, you certainly could do well to bulk up BUT you said that you want to be able to see your abs -- presumably sooner rather than later.
If this is so, then recomp at your current weight would be the way to go. This will result in decreasing your BF level while at the same time increasing your LBM, while maintaining the same weight. So, just assuming that you are at 15% BF now, your LBM is 117# and your BF is 21#. If you can recomp 8# of LBM/BF over the next 6-8 months (which is a reasonable goal because I was able to do it and I have no special expertise in this area either), your BF% would rise to 125# or 90% and your BF would drop to 13# or less than 10% and your abs should be clearly visible then, unless you actually had more than 15% BF to begin with.
If bulking up is more important to you, then do that instead. You just have to realize that if you go on a surplus diet to bulk up, you will also be gaining fat (as well as LBM and muscle if you exercise properly) and that your abs will continue to be hidden while you are doing this and will not become visible later until you cut and drop your BF sufficiently to reveal them.
However, before you do anything else, I strongly suggest that you get a DXA scan and/or hydrostatic test done in order to establish a precise baseline measurement for your LBM and BF level. You may be surprised with the results.
If you can only find a BodPod, use it but be aware that it is the less accurate than DXA or hydro and tends to under report the amount of fat, which would just be more confusing for you. DXA tends to run higher in terms of BF than hydro but it also provides more detailed info like the amount of BF in VAT (visceral adipose tissue) which sits in the organs right behind your belly and is a good indication of how much fat you hold in that area.
FYI, my VAT dropped from 41.5 cu in/1.41# at 20% BF down to 12.2 cu in/0.42# at 13% as measured by DXA over the past year, which indicates my very low level of abdominal fat. However, my hydro results (which do not measure VAT) over the same period dropped from 16.9% to 8.7% BF, which was consistently 3-5% less than the overall BF level measured by DXA. That's why I do them both.
If you cannot find or afford such tests, you can try calipers but you need to find someone to take your BF measurements who is experienced and qualified to use them. Not everyone is qualified to use them accurately and it's really not possible to do that yourself. Don't even bother with bio-electrical devices.
Calling around to gyms and/or trainers in your area should point you towards someone qualified to do a caliper measurement on you BUT the $ you pay that person may be the same or even more than just paying for a DXA scan or hydrostatic test.
Good luck!0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 427 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions