Can I skip cardio and just strength train?

I am looking to loose weight but want to have a lean tone body when I finally take off the weight. I am tracking my food and eating at a deficit. I know that alone will help me loose do I need to do cardio and strength? What are the benefits/disadvantaged of doing both or wither or
«1

Replies

  • Josh_lol
    Josh_lol Posts: 317 Member
    ^Pretty much answers it. Deficit for losing weight. Cardio is better for just heart health and feeling fitter. If you just want to focus on toning up your body, you can choose to just strength train.
  • sardelsa
    sardelsa Posts: 9,812 Member
    Cardio is great for health, fitness and helping add to your calorie deficit. But no, it is not necessary to maintain muscle/tone up. Follow a progressive lifting program, get adequate protein and don't go too steep in deficit for best chance at muscle retention.
  • Okiludy
    Okiludy Posts: 558 Member
    Another thing is don't try to have the deficit too severe. Set MFP to maybe lose .5-1lbs a week. More than that it might affect your lifts faster than it needs to and you might lose more muscle mass than if you take it a bit slower.
  • Marykaylady2010
    Marykaylady2010 Posts: 69 Member
    Thanks I was really hoping that was the answer.
  • bbell1985
    bbell1985 Posts: 4,571 Member
    That's what I did/do.

    The only time I was I did cardio is when I start getting into bikini mode and the weight loss is like the speed of death. Still, I don't do it because I loathe it.
  • Sp1tfire
    Sp1tfire Posts: 1,120 Member
    if you do some cardio with it you could have some extra calories to enjoy but it won't be necessary!
  • BNY721
    BNY721 Posts: 125 Member
    While I am not crazy about cardio, I do it as it tends to give me more energy. You can certainly forgo it and just strength train. I did one or the other, but now I do both..albeit the cardio is minimal (20 mins 3-4 times a week vs lifting 6 days a week for 1.5 hours).
  • bbell1985
    bbell1985 Posts: 4,571 Member
    rybo wrote: »
    I don't understand such an anti-cardio bias on a "fitness" message board.

    Ok. Would you like to ask a question? I think it is okay for people to dislike cardio.
  • Unknown
    edited February 2018
    This content has been removed.
  • Marykaylady2010
    Marykaylady2010 Posts: 69 Member
    I personally find cardio to be incredibly boring in the summer I don’t mind going for a jog or bike ride but stationary equipment makes me want to die. Most of the time I am in some way uncomfortable no matter what type of machine I use something starts to hurt or go numb. I do my strength workout with short rests in between and do work up a sweat. Lifting will give me long term results where as cardio gives me extra calories to eat for a moment I’d rather put the work in someplace else if I don’t need it to reach my goal
  • bbell1985
    bbell1985 Posts: 4,571 Member
    edited February 2018
    rybo wrote: »
    JerSchmare wrote: »
    rybo wrote: »
    I don't understand such an anti-cardio bias on a "fitness" message board.

    Primarily, it’s boring, and for most people, it doesn’t give the result people want. Lifting gives the results.

    There are an infinite different ways to get in "cardio", it doesn't need to be mind numbing torture on a machine and its a HUGE component of overall fitness. I'll agree that many people misguidedly turn to cardio and expect results that only strength training can give, but to completely discount doing any cardio and being boastful about it as many people are, seems very short sighted.

    Meh. I'm not being boastful. I spend time doing things I love and less or no time doing things I hate. And I think I'm pretty healthy and for as much of a hard time I give myself, think I look pretty decent without cardio. And I know there are forms of cardio I like...but I don't have time to join a *kitten* tennis club or volleyball team.
  • YogiJear
    YogiJear Posts: 118 Member
    rybo wrote: »
    JerSchmare wrote: »
    rybo wrote: »
    I don't understand such an anti-cardio bias on a "fitness" message board.

    Primarily, it’s boring, and for most people, it doesn’t give the result people want. Lifting gives the results.

    There are an infinite different ways to get in "cardio", it doesn't need to be mind numbing torture on a machine and its a HUGE component of overall fitness. I'll agree that many people misguidedly turn to cardio and expect results that only strength training can give, but to completely discount doing any cardio and being boastful about it as many people are, seems very short sighted.

    I can only speak for myself but I don't think I was "anti" cardio. It's got great health benefits especially for cardiovascular health. But for the purpose of the question, "Do I need to do cardio and strength when one is looking to lose weight and is already tracking their food intake and eating a deficit?" I'd say cardio's not necessary. I gave a quick caveat that it's good for heart health but there's myriads of other benefits that can be had from cardio, I just didn't get into it as the question wasn't "What are the benefits of cardio and why should I do it?".
  • sardelsa
    sardelsa Posts: 9,812 Member
    spartan_d wrote: »
    rybo wrote: »
    JerSchmare wrote: »
    rybo wrote: »
    I don't understand such an anti-cardio bias on a "fitness" message board.

    Primarily, it’s boring, and for most people, it doesn’t give the result people want. Lifting gives the results.

    There are an infinite different ways to get in "cardio", it doesn't need to be mind numbing torture on a machine and its a HUGE component of overall fitness. I'll agree that many people misguidedly turn to cardio and expect results that only strength training can give, but to completely discount doing any cardio and being boastful about it as many people are, seems very short sighted.
    I completely agree. Try running up a steep hill and see how much help those deadlifts and squats will be. They'll help with leg strength, but they won't give you much cardiovascular endurance -- and in the real world, there will most likely be times when you'll need it.

    I walk up stairs multiple times a day as part of my life so I'd be fine. I don't know if being generally active counts as cardio, but it's what I do. And a few months ago I ran home for fun (I am not a runner at all) and I couldn't believe how easy it was with more lower body muscle.. my legs had so much power and speed..it was like riding on top of a horse.
  • bbell1985
    bbell1985 Posts: 4,571 Member
    sardelsa wrote: »
    spartan_d wrote: »
    rybo wrote: »
    JerSchmare wrote: »
    rybo wrote: »
    I don't understand such an anti-cardio bias on a "fitness" message board.

    Primarily, it’s boring, and for most people, it doesn’t give the result people want. Lifting gives the results.

    There are an infinite different ways to get in "cardio", it doesn't need to be mind numbing torture on a machine and its a HUGE component of overall fitness. I'll agree that many people misguidedly turn to cardio and expect results that only strength training can give, but to completely discount doing any cardio and being boastful about it as many people are, seems very short sighted.
    I completely agree. Try running up a steep hill and see how much help those deadlifts and squats will be. They'll help with leg strength, but they won't give you much cardiovascular endurance -- and in the real world, there will most likely be times when you'll need it.

    I walk up stairs multiple times a day as part of my life so I'd be fine. I don't know if being generally active counts as cardio, but it's what I do. And a few months ago I ran home for fun (I am not a runner at all) and I couldn't believe how easy it was with more lower body muscle.. my legs had so much power and speed..it was like riding on top of a horse.

    lol riding on top of a horse. I have an awesome image of you right now. It's very magical.
  • sardelsa
    sardelsa Posts: 9,812 Member
    bbell1985 wrote: »
    sardelsa wrote: »
    spartan_d wrote: »
    rybo wrote: »
    JerSchmare wrote: »
    rybo wrote: »
    I don't understand such an anti-cardio bias on a "fitness" message board.

    Primarily, it’s boring, and for most people, it doesn’t give the result people want. Lifting gives the results.

    There are an infinite different ways to get in "cardio", it doesn't need to be mind numbing torture on a machine and its a HUGE component of overall fitness. I'll agree that many people misguidedly turn to cardio and expect results that only strength training can give, but to completely discount doing any cardio and being boastful about it as many people are, seems very short sighted.
    I completely agree. Try running up a steep hill and see how much help those deadlifts and squats will be. They'll help with leg strength, but they won't give you much cardiovascular endurance -- and in the real world, there will most likely be times when you'll need it.

    I walk up stairs multiple times a day as part of my life so I'd be fine. I don't know if being generally active counts as cardio, but it's what I do. And a few months ago I ran home for fun (I am not a runner at all) and I couldn't believe how easy it was with more lower body muscle.. my legs had so much power and speed..it was like riding on top of a horse.

    lol riding on top of a horse. I have an awesome image of you right now. It's very magical.

    :D ... It really was magical.. I was my own unicorn :p
  • bbell1985
    bbell1985 Posts: 4,571 Member
    sardelsa wrote: »
    bbell1985 wrote: »
    sardelsa wrote: »
    spartan_d wrote: »
    rybo wrote: »
    JerSchmare wrote: »
    rybo wrote: »
    I don't understand such an anti-cardio bias on a "fitness" message board.

    Primarily, it’s boring, and for most people, it doesn’t give the result people want. Lifting gives the results.

    There are an infinite different ways to get in "cardio", it doesn't need to be mind numbing torture on a machine and its a HUGE component of overall fitness. I'll agree that many people misguidedly turn to cardio and expect results that only strength training can give, but to completely discount doing any cardio and being boastful about it as many people are, seems very short sighted.
    I completely agree. Try running up a steep hill and see how much help those deadlifts and squats will be. They'll help with leg strength, but they won't give you much cardiovascular endurance -- and in the real world, there will most likely be times when you'll need it.

    I walk up stairs multiple times a day as part of my life so I'd be fine. I don't know if being generally active counts as cardio, but it's what I do. And a few months ago I ran home for fun (I am not a runner at all) and I couldn't believe how easy it was with more lower body muscle.. my legs had so much power and speed..it was like riding on top of a horse.

    lol riding on top of a horse. I have an awesome image of you right now. It's very magical.

    :D ... It really was magical.. I was my own unicorn :p

    ahahahaha. That's what I was picturing and there is so much glitter and booty.
  • flowerhorsey
    flowerhorsey Posts: 154 Member
    I am looking to loose weight but want to have a lean tone body when I finally take off the weight. I am tracking my food and eating at a deficit. I know that alone will help me loose do I need to do cardio and strength? What are the benefits/disadvantaged of doing both or wither or

    I've done cardio my entire fitness life since I was about fourteen years old... And I always loved it and loved how it made me feel... That being said, I started weight training about eight or so months ago and love it a hundred times more. Same or better adrenalin, more sweat, and more defined muscles for sure compared to when I only did cardio.
  • spartan_d
    spartan_d Posts: 727 Member
    sardelsa wrote: »
    spartan_d wrote: »
    rybo wrote: »
    JerSchmare wrote: »
    rybo wrote: »
    I don't understand such an anti-cardio bias on a "fitness" message board.

    Primarily, it’s boring, and for most people, it doesn’t give the result people want. Lifting gives the results.

    There are an infinite different ways to get in "cardio", it doesn't need to be mind numbing torture on a machine and its a HUGE component of overall fitness. I'll agree that many people misguidedly turn to cardio and expect results that only strength training can give, but to completely discount doing any cardio and being boastful about it as many people are, seems very short sighted.
    I completely agree. Try running up a steep hill and see how much help those deadlifts and squats will be. They'll help with leg strength, but they won't give you much cardiovascular endurance -- and in the real world, there will most likely be times when you'll need it.

    I walk up stairs multiple times a day as part of my life so I'd be fine. I don't know if being generally active counts as cardio, but it's what I do. And a few months ago I ran home for fun (I am not a runner at all) and I couldn't believe how easy it was with more lower body muscle.. my legs had so much power and speed..it was like riding on top of a horse.

    Leg strength is certainly an important component. There are other factors too though, such as lactate threshold, hip mobility, training the central nervous system, and ensuring a lack of muscular imbalances.

    A lot of people hate running, and so they say foolish things like, "I'm never going to need to do so" or "In an emergency, I'm just going to rely on adrenaline." Obviously, that's just being foolhardy. A certain amount of running is necessary for well-rounded overall functional fitness.
  • spartan_d
    spartan_d Posts: 727 Member
    bbell1985 wrote: »
    If the light is about to change, I can make it across the street in time. If I need to run a few miles without stopping, I can. (Though I cannot think of one single time I have needed to run for more than 5 minutes for something).
    These situations come up all the time. One gym owner told me about how she had to run several miles after learning that there was no shuttle to take her back to her car. She had to run FAST as well to make it to this class. She wasn't a runner though, and if not for a bit of occasional treadmill work, she probably wouldn't have made it.

    I once had to run through an airport carrying someone else's luggage to help her reach her flight. If I hadn't been properly conditioned, she might not have made it.

    Just because these situations haven't occurred to someone yet doesn't mean that they won't. It's always best to be ready.
    I lift things EVERY DAY. Constantly. I can't think of any reason I would need to run on a daily basis.
    Nobody said it has to be daily. Very few runners do that. Some occasional running is invaluable, though.
  • cwolfman13
    cwolfman13 Posts: 41,865 Member
    edited February 2018
    I am looking to loose weight but want to have a lean tone body when I finally take off the weight. I am tracking my food and eating at a deficit. I know that alone will help me loose do I need to do cardio and strength? What are the benefits/disadvantaged of doing both or wither or

    Personally, I think both are important to your overall health and fitness. Cardio is short for cardiovascular...your heart, lungs, etc...doing cardio is really good for your cardiovascular health.

    There are tons of options to choose from...way more than just droning away on a treadmill or elliptical or whatever. I primarily cycle, do some rock climbing, and enjoy a good hike in the mountains.
  • MeanderingMammal
    MeanderingMammal Posts: 7,866 Member
    I am looking to loose weight but want to have a lean tone body when I finally take off the weight. I am tracking my food and eating at a deficit. I know that alone will help me loose do I need to do cardio and strength? What are the benefits/disadvantaged of doing both or wither or

    If you're not worried about aerobic endurance and cardiovascular efficiency, don't do any cardiovascular work. The bonus is, nobody is going to tell you that you're wrong if you choose not to.