Question

b3wzbp7jagbm.png

Replies

  • aeloine
    aeloine Posts: 2,163 Member
    Hi, this is the third place you've posted this. Please don't spam the boards.

    I responded on one of your other posts about this.
  • cmriverside
    cmriverside Posts: 34,409 Member
    Polar HRMs are meant to be used for steady-state cardio so it may be less than accurate for daily activity. That's not what it's designed to do, but you are probably burning in the mid to high 2000s regardless, on days you work.

    Yes, you should.

    How are you calculating your food eaten?
  • NorthCascades
    NorthCascades Posts: 10,968 Member
    No that's not realistic.
  • jcstevens86
    jcstevens86 Posts: 3,338 Member
    aeloine wrote: »
    Hi, this is the third place you've posted this. Please don't spam the boards.

    I responded on one of your other posts about this.

    Are you and admin for mfp
  • erickirb
    erickirb Posts: 12,294 Member
    HRMs are not designed to give an accurate calorie burn for non-steady state cardio. So no, that is not accurate at all.

    Plus HRMs already count the calories you would have burned during that period at rest (BMR) not additional calories due to a workout. So, even if it were accurate, you would have to back out maintenance calories from the readout.
  • NorthCascades
    NorthCascades Posts: 10,968 Member
    HRMs don't count calories. They count heart beats.