Fitbit Steps

helenback07
helenback07 Posts: 6 Member
Hi everyone!

Long long long time user but first time poster! I have a question about my Fitbit steps. I seem to be burning a considerable amount and I’m worried it isn’t correct. It’s saying I burn about 400 - 500 cals from 8000ish steps. To be fair a lot of it does include many flights of stairs and I do walk at a fast pace but does this seem way off? TIA! :)

Replies

  • margbarco
    margbarco Posts: 128 Member
    I just checked yesterday’s log... it says I burned 504 calories for 12,237 steps. I’m 5’5 female, 145lb.

    So yours seems reasonable, depending on your stats.
  • thisPGHlife
    thisPGHlife Posts: 440 Member
    Do you have your activity level set to sedentary? 8000 steps is more on part with lightly active and depending on what else you do that day may be on the higher end of lightly active/bordering on active.
  • Johnd2000
    Johnd2000 Posts: 198 Member
    That’s broadly in line with what I get. Mind you, if I eat back more than about a 3rd of my Fitbit exercise calories, I gain.
  • DaisyHamilton
    DaisyHamilton Posts: 575 Member
    edited November 2018
    I burn about 300cal per 6000 steps so it's not out of the ordinary. But I get my steps at noon on my lunch break, brisk walking in an average of 85-105 degree Fahrenheit weather. Lately with cooler weather it's been about 250cal/5000 steps in 85-90 degree weather.

    ETA I'm sedentary other than my walks, 5ft4.5in tall, 153lb, 24 year old female.
  • Duck_Puddle
    Duck_Puddle Posts: 3,237 Member
    If you’re set as sedentary in mfp, then that’s probably about right (since 8,000 steps isn’t sedentary).
  • helenback07
    helenback07 Posts: 6 Member
    Awesome thanks everyone for your replies! I do have it set it to sedantary and negative calorie adjustments enabled. Should I change it to lightly active?
  • margbarco
    margbarco Posts: 128 Member
    Awesome thanks everyone for your replies! I do have it set it to sedantary and negative calorie adjustments enabled. Should I change it to lightly active?

    I don’t think that your mfp setting of sedentary or lightly active has any bearing on the amount of calories you get from Fitbit steps. If you walk X amount of steps, they will be translated to Y amount of calories regardless of your activity level.
  • shadow2soul
    shadow2soul Posts: 7,692 Member
    margbarco wrote: »
    Awesome thanks everyone for your replies! I do have it set it to sedantary and negative calorie adjustments enabled. Should I change it to lightly active?

    I don’t think that your mfp setting of sedentary or lightly active has any bearing on the amount of calories you get from Fitbit steps. If you walk X amount of steps, they will be translated to Y amount of calories regardless of your activity level.

    @margbarco - That is not how the Fitbit sync works. It's a comparison of calories burned and actually has nothing to do with the step count at all. For this reason increasing the activity level would give the OP a higher base goal and a smaller adjustment for the same activity.
  • shadow2soul
    shadow2soul Posts: 7,692 Member
    edited November 2018
    Hi everyone!

    Long long long time user but first time poster! I have a question about my Fitbit steps. I seem to be burning a considerable amount and I’m worried it isn’t correct. It’s saying I burn about 400 - 500 cals from 8000ish steps. To be fair a lot of it does include many flights of stairs and I do walk at a fast pace but does this seem way off? TIA! :)

    Your Fitbit adjustment actually has nothing to do with your step count. It's a comparison of what MFP thought you would burn and what Fitbit detected your burn to be based on your activity.

    I got 400 calories for 8000 steps yesterday and I am set to Lightly active. However, I do workouts that don't necessarily add tons of steps, but will still increase my calorie burn for the day. I also eat 100% of the calories I get from my Fitbit adjustments and will lose, maintain, or gain as expected. I am very careful with my food log though weighing 90% of what I eat and trying to get the accurate entries from the database (there is a lot of inaccurate stuff hiding in there and some of it even has the green verified check mark).


    Now not everyone can eat 100% of the adjustment, because Fitbit isn't 100% accurate on the calorie burn for everyone. Things like the accuracy of your food log can affect your percieved accuracy of the calorie burn. Then if you have a model with the HRM and it's detecting an elevated HR all the time that could inflate your reported calorie burn above what you are actually burning.


    The improtant thing is to evaluate your results over time. Say you eat 50% of them for 4-6 weeks and then evaluate. Did you lose faster than you were aiming too? Than you can eat more than 50% of them. Did you lose less, maintain, or gain? Than you should eat less than 50% and I would also advise evalutating the accuracy of what you are logging.

    Awesome thanks everyone for your replies! I do have it set it to sedantary and negative calorie adjustments enabled. Should I change it to lightly active?

    All that will do is increase your base goal a bit and decrease the adjustment (might take a few minutes to take effect). It will still be telling you to eat the same amount.

    For example:

    At Sedentary MFP estimates I burn about 1700.
    At Lightly Active MFP estimates I burn about 1900.

    Yesterday Fitbit reported my calorie burn to be 2300.

    2300 - 1700 = 600 adjustment at Sedentary
    2300 - 1900 = 400 adjustment at Lightly Active

    So if I selected 1 lb per week loss it would look like:

    Sedentary: 1200 + 600 exercise = 1800 (1200 NET)
    Lightly Active: 1400 + 400 exercise = 1800 (1400 NET)
  • margbarco
    margbarco Posts: 128 Member
    edited November 2018
    margbarco wrote: »
    Awesome thanks everyone for your replies! I do have it set it to sedantary and negative calorie adjustments enabled. Should I change it to lightly active?

    I don’t think that your mfp setting of sedentary or lightly active has any bearing on the amount of calories you get from Fitbit steps. If you walk X amount of steps, they will be translated to Y amount of calories regardless of your activity level.

    @margbarco - That is not how the Fitbit sync works. It's a comparison of calories burned and actually has nothing to do with the step count at all. For this reason increasing the activity level would give the OP a higher base goal and a smaller adjustment for the same activity.

    @shadow2soul Ok, I’m confused. I’m obviously missing something fundamental. Could you please explain? If mfp doesn’t use the step count to assign exercise calories then why even sync steps...? I’m asking in earnest, not trying to be daft. Thank you!

    ETA: Just saw your next post to OP....
  • amy19355
    amy19355 Posts: 805 Member
    edited November 2018
    Fwiw - while seated in my chair at home, my Fitbit (Alta HR) counts wide arm swings as steps.

    This discovery has caused me to mentally adjust down any Fitbit step counts; i am sure not taking them to the bank as gold!

    That said, hitting 10,000 steps in a day (real or including arm swings) is undeniably good for my personal overall fitness program.

    I find *more meaningful* to my personal tracking the the fitbit graphs on: hours of the day with 250 steps or more; the minutes of activity and the sleep patterns.

    I use MFP for food logging to watch calories and macros and weight loss progress.
  • helenback07
    helenback07 Posts: 6 Member
    Thanks again everyone for your insight. I eat back 70 - 90% of my exercise/walking cals and have been consistently losing but im getting to the lower end of my goal now and I know thats when you have to tighten the boot straps a bit so didn't want to be let down by fitbit overestimating my calorie burn from general activity. However, I trust it quite a lot when it comes to actual exercise. I will keep an eye on it and maybe eat a bit less back if I find im not going in the right direction. Thanks again - much appreciated!
This discussion has been closed.