Runners: Favorite smartwatch
Replies
-
NorthCascades wrote: »Garmin Fenix 5X. I'd tell you why I love it but I'm sure there's a limit to post length.
I have a Garmin 920XT (triathlon model at the time).. I bought it before they came out with the Fenix line (it merged many of the features of the running/triathlon line and the outdoor line that previously were unavailable on the same watch). When it eventually dies, I'll probably buy a Fenix.0 -
look up "dc rainmaker" for running watch reviews, and figure out which features you really want.0
-
Some possible features to think about when deciding:
[1] Battery life. Are you planning to go on any backpacking/mountaineering trips? Marathons or ultra runs? etc.
[2] Are you planning to do any specific speedwork workouts (like a tempo run, or introduce sprints, or any other interval-type workouts) that you would like programmed into the watch?
[3] Pre-planned courses with cues? (watch will beep and show a cue telling you when and which direction to turn).
[4] Visible map of your path
[5] Basemap (topo or street maps laid under your path)
[6] support for other less common activities
[7] effort required to sync data
[8] Compatibility with training sites
[9] Customized fields/number of fields viewable during activity0 -
NorthCascades wrote: »fitoverfortymom wrote: »NorthCascades wrote: »Watches that track exercise record great detail, and send it to other software. That usually happens over Bluetooth, because it's more convenient than having to plug your watch into your computer to see your data. Once you have a watch exchanging data with a phone, you might as well go whole hog and throw in stuff like text messages, you've already built the infrastructure for it, and they add a lot of value for very little additional cost.
I wouldn't mind having that stuff, its just not necessary. I did like that my watch would vibrate with phone calls.
I'm not really a phone person and didn't expect to get much use out of those features. I kind of thought they were a gimmick. Turns out they mean I can set my phone down and forget about it, still getting my texts, and seeing that they don't need an immediate response. I also like the "find my phone" feature.
Find my phone might be my favourite feature. It's usually under a cat.7 -
NorthCascades wrote: »Garmin Fenix 5X. I'd tell you why I love it but I'm sure there's a limit to post length.
I have a Garmin 920XT (triathlon model at the time).. I bought it before they came out with the Fenix line (it merged many of the features of the running/triathlon line and the outdoor line that previously were unavailable on the same watch). When it eventually dies, I'll probably buy a Fenix.
I have a co-worker with a 920XT. It's like a square Fenix with an extra physical button. He loves it.0 -
VintageFeline wrote: »scorpio516 wrote: »Garmins:
Forerunner 230. A separate HR strap is better than a wrist based optical. But it also sounds like you aren't going to train by hr anyway, so why buy a feature you don't want.
Forerunner 35. Simplier and cheaper than the FR230.
Vivoactive 3. Preorder, but 95% of the FR23x but with extra stuff. 23x will only do bike, run, or other. VA3 will do stuff like kayaking.
Wouldn't you go Forerunner 235 over 230?
No. Litterally the only difference is the leds. As they aren't as accurate as every other way of reading a HR, the 230 is the better way to go0 -
I went to my local running shop, Ultra Running Company in Charlotte, and after they patiently walked me through lots of options, I went with the Garmin Fenix 5x. I've never looked back. I've had every one; Fitbit, Apple, Suunto, and none of them has been as good as this watch. Ridiculous battery life too! Can't recommend it highly enough.0
-
fitoverfortymom wrote: »melissaulmen wrote: »Does it have to be a smartwatch? Are you wanting something that tells you about test messages, etc...
My most minimum requirements are the ability to track my exercise (primarily walking and running, occasional biking and hiking). The ability to text, call, social media is completely unimportant. Being able to connect it to MFP automatically for calories purposes is a necessity also.
Might be more than you "need" and you may not like the square style, but the Garmin920xt does all the things you've outlined (and more) at a price point of about $200 online, $250 with optional chest strap HRM. It is aimed at the multisport audience, so it is waterproof and provides swim data as well. All my garmin data is synced to MFP automatically.
This is very appealing.0 -
Some possible features to think about when deciding:
[1] Battery life. Are you planning to go on any backpacking/mountaineering trips? Marathons or ultra runs? etc.
[2] Are you planning to do any specific speedwork workouts (like a tempo run, or introduce sprints, or any other interval-type workouts) that you would like programmed into the watch?
[3] Pre-planned courses with cues? (watch will beep and show a cue telling you when and which direction to turn).
[4] Visible map of your path
[5] Basemap (topo or street maps laid under your path)
[6] support for other less common activities
[7] effort required to sync data
[8] Compatibility with training sites
[9] Customized fields/number of fields viewable during activity
Also if you want/need a waterproof option.
I picked Garmin over a Fitbit because my Fitbit died after getting caught in a rainstorm.0 -
fitoverfortymom wrote: »fitoverfortymom wrote: »melissaulmen wrote: »Does it have to be a smartwatch? Are you wanting something that tells you about test messages, etc...
My most minimum requirements are the ability to track my exercise (primarily walking and running, occasional biking and hiking). The ability to text, call, social media is completely unimportant. Being able to connect it to MFP automatically for calories purposes is a necessity also.
Might be more than you "need" and you may not like the square style, but the Garmin920xt does all the things you've outlined (and more) at a price point of about $200 online, $250 with optional chest strap HRM. It is aimed at the multisport audience, so it is waterproof and provides swim data as well. All my garmin data is synced to MFP automatically.
This is very appealing.
The Garmin 920xt is the "go to" device for many folks in my triathlon club. I know at least ten people who own the 920. No complaints about performance that I'm aware of among our group. It is a rock solid device. I love mine!0 -
I think the quality of Garmin can't be beat. I have only taken mine off to charge since last January, still works as it did on day one. Even the screen is still perfect.0
-
Garmin Fenix 5S. I originally had a Fenix 3 but then had to take a year off from sports after surgery, so my husband took it and then bought me the 5S after my recovery. The slightly smaller size of the 5S is way more appropriate for my wrist. It's waterproof so I can wear it when I swim laps (I'm terrible at keeping track of my yardage otherwise) and has a very easy triathlon mode too. Tons of analytics. Easy to sync with my iPhone/Strava/mfp.
0 -
NorthCascades wrote: »fitoverfortymom wrote: »NorthCascades wrote: »Watches that track exercise record great detail, and send it to other software. That usually happens over Bluetooth, because it's more convenient than having to plug your watch into your computer to see your data. Once you have a watch exchanging data with a phone, you might as well go whole hog and throw in stuff like text messages, you've already built the infrastructure for it, and they add a lot of value for very little additional cost.
I wouldn't mind having that stuff, its just not necessary. I did like that my watch would vibrate with phone calls.
I'm not really a phone person and didn't expect to get much use out of those features. I kind of thought they were a gimmick. Turns out they mean I can set my phone down and forget about it, still getting my texts, and seeing that they don't need an immediate response. I also like the "find my phone" feature.
I generally leave my phone on full silent/vibrate. the watch means I don't miss important calls if the phone isn't on my belt or in my hand.
OH, and Garmin. I've got the VA1, and it's been amazing.
Unlike the Apple and Samsung smart watch entries, it doesn't try to be a phone and a computer as well as a watch, It's just a watch with Bluetooth and a few extra features.1 -
I've used an Apple Watch for the last two years. Love the smart watch features, not as enthused with the workout features (and that's more a fault of the shortcomings in their workout tracking app than anything else). I bought a Garmin 935 which will be arriving today. Obviously I can't speak to its features yet, but I'm looking forward to using it.0
-
It's not out yet, but the Fitbit Ionic looks pretty cool to hit around the $300 price point. Looks like Fitbit finally made it waterproof for swimming, and they made the GPS built-in. I also personally like that it will have the ability to store music0
-
This content has been removed.
-
stanmann571 wrote: »NorthCascades wrote: »fitoverfortymom wrote: »NorthCascades wrote: »Watches that track exercise record great detail, and send it to other software. That usually happens over Bluetooth, because it's more convenient than having to plug your watch into your computer to see your data. Once you have a watch exchanging data with a phone, you might as well go whole hog and throw in stuff like text messages, you've already built the infrastructure for it, and they add a lot of value for very little additional cost.
I wouldn't mind having that stuff, its just not necessary. I did like that my watch would vibrate with phone calls.
I'm not really a phone person and didn't expect to get much use out of those features. I kind of thought they were a gimmick. Turns out they mean I can set my phone down and forget about it, still getting my texts, and seeing that they don't need an immediate response. I also like the "find my phone" feature.
I generally leave my phone on full silent/vibrate. the watch means I don't miss important calls if the phone isn't on my belt or in my hand.
OH, and Garmin. I've got the VA1, and it's been amazing.
Unlike the Apple and Samsung smart watch entries, it doesn't try to be a phone and a computer as well as a watch, It's just a watch with Bluetooth and a few extra features.
I agree they got the balance just right. Each "smart" feature they add makes the device more complicated to use, and hurts battery life. They put enough in to be useful, without taking away from the fitness and sport focus.0 -
I love my Garmin fenix 5s. It's pricey but worth every penny--I bought it when I replaced my fourth Fitbit that went bust.
I wear it every day (it's an attractive watch) and it tracks all sorts of activities. I'm a long distance runner and I crosstrain with indoor cycling.1 -
0 -
NorthCascades wrote: »
That looks like Colorado.1 -
Most Garmin watches can do navigation, even if they don't have maps. You have to plan your route ahead of time on a PC or a phone; having maps in the watch means the watch itself can choose your route.
I know we're talking about running watches, the same features are useful for cycling too.
This updates with your progress as you ride (or run) but I hadn't started yet:
You don't need maps to do this, the file you navigate from can have these points in it:
The watch vibrates before the turn and shows you where to go, then again at the turn. Right afterwards, it tells you how long until the next turn and the name of the street you'll be looking out for.
Honestly, parking somewhere unfamiliar and letting the watch choose the route feels pretty adventurous. Not much idea what's coming up next, you can not know where you are, but know you'll be led back to where you started, it's great.
Finally, here's a pic from the ride above. You can have it avoid unpaved roads, I like it better this way.
0 -
fitoverfortymom wrote: »NorthCascades wrote: »
That looks like Colorado.
I've always thought this part of Washington (Harts Pass) looks a lot like Colorado, too. 0 -
VintageFeline wrote: »I think the quality of Garmin can't be beat. I have only taken mine off to charge since last January, still works as it did on day one. Even the screen is still perfect.
Same for me and my Apple Watch. 2 years old and still as good as the day I bought it.
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.3K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 424 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions