Adjusting calories to account for higher than average muscle mass?

pbbananacoffeechocolate
pbbananacoffeechocolate Posts: 44 Member
edited November 21 in Health and Weight Loss
Question that I've been pondering for awhile: If mfp's calorie goals are based on an average body composition, then does it make sense for more muscular people to increase calories? I've heard that muscle mass burns more calories at rest than fat. Would it make sense for me to tweak the system by bumping up activity level one notch, but still tracking workouts and eating back those calories, if hungry?

Replies

  • jemhh
    jemhh Posts: 14,261 Member
    I would base this on my real life results. If you're losing faster than expected on your goal, that's an indication that you do need to eat more (or if weight loss isn't your goal, if you're losing when you expect to maintain or not gaining when you expect to gain).

    If things were going as I expected, I wouldn't eat more.

    This. Exactly this.

    Also, muscle burns about six calories per pound per day. Fat burns two. If you have ten pounds more muscle than average, which would be significant for a woman, that's just 60 calories more per day.

    But yes, it's better to adjust based on results.
This discussion has been closed.