Health Safety Concerns Being Well Addressed in Clinical Drug Trials?

stevencloser

People never could keep it in their pants. Heck, Shakespeare even Made a Play Out of two Teenagers who couldn't keep it in their pants even under fear of death.
And even If people did, If 90% have it and it's largely asymptomatic, chances are even If you "save yourself until marriage" one of you likely has it anyway.
How the hell is this even an Argument then? Get that damn vaccination.

stanmann571

stevencloser wrote: »

People never could keep it in their pants. Heck, Shakespeare even Made a Play Out of two Teenagers who couldn't keep it in their pants even under fear of death.
And even If people did, If 90% have it and it's largely asymptomatic, chances are even If you "save yourself until marriage" one of you likely has it anyway.
How the hell is this even an Argument then? Get that damn vaccination.

if 90% have it, then clearly the causal link between HPV and cervical cancer is tenuous at best.

If it's as easily transmitted as one earlier poster claimed, then vaccinating is likely a waste of time(if 90% have it)

I'm all for vaccinating when there's a clear risk reward benefit.

There's simply not a clear a>b>c risk/benefit for this particular vaccine.

4legsRbetterthan2

Dear Posters,

Due to the original content of this thread naturally leading into many divisive topics (guideline 15) this debate will remain closed.

Sincerely,
4legs
MFP moderator