Calorie Counter

You are currently viewing the message boards in:

Hiking

offbeatblondeoffbeatblonde Posts: 10Member Member Posts: 10Member Member
Hello! Ive been doing a neighborhood hiking trail with inclines multiple times a day.

My questions are,

1. How can I more accurately log my calories burned for the day than selecting the "hiking < 10 lbs", since it doesn't take inclines and random bursts of running into consideration

And

2. Do any of you hikers add any other training into your schedule? If so, what? I have a pudge and want it GONE.

TIA

Replies

  • jjpptt2jjpptt2 Posts: 4,884Member Member Posts: 4,884Member Member
    RE #1: I think you're overthinking it. Accuracy is an illusion for pretty much all of this. Make a reasonable estimate (for which hiking <10lbs is probably reasonable) and go on with your business.

    RE #2: Are you trying to add things to help with your hiking, or to help with your pudge? If the first, more hiking is the best option, but most anything will benefit you in some way and translate to your hiking. If the second, that's mostly about diet/intake, so make sure you are eating properly.
  • keithwp99keithwp99 Posts: 83Member Member Posts: 83Member Member
    Do you have a smart phone? You can get a free app called Runkeeper that will log in your mileage and put a swag on your calories.

    Hiking is my cross training 1X or so per week. My fitness of choice is trail running supported by strength/core work. Hiking is a way for me to recon and test fly trails for running. And, keep loose, too.
  • rsclausersclause Posts: 3,125Member Member Posts: 3,125Member Member
    +1 on the app. When paired with the right smartphone it can take into account elevation change, speed and distance. I don't know how accurate it is but if you focus on using it to push a bit farther or faster it's a win win!
  • yirarayirara Posts: 4,429Member Member Posts: 4,429Member Member
    use 0.3 * weight in lbs * distance in miles. That's the best equation there is for net calories. Yes, you walk uphill, but you also walk down again which should equal out things.
  • ronocnikralronocnikral Posts: 176Member Member Posts: 176Member Member
    yirara wrote: »
    use 0.3 * weight in lbs * distance in miles. That's the best equation there is for net calories. Yes, you walk uphill, but you also walk down again which should equal out things.

    It doesn't really work that way. It takes some extra energy on the downhill as well. Especially when it is steep, you are putting energy into basically stopping/slowing down your body each step.

    to calculate "vertical calories" = weight (lbs)*vert(ft)/3088. It's usually pretty small.

  • NorthCascadesNorthCascades Posts: 9,601Member Member Posts: 9,601Member Member
    yirara wrote: »
    use 0.3 * weight in lbs * distance in miles. That's the best equation there is for net calories. Yes, you walk uphill, but you also walk down again which should equal out things.

    I don't think that's right (for hiking specifically). That formula predicts that I burned about 6,400 calories hiking from Cascade Pass to Stehekin. It took me three days. I mean there days of wake up, make breakfast, pack the camp into my backpack, walk until the sun is getting ready to set, make camp, have dinner, stargaze, then repeat it all the next day. I thin k the ground surface and hills require significantly more energy than walking on a level sidewalk.
  • guacamole17guacamole17 Posts: 109Member Member Posts: 109Member Member
    fitness watch for the win! I love to see how my steps, heart rate, mileage, and much elevation gain and decent I get with each hike. And a cute little map. I just did a 13.8 miler with 2500 feet of elevation gain on Saturday and for the first time felt fantastic after such a thing.

    Hiking is another aspect of the training I do for Spartan and other obstacle course races. Generally the terrain in these races is an obstacle in and of itself, so for me, its a key component of my training is to be able to march right up those hills and still be able to finish the race/obstacles. I do a variety of training: grip, strength, endurance, running, and other hill work in addition to the hiking. Most recently I've added mobility, recovery, and flexibility to my list.

    But if I were just hiking, Id definitely focus on hill work in general (sprints, long slow elevation walks/runs, and lunges/step ups/other accessory work to work on those leg muscles). If you are carrying heavy packs, straight up time under your pack will be a huge benefit.
  • DevilsFan1DevilsFan1 Posts: 299Member Member Posts: 299Member Member
    Hike for fun and to keep your body healthy. Ignore calorie burn; it's going to be inaccurate. Get your diet in check to lose fat.
  • CoachJen71CoachJen71 Posts: 1,201Member Member Posts: 1,201Member Member
    I walked/hiked/dieted away 150lbs. If you only have a small amount of body fat to get rid of, keep walking and hiking, stay on top of your caloric intake, and do strength/resistance training to help with recomposition and hiking skills.
  • lorrpblorrpb Posts: 11,074Member Member Posts: 11,074Member Member
    yirara wrote: »
    use 0.3 * weight in lbs * distance in miles. That's the best equation there is for net calories. Yes, you walk uphill, but you also walk down again which should equal out things.

    I don't think that's right (for hiking specifically). That formula predicts that I burned about 6,400 calories hiking from Cascade Pass to Stehekin. It took me three days. I mean there days of wake up, make breakfast, pack the camp into my backpack, walk until the sun is getting ready to set, make camp, have dinner, stargaze, then repeat it all the next day. I thin k the ground surface and hills require significantly more energy than walking on a level sidewalk.

    You are right, but OP was hiking in her neighborhood, not through the Cascades.
  • Need2Exerc1seNeed2Exerc1se Posts: 13,589Member Member Posts: 13,589Member Member
    I think steps are great for improving (or maintaining through the cold muddy winter months) hiking, especially if you hike steep hills. I gave away my treadmill and bought a cheap step (like used for step aerobics) and use that for cardio when it's too muddy to hike. It keeps my lungs and legs in good hiking shape.

    I imagine this might be met with derision in this crowd but I also picked up a thigh master (yep, one of those things Suzanne Somers used to hawk on TV) and think it also helps.
  • sgt1372sgt1372 Posts: 3,452Member Member Posts: 3,452Member Member
    I use the following online calculator to estimate cals burned on a hike.

    It takes into account your weight, pack weight, time, distance, type of terrain and slope. It is more accurate than my pedometer (that assumes flat ground and estimates distance based on steps) and also less generous than MapMyHike (which is more accurate than the pedometer in terms of distance because it uses GPS but gives ridiculously high cal burn estimates).

    See: https://caloriesburnedhq.com/calories-burned-hiking/
  • scorpio516scorpio516 Posts: 941Member Member Posts: 941Member Member
    yirara wrote: »
    use 0.3 * weight in lbs * distance in miles. That's the best equation there is for net calories. Yes, you walk uphill, but you also walk down again which should equal out things.

    I don't think that's right (for hiking specifically). That formula predicts that I burned about 6,400 calories hiking from Cascade Pass to Stehekin. It took me three days. I mean there days of wake up, make breakfast, pack the camp into my backpack, walk until the sun is getting ready to set, make camp, have dinner, stargaze, then repeat it all the next day. I thin k the ground surface and hills require significantly more energy than walking on a level sidewalk.

    Strava says I do about .90 KCal per lb per mile hiking. Garmin says a whole lot less. 1500 KCal for Mt Moosilauke or 2200 KCal for Lafayette Ridge in the White Mountains seem about right
  • JMcGee2018JMcGee2018 Posts: 273Member Member Posts: 273Member Member
    Where I walk has tons of hills and I sometimes do intervals of walking. I use Map My Walk and consider any extra calories burned from inclines that might not be calculated by the app as a bonus. I only eat back 50% of my exercise calories anyways.
  • lorrpblorrpb Posts: 11,074Member Member Posts: 11,074Member Member
    You can keep track of your running intervals, subtract the time from your hiking, and log them as running.
    How much elevation do you gain on your inclines?
  • stanmann571stanmann571 Posts: 5,736Member Member Posts: 5,736Member Member
    scorpio516 wrote: »
    yirara wrote: »
    use 0.3 * weight in lbs * distance in miles. That's the best equation there is for net calories. Yes, you walk uphill, but you also walk down again which should equal out things.

    I don't think that's right (for hiking specifically). That formula predicts that I burned about 6,400 calories hiking from Cascade Pass to Stehekin. It took me three days. I mean there days of wake up, make breakfast, pack the camp into my backpack, walk until the sun is getting ready to set, make camp, have dinner, stargaze, then repeat it all the next day. I thin k the ground surface and hills require significantly more energy than walking on a level sidewalk.

    Strava says I do about .90 KCal per lb per mile hiking. Garmin says a whole lot less. 1500 KCal for Mt Moosilauke or 2200 KCal for Lafayette Ridge in the White Mountains seem about right

    I trust Garmin over Strava or Runkeeper or Mapmywalk/run
  • lorrpblorrpb Posts: 11,074Member Member Posts: 11,074Member Member
    Maybe give him a gift certificate to a store with a good selection. Fit is very personal.
Sign In or Register to comment.