Is the idea that we should gain just a little as we age a fallacy?

It's generally accepted that we (women in particular) will inevitably gain some weight as we age, and that if it is not too much (not sure how much exactly), it isn't a problem. Or at least that is what I pick up through the media etc.

Is this a fallacy? Can anyone comment on this - obviously there will be less muscle but what about fat gain?
«13

Replies

  • Pastaprincess1978
    Pastaprincess1978 Posts: 371 Member
    Thanks @AnnPT - I am just speculating too - and I do see your point about how individual factors are very important. Also, like you, I have reached my first goal weight and decided that I want to go for more - so now losing that final 7lb.
  • paperpudding
    paperpudding Posts: 9,278 Member
    I guess it is individual too - when I was 20 I was 46 kg which was actually below bottom of healthy BMI range.

    Several children and several decades later had crept up to 72 - which was overweight with BMI of about 28.

    I lost 10 kg and now sit at 23 - I am happy with that and I don't ever expect or want to get to the weight I was 3 decades ago.
    I think at my age a healthier BMI is not at the bottom of the range. - not for me anyway.
  • annaskiski
    annaskiski Posts: 1,212 Member
    There was a study that people who were a little overweight lived longer. However, followup studies showed that the people who lived longer, were the ones with more muscle mass, not fat.....

    I'll see if I can find the reference.
  • annaskiski
    annaskiski Posts: 1,212 Member
    We'll here's an article regarding muscle mass, study linked.

    http://newsroom.ucla.edu/releases/older-adults-build-muscle-and-271651

  • GottaBurnEmAll
    GottaBurnEmAll Posts: 7,722 Member
    As Ann mentioned, I think the notion stems from the idea that a higher starting weight seemed to be a better predictor of surviving a wasting type of illness and assumed a lot of things like having a higher body fat content as opposed to muscle mass.

    Newer studies that control for those variables dispute the findings, IIRC.

    I weigh less now at almost 56 than I did at my school weigh in when I was 13 years old, and I'm working on losing more vanity weight.

    Muscle is important to me, though, and I take pains to protect it by lifting weights and keeping an eye on my protein intake. I think that's far more important to keep an eye on as you age than packing on a few pounds of fat.
  • try2again
    try2again Posts: 3,562 Member
    I'm not sure I've ever heard it said that a person *should* gain weight as they age, but I think the health risks associated with extra weight may go down with time. I've used this calculator before- https://www.smartbmicalculator.com/ - which takes age & gender into account, and it seems to suggest that, as a person ages, the healthy range for one's weight becomes broader, though I wonder if that just reflects that an older person has less time for weight-related health concerns to crop up?

  • AnnPT77
    AnnPT77 Posts: 34,168 Member
    annaskiski wrote: »
    We'll here's an article regarding muscle mass, study linked.

    http://newsroom.ucla.edu/releases/older-adults-build-muscle-and-271651

    While I think there's great value and the point being made, it's worth noting that this is a correlation, not established as a cause. In particular, muscle mass may also be correlated with other beneficial health practices in those people.

    Not that I'd argue against increasing muscle mass at any age! Strength is functionally useful, and the people I see around me who are strong at older ages are not just more independent, they're healthier in a diversity of ways (fewer drugs needed, fewer surgeries, faster recovery, and more - though this is likely a result of multiple healthy habits). It doesn't much matter which direction the causation arrows point, in this complex of positive behaviors and positive outcomes. The net result is worth pursuing.
  • CarvedTones
    CarvedTones Posts: 2,340 Member
    edited May 2018
    try2again wrote: »
    I'm not sure I've ever heard it said that a person *should* gain weight as they age, but I think the health risks associated with extra weight may go down with time. I've used this calculator before- https://www.smartbmicalculator.com/ - which takes age & gender into account, and it seems to suggest that, as a person ages, the healthy range for one's weight becomes broader, though I wonder if that just reflects that an older person has less time for weight-related health concerns to crop up?

    Sort of related, there is a new study out that says a man at age 50 who doesn't smoke, has a healthy BMI, exercises regularly, eats a healthy diet and does not drink excessively has a life expectancy 12.2 years longer. It has to be all 5 and I don't know what the criteria for the subjective ones is; I read an article about the study rather than the study itself. But what is related was a comment made (I think by Gupta in a side bar video) that getting there at 60 or 70 is almost as good if you have dodged the bullets (cancer, heart disease and diabetes) so far. It was all about lowering your likelihood of dying from the common causes.
  • CSARdiver
    CSARdiver Posts: 6,252 Member
    Physiologically there is little difference in metabolism. The primary driver being body mass.

    Socially speaking it is normal, understood, and accepted, but I believe that is changing recently and more are not accepting diminished activity as they age.

    So you could use it as an excuse, but it's not a very good one.
  • cwolfman13
    cwolfman13 Posts: 41,865 Member
    edited May 2018
    Don't know how true it is, but I have read that the human body has a biological propensity for greater fat storage as we age. Not that being overly fat is acceptable, but that a 40 year old male for example might have an ideal BF% of 15% vs a 20 year old who might have an ideal BF% of sub 10% and that much of this has to do with hormones.

    I can maintain pretty well at 12-15% BF...I have a tremendous amount of difficulty dropping below that and I've always kind of hypothesized that it's a biological aging thing and that my 43 year old body doesn't want to be super lean...IDK. When I was in my 20s I had zero problem being sub 10%...but then again, I was a lot more active in my daily life though I did very little in the way of deliberate exercise and I ate whatever I could get my hands on.
  • nettiklive
    nettiklive Posts: 206 Member
    I don't know the biology, but from personal experience of what I see around me, plenty of young women effortlessly maintain a trim body with no exercise and lightly active or fairly sedentary lifestyles. But only very very few older women keep the same shape, and those are usually ones who are hardcore into fitness and make it a huge part of their lives. I'd say 95% of women over 50 I meet have a tummy and generally some excess fat and flabbiness all around. My maternal grandmother for instance, was borderline underweight all her life; never exercised ('fitness' wasn't really a thing for women back then as it is now) never mind lifted weights, and maintained a slender figure with a washboard-flat stomach and tiny waist even after giving birth. Once she hit her 70s she started complaining that she's gaining weight in spite of eating less and less (she always ate healthy and was never a big eater) and had trouble losing the 20 or so lbs that crept up around her middle.
  • RoxieDawn
    RoxieDawn Posts: 15,488 Member
    I've never heard of this and since I am turning 50 in a few months I should probably look at this closer.

    When we age what I do understand is body fat ranges can change, bone density, muscle mass, etc. I would have to look at this closer from body fat point of view, since we have 3 types of fat: subcutaneous (under the skin), visceral (around the organs), and intramuscular (in between muscle). I am assuming that we can have the same subcutaneous body fat, but the visceral and intramuscular fat may increase as you age. I have to look at this closer when I have more time. :smile:
  • AnnPT77
    AnnPT77 Posts: 34,168 Member
    I just had a thought - well, a couple of them. (It was hard work! ;) ).

    1. I had a good long think about all the people I know who are materially older than me (I'm 62, so people in 70s and 80s). Those whose current lifestyle I think I could enjoy are not significantly overweight (maybe 5-10 vanity pounds or thereabouts).

    Among those whose current lifestyle I could tolerate are some who are probably up around the overweight/obese line, but they're fairly active. Pretty much all of those who are definitely obese are in lives I wouldn't choose voluntarily (as to capabilities, independence, health). (I'm sure there are some out there who are obese, 70+, leading enviable lives, healthy lives, but I can't think of any among my acquaintance.)

    It's anecdotal, and a clearly biased sample, but it has influenced my thinking - how I'd place bets, if I were a betting woman.

    This was an interesting thought experiment. What do others see around them in their lives?

    2. I'm surprised to read so many people say they've never heard the theory that we should weigh a bit more as we age. I've heard it fairly frequently.

    I had a think about who I've heard it from, IRL (as opposed to blogs and such). Yes, it was from people I'd consider over-fat, i.e. mostly up around the overweight/obese border and beyond.

    Now, it makes sense that people who believe this would want to be a little heavier, for their health. But I don't think I've ever heard anyone who was thin and healthy say they'd like to gain a bit for the sake of their health (maybe some who were thin after illness). Again, why would they, if they think it's healthy to be thin.

    Still, food for thought about motivations.
  • MegaMooseEsq
    MegaMooseEsq Posts: 3,118 Member
    ryenday wrote: »
    Ann, I have heard fairly often that a few extra pounds in old age are better than being underweight. Like you, I can’t recall the source, EXCEPT for my friend the nurse.

    Her observation is also, obviously, anecdotal, but she believes the older folks who are carrying that ‘vanity’ weight (that is if she saw them outside the hospital she’d say they could lose a little weight but didn’t really need to) come through most of the hospital stays better than the overweight/obese or the people that are lower weight (the ones she would recommend To NOT lose any weight.). I asked her about lean folks with lots of muscle and she said most of the folks she sees in the hospital are NOT fit and working out so she has no opinion or relevant observation.

    I've also heard that datapoint about older people having better life expectancy when slightly overweight than at normal or low weights. I've generally assumed that this says more about the dangers of being underweight as you age (and the factors that might cause one to be underweight) than the "benefits" of being slightly overweight. I want to say that more recent studies have controlled for this factor and not found an advantage to being slightly overweight.
  • kimny72
    kimny72 Posts: 16,011 Member
    edited May 2018
    Also, if I could be pedantic for a moment though :smiley: isn't there a difference between vanity lbs and being overweight? And isn't there a difference between "it's bad to be underweight" and "it's good to be a bit overweight"?

    At 5'4 I have been maintaining at @ 125 which is right around the middle of the healthy weight range for my height. If I dropped all the way down to 110, that would be underweight and probably not the best place to be in my 70s if longevity is a goal. But I could gain 10 vanity lbs putting me at 135 and still not be "overweight".

    I'd also guess older folks who are in fact overweight would be more likely to take to heart the idea that the extra weight is protective, simply because it sounds better than "I never figured out how to lose it like I wanted to" :wink:
  • motivatedmartha
    motivatedmartha Posts: 1,108 Member
    The BMI calculator I use asks for your age and I had always assumed that it was taken into account when calculating a healthy BMI range. I do think that if I were to get down to the same weight I was at 18 I would look pretty wrinkly now.
  • CarvedTones
    CarvedTones Posts: 2,340 Member
    ryenday wrote: »
    Ann, I have heard fairly often that a few extra pounds in old age are better than being underweight. Like you, I can’t recall the source, EXCEPT for my friend the nurse.

    Her observation is also, obviously, anecdotal, but she believes the older folks who are carrying that ‘vanity’ weight (that is if she saw them outside the hospital she’d say they could lose a little weight but didn’t really need to) come through most of the hospital stays better than the overweight/obese or the people that are lower weight (the ones she would recommend To NOT lose any weight.). I asked her about lean folks with lots of muscle and she said most of the folks she sees in the hospital are NOT fit and working out so she has no opinion or relevant observation.

    I've also heard that datapoint about older people having better life expectancy when slightly overweight than at normal or low weights. I've generally assumed that this says more about the dangers of being underweight as you age (and the factors that might cause one to be underweight) than the "benefits" of being slightly overweight. I want to say that more recent studies have controlled for this factor and not found an advantage to being slightly overweight.

    I read that overweight but not obese was better than underweight but healthy was best. That was in a study in the news maybe a couple of months ago. I don't find that surprising at all. I know several people who are in great shape at a BMI of 25 to 27 and know of lots more (pro athletes and whatnot); I don't know anyone at 18.5 or below that seems all that healthy. Yeah, that's anecdotal, but with lots of examples of the healthy "overweight" and none for the underweight. I think it is an indictment of the BMI range more than anything. Few people below 20 are very healthy. Lots of people 25-27 are healthy, though many aren't.
  • stanmann571
    stanmann571 Posts: 5,727 Member
    ryenday wrote: »
    Ann, I have heard fairly often that a few extra pounds in old age are better than being underweight. Like you, I can’t recall the source, EXCEPT for my friend the nurse.

    Her observation is also, obviously, anecdotal, but she believes the older folks who are carrying that ‘vanity’ weight (that is if she saw them outside the hospital she’d say they could lose a little weight but didn’t really need to) come through most of the hospital stays better than the overweight/obese or the people that are lower weight (the ones she would recommend To NOT lose any weight.). I asked her about lean folks with lots of muscle and she said most of the folks she sees in the hospital are NOT fit and working out so she has no opinion or relevant observation.

    I've also heard that datapoint about older people having better life expectancy when slightly overweight than at normal or low weights. I've generally assumed that this says more about the dangers of being underweight as you age (and the factors that might cause one to be underweight) than the "benefits" of being slightly overweight. I want to say that more recent studies have controlled for this factor and not found an advantage to being slightly overweight.

    I read that overweight but not obese was better than underweight but healthy was best. That was in a study in the news maybe a couple of months ago. I don't find that surprising at all. I know several people who are in great shape at a BMI of 25 to 27 and know of lots more (pro athletes and whatnot); I don't know anyone at 18.5 or below that seems all that healthy. Yeah, that's anecdotal, but with lots of examples of the healthy "overweight" and none for the underweight. I think it is an indictment of the BMI range more than anything. Few people below 20 are very healthy. Lots of people 25-27 are healthy, though many aren't.

    That is a fair indictment of the BMI range in that there is a "healthy range" Which spans "normal" and "overweight" but isn't actually identified clearly anywhere.