Why don’t the numbers add up?

LosinIt54
Posts: 37 Member
I just scanned a piece of pork loin from the supermarket. The info came up (per 2 oz):
85 calories
0 carbs
4 fat
10 protein
So...if carbs and protein are 4 calories per gram and fat is 9 calories per gram, how come that only adds up to 76 calories, yet the nutritional information, from the grocery store is over 10% different at 85 calories?
I notice this a lot. Can someone explain? Am I missing something?
Thank you, MFP friends.
85 calories
0 carbs
4 fat
10 protein
So...if carbs and protein are 4 calories per gram and fat is 9 calories per gram, how come that only adds up to 76 calories, yet the nutritional information, from the grocery store is over 10% different at 85 calories?
I notice this a lot. Can someone explain? Am I missing something?
Thank you, MFP friends.
0
Replies
-
Rounding up and down happens.
Use the USDA data base for double checking.
Cheers, h.3 -
I just scanned a piece of pork loin from the supermarket. The info came up (per 2 oz):
85 calories
0 carbs
4 fat
10 protein
So...if carbs and protein are 4 calories per gram and fat is 9 calories per gram, how come that only adds up to 76 calories, yet the nutritional information, from the grocery store is over 10% different at 85 calories?
I notice this a lot. Can someone explain? Am I missing something?
Thank you, MFP friends.
even scanned entries can be off. they are entered by users as well. one reason I stopped scanning my food bar codes
0 -
So what values do you use?0
-
-
As I mentioned above. The USDA Data base, for packaged items the package or the mfg website.
https://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/10621050/how-to-use-the-usda-food-database-mfp-food-database-for-accurate-logging/p1
Cheers, h.0 -
U.S. law allows the nutrition label calories to be 20% away from accurate. That happens because manufacturers captured the regulators and wrote the laws in such a way that the manufacturers will never lose a lawsuit over nutrition labels.0
-
-
JeromeBarry1 wrote: »U.S. law allows the nutrition label calories to be 20% away from accurate. That happens because manufacturers captured the regulators and wrote the laws in such a way that the manufacturers will never lose a lawsuit over nutrition labels.
yes and that is per serving too
0 -
middlehaitch wrote: »Rounding up and down happens.
Use the USDA data base for double checking.
Cheers, h.
The numbers on the label are whole numbers. In the real world, a serving of food does not have to contain a whole number of grams of any particular macro.
4 (0.49 g carbs + 10.49 g protein) + 9 (4.49 g fat) = 43.92 + 40.41 = 84.33 calories
I believe they're allowed to round to the nearest 5 calories (and above some level, they can round to the nearest 10 calories.
Mystery solved. No discrepancy.2 -
Thanks all1
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 395K Introduce Yourself
- 44K Getting Started
- 260.6K Health and Weight Loss
- 176.2K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.7K Fitness and Exercise
- 444 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153.2K Motivation and Support
- 8.2K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 4.2K MyFitnessPal Information
- 16 News and Announcements
- 1.3K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.9K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions