DNA kit to test best diet and exercise

I just purchased a DNA kit that will test what diet and exercise program is best for my body. Has anyone done one of these and did the results make a difference when followed?
«134

Replies

  • LaReinaDeCorazones
    LaReinaDeCorazones Posts: 274 Member
    Only DNA test I did was for ancestry, never heard of this other 1
  • MelanieCN77
    MelanieCN77 Posts: 4,047 Member
    I've been curious about what it could tell about physical makeup but I don't think it is really going to be of much assistance diet wise. I did 23 and Me years ago and that has a very few of those kinds of details, like it told me I am more likely to be a sprinter than an endurance type of athlete, which I'm honestly not sure is true but don't know how I am supposed to test that without a big old experiment I just don't have the bandwidth for. At some point if I have a spare $200 I will probably do a fitness one though, maybe after things develop a little more considering the above comment about studies.
  • Sunshine_And_Sand
    Sunshine_And_Sand Posts: 1,320 Member
    OP, any "diet"/exercise program that gives u results uses the same principle, calories in less than calories out, or CICO/a calorie deficit.
    If I eat for my blood type with a calorie deficit, do low carb/keto with a deficit, eat "clean" with a deficit, eat raw vegan with a deficit, or eat only twinkies with a deficit, I will lose weight.
    If I was maintaining without exercise and added exercise without changing my calorie intake, I'd lose weight. Also, if I maintained my same activity level (even if it involved sitting on the couch and watching TV all day) but decreased my intake to achieve a deficit, I would lose weight.
    So, if you do whatever your DNA kit says for u to do and it works, it proves nothing, other than you were in a calorie deficit. I supppse you could still call it a success, but you could have that success without paying for the DNA kit.
    I think eating what they recommend but with a deliberately high calorie surplus would be more "proof" bc then you would see that even "healthy" foods in excess/calorie surplus cause weight gain.
  • MikePfirrman
    MikePfirrman Posts: 3,307 Member
    After working in the industry, I think DNA testing across wide swaths of people will end up being a very good thing in time, but even the Ancestry ones won't be of much help to most people because what they *think* they will find out is really not what the results will disclose. Ancestry is either extremely micro (as in, immediate family) or extremely macro (as in, 100,000 years ago your ancestors lived here - pointing to an entire continent.) Not really what people think they will get at all.

    In time these shared databases with computer number-crunching will be really helpful for disease prevention and for diagnostic purposes.

    We're not there yet. Not enough population data has been collected.

    I did a test, just a general ID test because why not? I don't think my insurance company is going to use it against me. My tin foil hat is on someone else's head. If I get a disease, they still have to pay. It is only a problem if/when there are health insurance exclusion clauses (pre-existing conditions exclusions) - which I don't think are legal right now. If I have a marker I may or may not get that illness before I fall off a cliff hiking.

    You touch on my thoughts. I have little issue with a DNA testing company selling my info anonymously for research (if they ask my permission first). I have HUGE issues with all the crap insurance companies pass around to deny medical coverage or rate your policies.