Skinny fat

2»

Replies

  • perkymommy
    perkymommy Posts: 1,642 Member
    The first one is from like 5-6 weeks ago, the one in the yellow shirt is from today and the last one is me flexing.

    I'm 4'11" and my belly is so big I look like I'm 6 months pregnant on an average day. You have no belly fat. Maybe you need to see a therapist? :(
  • jseams1234
    jseams1234 Posts: 1,219 Member
    edited August 2018
    perkymommy wrote: »
    either your scales are wrong or you have a very warped sense of what is a normal amount of bodyfat.

    14% is very low and you are not in any way 'skinny fat'.

    Agree.

    I read somewhere recently that said a healthy BMI is between 25-30. You sound like you are underweight. Maybe you should seek advice from your doctor? Sounds like you have are seeing something that isn't there. I used to be anorexic for years and saw myself as big when I was underweight and stayed under 100 lbs for years. It's something you really can't help when you get to that point but I think you are stressing over something that isn't even a problem.

    That's not accurate -- anything over 25 is considered to be overweight (so an individual with a BMI over 25 may or may not be overweight -- depending on their body fat situation, but they are in the overweight range).

    I think she may have meant body fat % for women and not BMI.
  • TrishSeren
    TrishSeren Posts: 587 Member
    I would say your scales are wrong, you aren't 14% bf because (no offense intended :smile: ) if you were you'd look like a female body builder, and you don't.

    I'd say work on trying to gain some muscle, perhaps that might help you achieve the look you're wanting to achieve.
  • ladyhusker39
    ladyhusker39 Posts: 1,406 Member
    There's a member here who recently posted pictures of herself at around 130 lbs and then again at 150 lbs but much more muscle definition. She look amazing when she was 20 lbs heavier.

    Does anyone here remember who that was or maybe post that thread? I think this visual might help OP see how she could look and that it's not at all just about the number on the scale.
  • psuLemon
    psuLemon Posts: 38,427 MFP Moderator
    There's a member here who recently posted pictures of herself at around 130 lbs and then again at 150 lbs but much more muscle definition. She look amazing when she was 20 lbs heavier.

    Does anyone here remember who that was or maybe post that thread? I think this visual might help OP see how she could look and that it's not at all just about the number on the scale.

    Are you thinking of Staci from the link i posted?
  • TrishSeren
    TrishSeren Posts: 587 Member
    jseams1234 wrote: »
    TrishSeren wrote: »
    I would say your scales are wrong, you aren't 14% bf because (no offense intended :smile: ) if you were you'd look like a female body builder, and you don't.

    I'd say work on trying to gain some muscle, perhaps that might help you achieve the look you're wanting to achieve.

    Body fat doesn't exactly tell you much about composition. Example:

    wgexmvm0ly7s.jpg

    True.
  • Noreenmarie1234
    Noreenmarie1234 Posts: 7,492 Member
    edited August 2018
    I REALLY suggest recomp. (Bulk/cut cycles)

    There was a poster in here who posted I think her recomp success in the fitness forum and it was SO incredible, but I couldn't find it. Anyone know who I am talking about? She is a regular poster I see around, but can't remember who. She posted a thread showing her bulk and cut cycles and end product was absolutely incredible and so fit and lean. I think that is what you need. Losing more weight isn't going to help when you are already underweight.

    Here is an example I could find since I cant find the thread on here.

    1fehgox3kdgd.png
    xodghq1i4hti.png

  • Noreenmarie1234
    Noreenmarie1234 Posts: 7,492 Member
    edited August 2018
    Edit: I found it. It just shows how much your body comp and aesthetic can change with a bulk/cut cycle. Since you are underweight, you should consider bulking to a healthy weight incorporating a good strength training program. I honestly think you will have a better body aesthetic at a higher weight with a gain in muscle mass and thus more muscle definition.

    https://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/10684001/pics-of-bulks-cuts-from-start-to-now-because-my-four-year-mfp-anniversary-is-today/p1
  • collectingblues
    collectingblues Posts: 2,541 Member
    TrishSeren wrote: »
    TrishSeren wrote: »
    I would say your scales are wrong, you aren't 14% bf because (no offense intended :smile: ) if you were you'd look like a female body builder, and you don't.

    I'd say work on trying to gain some muscle, perhaps that might help you achieve the look you're wanting to achieve.

    Considering that she's significantly underweight, 14% BF is not out of the realm of possibility. She just doesn't have the muscles to go with it.

    I must have a warped view because when I look at that photo of her I don't see her being significantly underweight. I can't see her ribs, her arms and legs look like a normal size and she has some ab muscle. I understand that by numbers she is "underweight" but in that photo, I think she just looks slim but not unhealthy or underweight.

    Obviously, there is zero need for her to lose weight. I can see that, but I just wouldn't call her "significantly underweight".

    Perhaps maybe I have issues with perception too... hmmmm...


    What Kim said. By the numbers, she's significantly underweight.

    If you want to claim that someone with a BMI of 17.2 isn't underweight, you've got issues that are best left to a professional.
  • WilmaValley
    WilmaValley Posts: 1,092 Member
    This is a very low BMI, not healthy