Discover what's new & improved in the MyFitnessPal app!
We’re dedicated to helping you achieve your health and nutrition goals. And our newest features and updates? They do just that. Learn how we're making tracking your progress easier, faster, and more motivating than ever.

Ruining Metabolism, Cheat days, etc.

Options
Hi! I'm looking for information on current nutritional advice and research on how much of a calorie deficit and reduction from normal leads to a "wrecked" metabolism. I started MFP 2 weeks ago, 160 lb female at 5'7" and 38 years old. I have stayed just under the 1280 calories plus about 300 that I eat back from exercising each day, during these two weeks. I have lost 1.5 lbs a week, which is fine with me. However, I am eating much, much less than I did before I started and want to know what the current understanding is "wrecking" your metabolism. Also, a friend recommended a cheat day once a week so that my metabolism stays high, and I know nothing about that idea. Thank you!

Replies

  • MichelleSilverleaf
    MichelleSilverleaf Posts: 2,027 Member
    Options
    I think it would honestly take a lot more and a lot longer to truly wreck your metabolism, but depending on what weight you're trying to get to that 1.5lb/week may still be a little on the aggressive side. Certainly not an amount you're going to be able to keep up all the way to goal anyway. I wouldn't bother with a cheat day myself, I don't find the point of them and when you don't have a lot to lose a cheat day or cheat meal could wipe out your progress, or at least hinder it.
  • amgreenwell
    amgreenwell Posts: 1,267 Member
    Options
    I guess I've never heard that term before "wrecked metabolism". I just know you eat less calories than you burn you will lose weight. If you work out on top of that then you are keeping your metabolism going as well.
    I don't do cheat days either, I fit whatever I'm going to eat that day into my calorie count or I work out more so that I can eat whatever it might be that I want. I don't want to deprive myself of anything.
    I also log everything I eat in the morning so I know where I stand from the beginning of the day.
  • jjpptt2
    jjpptt2 Posts: 5,650 Member
    Options
    I haven't read anything that stated specific numbers, but based on what I think I might know, I think damaged metabolisms fall more in line with the following -
    1. malnutrition
    2. significant calorie deficit - well below BMR (not simply below "normal" eating, whatever that is)
    3. both 1 and 2 occurring consistently for an extended period of time - much longer than what most people think when they talk about these types of topics.
  • littlebear0121
    littlebear0121 Posts: 1,073 Member
    Options
    amgreenwell, I love your ideas. Thank you. Thank you, jjpptt2 for your explanation.
  • AnnPT77
    AnnPT77 Posts: 33,041 Member
    Options
    Common rule of thumb around here is to lose no more than 1% of your body weight weekly, and less than that is better when you get close to goal (say a pound a week at 25 or so to goal, half a pound at around 10 or so).

    "Wrecked" metabolism isn't really a thing, but we risk negative health consequences by losing too fast - one is a tendency for fatigue to subtly slow down our daily activity level and thus slow our weight loss; another is unnecessary muscle loss that can do a similar thing.

    This thread is informative:

    http://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/10569458/why-eating-too-little-calories-is-a-bad-idea