Cardio For Fat Loss
Options
Replies
-
Tacklewasher wrote: »I know not all agree, but I like doing cardio (running) partly so I can eat more. It's still the biggest burn of calories for the time spent, and as long as I'm good about not over-eating them, those calories are my treat foods.
Andrei doesn't really dive into it much in the article above other than to mention diet, but there are a lot of people who believe their calorie burns during cardio are a lot higher than they actually are. How many threads have we seen claiming something like an 1100 calorie burn from a 60 minute cardio class, or that they're burning 2000 calories a day in exercise? Yeah, not unless you just happened to do an Ironman length triathlon today. Hence, the frequently seen MFP advice to eat back a portion of your exercise calories rather than all of them, and adjust as necessary.
So true. I used to have a BodyMedia Fit (still mad at Jawbone for screwing that up) and could see that I burned a whopping 2 calories going up a flight of stairs at work. Some of the women I worked with were sure that they burned "25-50" calories because going up stairs was hard. So they'd take the stairs a few times, figured they'd burned enough to have some cookies, and then wonder why they were gaining weight when they did all that stair climbing. They must have slow metabolisms!3 -
sandy_taylor13 wrote: »Your food intake is totally key.
This is so true. I did a full Ironman some years back and lost, over the 6-8 months I trained for it, about 9lbs. That was with training 2x/day, with 3 workouts on Saturdays, up to 20 hours total per week. The problem was that I was burning so many calories that I was hungry all the time and definitely NOT eating properly. It was volume over quality. So, I did the Ironman at 184lbs.
I'm now 170lbs after 5 months of watching what I eat, logging everything, focusing on drastically lowering my carbs and eating plenty of healthy oils and protein. It's crazy how this has "clicked" now that I've focused first on what I eat. I've been walking maybe 30 mins 3-4x/week; that's it for exercise. I'm kind of living proof that it's mostly about the food (though I will start cycling and running again once it warms up here...).
So, yeah, agree with what many have said on this post.
1 -
This post resonated with me. 15 years ago, I was losing weight & got into a bad cycle of creating my deficit almost solely through cardio. And it worked...for awhile. But as I lost weight and my caloric needs dropped, I still kept eating & drinking the same. I had to increase my cardio more and more to keep a deficit in place. I was spending multiple hours per day on a treadmill I hated, feeling increasingly desperate and miserable.
Eventually I got an overuse injury to my knee and had to stop the cardio. Since I had learned nothing about controlling my caloric intake, my weight loss stopped and soon the weight came back on. And I felt like a failure.
Now I focus on controlling calories in...and on body-weight based strength training with moderate amounts of cardio that I enjoy (walking, kayaking). My weight is finally in control and I love my fitness routine, instead of resenting it. Much happier way to live. :-)6 -
If I'm eating "heathier" foods and cooking at home, AND I have an active job, and I'm working out as I like, historically I could pretty much maintain my weight within 5 pounds of my goal. Getting a desk job completely threw that out the window. Even then, however, if I wanted to lose those few pounds I'd have to tighten up my eating a bit.
Finding that balance between eating enough to fuel your workouts and still lose some fat is the balancing act I'm trying to go through right now (basically, a recomp). It's slow, and progress is measured in weeks not days, but it's coming along and I'm reaching my goals.1 -
Since this is a question which comes up semi-regularly, I thought it was worth sharing a good Facebook post from Szotak Andrei (a coach/trainer) about the subject:SHOULD YOU DO CARDIO TO HELP YOU LOSE FAT?
Here are a couple considerations to take into account when deciding if you should do cardio or not when trying to lose fat.
First and foremost, you have to realize that your diet is going to be your number 1 weapon to aid fat loss, and it should be the first on the list of priorities to take care of.
Second, even though cardio is not necessary for fat loss, it’s still very important for overall health and as such, it should be incorporated in some shape or form in everyone’s training program, regardless of goals.
Third, if you are going to use cardio to help you lose fat, make sure to pick a type (low, medium, high intensity) and modality (treadmill, bike, stepper, stairmaster etc) that you actually enjoy and you’re going to stick to, instead of opting for one that you think it’s “optimal”, even though you don’t see yourself doing it as often as you should.
Fourth and final consideration is to make sure the cardio you do doesn’t tire you out so much that you unconsciously start moving less the rest of the day. It’s no use to do 200 kcal worth of cardio if you’re just going to lay in bed the rest of the day and burn 300 kcal less.
Tracking your steps is a good way to ensure your overall activity is still up once you start introducing some structured cardio into your workouts.
To me exercise and high intensity cardio makes losing weight sustainable. It makes a huge difference with what you can eat if you eat pretty healthy. I can't stand eating just 1600 calories a day without exercise. I like to eat more often. With a hour and a half of exercise i can eat another small meal or a little snack not using all the calories and still lose 2 lbs a week. I've been able to keep this up since October. Bodies are made to move and studies dont say more exercise and cardio is bad for your health. I think more people could eat more of the things they want and not feel deprived with an active job and\or cardio.1 -
sandy_taylor13 wrote: »Your food intake is totally key. While training for a marathon we had a lot of people who were very heavy and remained heavy throughout the training (and we were all running over 30 miles a week). Problem was that many would just head on over to IHOP after our runs, totally negating all the calories they just burned. And when we finished the race, many wondered why they had gained weight. CICO
But what if they went to IHOP and ate half their plate and tracked their calories. It makes losing weight more sustainable to be active. They would have been less likely to be able to go out at all or only had a very small portion if they had done nothing.2 -
WillingtoLose1001984 wrote: »To me exercise and high intensity cardio makes losing weight sustainable. It makes a huge difference with what you can eat if you eat pretty healthy. I can't stand eating just 1600 calories a day without exercise. I like to eat more often with a hour and a half of exercise i can eat another small meal or a little snack not using all the calories and still lose 2 lbs a week. I've been able to keep this up since October. Bodies are made to move and studies dont say more exercise and cardio is bad for your health. I think more people could eat more of the things they want and not feel deprived with an active job and\or cardio.
The conversation evolved in that direction as the thread progressed. Yes, there's nothing wrong with using exercise to create "room" for some extra food, as long as one is being realistic about how many calories they're burning in their workouts. I think the point of Andrei's article was to address the people who start exercising while still eating 3,500 calories per day and can't understand why they're not losing weight. Too many people hold the mistaken idea that as long as you exercise, you'll lose weight no matter how bad your diet is.
You even see threads from people saying "I'm eating healthy and exercising, but not losing weight". It doesn't matter how "healthy" you eat if your calories aren't in check. Which is why Andrei says that the first order of business is to get your diet straight. It goes back to the saying "You can't out-train a bad diet" or "You can't outrun your fork". No matter what, it still comes down to CI<CO.2 -
WillingtoLose1001984 wrote: »sandy_taylor13 wrote: »Your food intake is totally key. While training for a marathon we had a lot of people who were very heavy and remained heavy throughout the training (and we were all running over 30 miles a week). Problem was that many would just head on over to IHOP after our runs, totally negating all the calories they just burned. And when we finished the race, many wondered why they had gained weight. CICO
But what if they went to IHOP and ate half their plate and tracked their calories. It makes losing weight more sustainable to be active. They wouldnt have been able to go out at all or only had a very small portion of they had done nothing.
On the flip side, sometimes injuries sideline people and their intake will need to be reduced. For some, it is hard to make that switch. Ask me, I know.5 -
Tacklewasher wrote: »I know not all agree, but I like doing cardio (running) partly so I can eat more. It's still the biggest burn of calories for the time spent, and as long as I'm good about not over-eating them, those calories are my treat foods.
Nothing wrong with that, especially since you take the bolded into consideration.
The problem comes when people do a 1-mile run or a 30-minute Zumba class or whatever and think they "earned" a reward, so they go eat a 600-calorie ice cream sundae or some such. Heck, you could do a 5-mile run and wipe that extra deficit out (plus some!) in less than 5 minutes by stopping off at McDonalds for a Big Mac and fries on the way home.
Andrei doesn't really dive into it much in the article above other than to mention diet, but there are a lot of people who believe their calorie burns during cardio are a lot higher than they actually are. How many threads have we seen claiming something like an 1100 calorie burn from a 60 minute cardio class, or that they're burning 2000 calories a day in exercise? Yeah, not unless you just happened to do an Ironman length triathlon today. Hence, the frequently seen MFP advice to eat back a portion of your exercise calories rather than all of them, and adjust as necessary.
But you can burn 1000 calories in 90 minutes doing a hard workout. That makes a huge difference to what you can eat even if you just eat half.2 -
Tiny_Dancer_in_Pink wrote: »WillingtoLose1001984 wrote: »sandy_taylor13 wrote: »Your food intake is totally key. While training for a marathon we had a lot of people who were very heavy and remained heavy throughout the training (and we were all running over 30 miles a week). Problem was that many would just head on over to IHOP after our runs, totally negating all the calories they just burned. And when we finished the race, many wondered why they had gained weight. CICO
But what if they went to IHOP and ate half their plate and tracked their calories. It makes losing weight more sustainable to be active. They wouldnt have been able to go out at all or only had a very small portion of they had done nothing.
On the flip side, sometimes injuries sideline people and their intake will need to be reduced. For some, it is hard to make that switch. Ask me, I know.0 -
WillingtoLose1001984 wrote: »Tacklewasher wrote: »I know not all agree, but I like doing cardio (running) partly so I can eat more. It's still the biggest burn of calories for the time spent, and as long as I'm good about not over-eating them, those calories are my treat foods.
Nothing wrong with that, especially since you take the bolded into consideration.
The problem comes when people do a 1-mile run or a 30-minute Zumba class or whatever and think they "earned" a reward, so they go eat a 600-calorie ice cream sundae or some such. Heck, you could do a 5-mile run and wipe that extra deficit out (plus some!) in less than 5 minutes by stopping off at McDonalds for a Big Mac and fries on the way home.
Andrei doesn't really dive into it much in the article above other than to mention diet, but there are a lot of people who believe their calorie burns during cardio are a lot higher than they actually are. How many threads have we seen claiming something like an 1100 calorie burn from a 60 minute cardio class, or that they're burning 2000 calories a day in exercise? Yeah, not unless you just happened to do an Ironman length triathlon today. Hence, the frequently seen MFP advice to eat back a portion of your exercise calories rather than all of them, and adjust as necessary.
But you can burn 1000 calories in 90 minutes doing a hard workout. That makes a huge difference to what you can eat even if you just eat half.
The vast, vast majority of people aren't burning 1000 calories in a 90 minute workout. And that's exactly where the problem begins. "I burned 1000 calories, so I get to eat an extra 1000 today, woo hoo!". Followed shortly thereafter by a thread crying because they're not losing weight and they don't understand why.7 -
KellyPoetry wrote: »*When i watch the fitess, leanest YouTube bloggers, they all suggest that to burn fat and build lean muscle to do HIIT!
High intensity interval training...
Rather than spend hours on the treadmill or elliptical,doing 10-20 mins of a full body HIIT workout is most effective for fit goals,blasting FAT, and apparently most effective!!!check out Whitney simmons or.otjer YouTube vids.
I love my elliptical, but I started incorporating HIIT and I feel it challenge my body multiple ways. I always feel like I have a friggin good workout with HIIT
Supersets that burn out the muscle while.keeping your heart rate up
In 10mins you can get a good workout!
Cheers, Kelly
There's a lot of hype about HIIT right now, it's quite trendy. But a few points:
1) Most of what is being marketed as HIIT isn't actually HIIT. It's aerobic intervals.
2) HIIT doesn't "blast fat" and isn't "most effective" for all fitness goals.
3) For people who are also weight training, doing too much HIIT can impair recovery and adversely affect performance in the weight room. The CNS stress imposed by HIIT is similar in nature to that of strength training. Most of the credible sources I've read (not YouTube bloggers) recommend HIIT only be done 1-2 times/week.
4) A 10-minute HIIT workout isn't going to burn near as many calories as a 45-minute steady state cardio workout.
5) HIIT is almost always an inappropriate choice of modality for beginning exercisers. They don't have the cardiovascular/aerobic base for it, haven't developed the appropriate strength in connective tissues, nor have they developed the workload capacity to handle it (if it's actually HIIT that's being done in the first place). HIIT, if done properly, is highly unpleasant/uncomfortable. If you're not completely exhausted and near puking at the end of the workout, what you just did wasn't HIIT. A beginning exerciser who undertakes a HIIT routine (if it's actually HIIT) will experience incredible DOMS (delayed onset muscle soreness), runs a good chance of being injured, and will probably never want to work out again unless they have highly masochistic tendencies.8 -
Short answer: YES. HIIT (aka interval) training, mixed with LISS (long interval steady state, think traditional cardio), couple with HIGH REP resistance training is best combo for fat loss with minimal loss of muscle mass
https://doctoryessis.com/2013/01/01/do-you-need-high-repetitions-for-strength/
9 -
parrishdb71 wrote: »Short answer: YES. HIIT (aka interval) training, mixed with LISS (long interval steady state, think traditional cardio), couple with HIGH REP resistance training is best combo for fat loss with minimal loss of muscle mass
https://doctoryessis.com/2013/01/01/do-you-need-high-repetitions-for-strength/
Know how I know you didn't read any of the comments in this thread?5
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.5K Getting Started
- 259.7K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.6K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 390 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.7K Motivation and Support
- 7.8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.2K MyFitnessPal Information
- 22 News and Announcements
- 922 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.3K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions