Why don’t the numbers add up?

LosinIt54
LosinIt54 Posts: 37 Member
edited November 2024 in Food and Nutrition
I just scanned a piece of pork loin from the supermarket. The info came up (per 2 oz):
85 calories
0 carbs
4 fat
10 protein

So...if carbs and protein are 4 calories per gram and fat is 9 calories per gram, how come that only adds up to 76 calories, yet the nutritional information, from the grocery store is over 10% different at 85 calories?
I notice this a lot. Can someone explain? Am I missing something?
Thank you, MFP friends.

Replies

  • middlehaitch
    middlehaitch Posts: 8,488 Member
    Rounding up and down happens.
    Use the USDA data base for double checking.

    Cheers, h.
  • LosinIt54 wrote: »
    I just scanned a piece of pork loin from the supermarket. The info came up (per 2 oz):
    85 calories
    0 carbs
    4 fat
    10 protein

    So...if carbs and protein are 4 calories per gram and fat is 9 calories per gram, how come that only adds up to 76 calories, yet the nutritional information, from the grocery store is over 10% different at 85 calories?
    I notice this a lot. Can someone explain? Am I missing something?
    Thank you, MFP friends.

    even scanned entries can be off. they are entered by users as well. one reason I stopped scanning my food bar codes
  • LosinIt54
    LosinIt54 Posts: 37 Member
    So what values do you use?
  • LosinIt54 wrote: »
    So what values do you use?

    I look up whats on the package and cross reference and find an entry that matches it or I make a new one, I also use the USDA database like Middlehaitch mentioned.
  • middlehaitch
    middlehaitch Posts: 8,488 Member
    As I mentioned above. The USDA Data base, for packaged items the package or the mfg website.

    https://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/10621050/how-to-use-the-usda-food-database-mfp-food-database-for-accurate-logging/p1

    Cheers, h.
  • JeromeBarry1
    JeromeBarry1 Posts: 10,179 Member
    U.S. law allows the nutrition label calories to be 20% away from accurate. That happens because manufacturers captured the regulators and wrote the laws in such a way that the manufacturers will never lose a lawsuit over nutrition labels.
  • JeromeBarry1
    JeromeBarry1 Posts: 10,179 Member
    LosinIt54 wrote: »
    So what values do you use?

    It's almost impossible to make a recommendation. Pick a method. Use it. Evaluate it after a month.
  • U.S. law allows the nutrition label calories to be 20% away from accurate. That happens because manufacturers captured the regulators and wrote the laws in such a way that the manufacturers will never lose a lawsuit over nutrition labels.

    yes and that is per serving too
  • lynn_glenmont
    lynn_glenmont Posts: 10,147 Member
    Rounding up and down happens.
    Use the USDA data base for double checking.

    Cheers, h.

    The numbers on the label are whole numbers. In the real world, a serving of food does not have to contain a whole number of grams of any particular macro.

    4 (0.49 g carbs + 10.49 g protein) + 9 (4.49 g fat) = 43.92 + 40.41 = 84.33 calories

    I believe they're allowed to round to the nearest 5 calories (and above some level, they can round to the nearest 10 calories.

    Mystery solved. No discrepancy.
  • LosinIt54
    LosinIt54 Posts: 37 Member
    Thanks all
This discussion has been closed.