What am I doing wrong?
Options
Replies
-
jamiekidby wrote: »jamiekidby wrote: »RunnerGrl1982 wrote: »Do you have a food scale and weighing all your food?
I do have a food scale. When I am following "The Zone" which tends to work well for me, I do weigh and measure all of my food. It's just a lot of work and I am not sure I can make that committment to food prep right now. I figured tracking my calories would be sufficient. Does weighing the food that you are tracking calories with make a difference somehow?
Ahhh, food scales and eggs. How upset I was to find out how much those freakin’ eggs could vary. And it was rarely under one serving of “egg.” My record was one egg equaling 3.6 servings of egg.
Weigh ALL solid foods, including pre-packaged ones like yogurt and frozen meals and things that seem to be in their own packaging like eggs, slices of bread, and pieces of cheese. If your calorie goal is set correctly, you really don’t have a lot of wiggle room.
Really?! I guess weighing will be very eye opening!
I know this. My typical breakfast is a cup of seedless grapes, topped by a 6oz container of Greek yogurt and 1 bar out a 2-bar envelope of Nature Valley granola bars (calories vary by flavor). Initially, I was logging the cup of grapes using the database entry: Grapes - Raw, 1 cup which valued them at 62 calories. Then one day, I tared my bowl on the scale, measured out my cup of grapes, and tossed them into the bowl. And got something rather like today's entry: Grapes - Raw, 176 g valued at 118 calories, i.e. just under DOUBLE the measuring cup value. And those were grapes. Now 60-odd calories aren't making any kind of difference. But if I mess up on the grapes and I mess up on the mashed potatoes and I mess up on the peanut butter, it's totally possible for me to accidentally wipe out my deficit.
11 -
estherdragonbat wrote: »jamiekidby wrote: »jamiekidby wrote: »RunnerGrl1982 wrote: »Do you have a food scale and weighing all your food?
I do have a food scale. When I am following "The Zone" which tends to work well for me, I do weigh and measure all of my food. It's just a lot of work and I am not sure I can make that committment to food prep right now. I figured tracking my calories would be sufficient. Does weighing the food that you are tracking calories with make a difference somehow?
Ahhh, food scales and eggs. How upset I was to find out how much those freakin’ eggs could vary. And it was rarely under one serving of “egg.” My record was one egg equaling 3.6 servings of egg.
Weigh ALL solid foods, including pre-packaged ones like yogurt and frozen meals and things that seem to be in their own packaging like eggs, slices of bread, and pieces of cheese. If your calorie goal is set correctly, you really don’t have a lot of wiggle room.
Really?! I guess weighing will be very eye opening!
I know this. My typical breakfast is a cup of seedless grapes, topped by a 6oz container of Greek yogurt and 1 bar out a 2-bar envelope of Nature Valley granola bars (calories vary by flavor). Initially, I was logging the cup of grapes using the database entry: Grapes - Raw, 1 cup which valued them at 62 calories. Then one day, I tared my bowl on the scale, measured out my cup of grapes, and tossed them into the bowl. And got something rather like today's entry: Grapes - Raw, 176 g valued at 118 calories, i.e. just under DOUBLE the measuring cup value. And those were grapes. Now 60-odd calories aren't making any kind of difference. But if I mess up on the grapes and I mess up on the mashed potatoes and I mess up on the peanut butter, it's totally possible for me to accidentally wipe out my deficit.
I'm a little scared!4 -
jamiekidby wrote: »estherdragonbat wrote: »jamiekidby wrote: »jamiekidby wrote: »RunnerGrl1982 wrote: »Do you have a food scale and weighing all your food?
I do have a food scale. When I am following "The Zone" which tends to work well for me, I do weigh and measure all of my food. It's just a lot of work and I am not sure I can make that committment to food prep right now. I figured tracking my calories would be sufficient. Does weighing the food that you are tracking calories with make a difference somehow?
Ahhh, food scales and eggs. How upset I was to find out how much those freakin’ eggs could vary. And it was rarely under one serving of “egg.” My record was one egg equaling 3.6 servings of egg.
Weigh ALL solid foods, including pre-packaged ones like yogurt and frozen meals and things that seem to be in their own packaging like eggs, slices of bread, and pieces of cheese. If your calorie goal is set correctly, you really don’t have a lot of wiggle room.
Really?! I guess weighing will be very eye opening!
I know this. My typical breakfast is a cup of seedless grapes, topped by a 6oz container of Greek yogurt and 1 bar out a 2-bar envelope of Nature Valley granola bars (calories vary by flavor). Initially, I was logging the cup of grapes using the database entry: Grapes - Raw, 1 cup which valued them at 62 calories. Then one day, I tared my bowl on the scale, measured out my cup of grapes, and tossed them into the bowl. And got something rather like today's entry: Grapes - Raw, 176 g valued at 118 calories, i.e. just under DOUBLE the measuring cup value. And those were grapes. Now 60-odd calories aren't making any kind of difference. But if I mess up on the grapes and I mess up on the mashed potatoes and I mess up on the peanut butter, it's totally possible for me to accidentally wipe out my deficit.
I'm a little scared!
Don't be scared. Having knowledge is power and gives you more control over your journey.8 -
I agree on the use of a digital scale. You could easily wipe out a deficit by having inaccurate logs throughout the day. I also think that 1300 is way too low for you. As you cut calories, your metabolic rate lowers and can adapt. If you start a cut at 1300, you don’t have much wiggle room once you hit a platue.
11 -
I agree on the use of a digital scale. You could easily wipe out a deficit by having inaccurate logs throughout the day. I also think that 1300 is way too low for you. As you cut calories, your metabolic rate lowers and can adapt. If you start a cut at 1300, you don’t have much wiggle room once you hit a platue.
Your metabolic rate doesn't lower as a result of lower calories, it lowers as a result of losing weight.12 -
jamiekidby wrote: »estherdragonbat wrote: »jamiekidby wrote: »jamiekidby wrote: »RunnerGrl1982 wrote: »Do you have a food scale and weighing all your food?
I do have a food scale. When I am following "The Zone" which tends to work well for me, I do weigh and measure all of my food. It's just a lot of work and I am not sure I can make that committment to food prep right now. I figured tracking my calories would be sufficient. Does weighing the food that you are tracking calories with make a difference somehow?
Ahhh, food scales and eggs. How upset I was to find out how much those freakin’ eggs could vary. And it was rarely under one serving of “egg.” My record was one egg equaling 3.6 servings of egg.
Weigh ALL solid foods, including pre-packaged ones like yogurt and frozen meals and things that seem to be in their own packaging like eggs, slices of bread, and pieces of cheese. If your calorie goal is set correctly, you really don’t have a lot of wiggle room.
Really?! I guess weighing will be very eye opening!
I know this. My typical breakfast is a cup of seedless grapes, topped by a 6oz container of Greek yogurt and 1 bar out a 2-bar envelope of Nature Valley granola bars (calories vary by flavor). Initially, I was logging the cup of grapes using the database entry: Grapes - Raw, 1 cup which valued them at 62 calories. Then one day, I tared my bowl on the scale, measured out my cup of grapes, and tossed them into the bowl. And got something rather like today's entry: Grapes - Raw, 176 g valued at 118 calories, i.e. just under DOUBLE the measuring cup value. And those were grapes. Now 60-odd calories aren't making any kind of difference. But if I mess up on the grapes and I mess up on the mashed potatoes and I mess up on the peanut butter, it's totally possible for me to accidentally wipe out my deficit.
I'm a little scared!
yeah you will be surprised and also packaged food can be off by up to 20% PER SERVING!. you will be shocked when you weigh everything(solids/semi solids in grams) only use measuring cups/spoons for liquids .It was an eye opener for me too when I came here and was told to weigh EVERYTHING. I am still shocked some days what something can weigh vs eyeballing it.0 -
Teabythesea_ wrote: »I agree on the use of a digital scale. You could easily wipe out a deficit by having inaccurate logs throughout the day. I also think that 1300 is way too low for you. As you cut calories, your metabolic rate lowers and can adapt. If you start a cut at 1300, you don’t have much wiggle room once you hit a platue.
Your metabolic rate doesn't lower as a result of lower calories, it lowers as a result of losing weight.
Adaptive thermogenesis does occur in a prolonged calorie restriction.6 -
Teabythesea_ wrote: »I agree on the use of a digital scale. You could easily wipe out a deficit by having inaccurate logs throughout the day. I also think that 1300 is way too low for you. As you cut calories, your metabolic rate lowers and can adapt. If you start a cut at 1300, you don’t have much wiggle room once you hit a platue.
Your metabolic rate doesn't lower as a result of lower calories, it lowers as a result of losing weight.
Adaptive thermogenesis does occur in a prolonged calorie restriction.
Yes, because the calorie restriction causes you to lose weight.5 -
Adaptive thermogenesis, explained by a well-researched thread here from a PhD.
https://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/1077746/starvation-mode-adaptive-thermogenesis-and-weight-loss/p110 -
I think you are doing great! Keep it up! Add in the food scale and look into tracking your macros also and you probably need to eat a few more calories. If you are too restrictive it could steal your weight. Remember carbs, protein and fat are all processed differently in the body. Look into adjusting your daily intake.
https://www.iifym.com/macro-calculator/
Good luck!12 -
jamiekidby wrote: »RunnerGrl1982 wrote: »Do you have a food scale and weighing all your food?
I do have a food scale. When I am following "The Zone" which tends to work well for me, I do weigh and measure all of my food. It's just a lot of work and I am not sure I can make that committment to food prep right now. I figured tracking my calories would be sufficient. Does weighing the food that you are tracking calories with make a difference somehow?
Ahhh, food scales and eggs. How upset I was to find out how much those freakin’ eggs could vary. And it was rarely under one serving of “egg.” My record was one egg equaling 3.6 servings of egg.
Weigh ALL solid foods, including pre-packaged ones like yogurt and frozen meals and things that seem to be in their own packaging like eggs, slices of bread, and pieces of cheese. If your calorie goal is set correctly, you really don’t have a lot of wiggle room.
Go figure; eggs are one of the (very few) items I *don’t* typically weigh. Now I’m a little afraid to... 😆1 -
ChrysalisCove wrote: »jamiekidby wrote: »RunnerGrl1982 wrote: »Do you have a food scale and weighing all your food?
I do have a food scale. When I am following "The Zone" which tends to work well for me, I do weigh and measure all of my food. It's just a lot of work and I am not sure I can make that committment to food prep right now. I figured tracking my calories would be sufficient. Does weighing the food that you are tracking calories with make a difference somehow?
Ahhh, food scales and eggs. How upset I was to find out how much those freakin’ eggs could vary. And it was rarely under one serving of “egg.” My record was one egg equaling 3.6 servings of egg.
Weigh ALL solid foods, including pre-packaged ones like yogurt and frozen meals and things that seem to be in their own packaging like eggs, slices of bread, and pieces of cheese. If your calorie goal is set correctly, you really don’t have a lot of wiggle room.
Go figure; eggs are one of the (very few) items I *don’t* typically weigh. Now I’m a little afraid to... 😆
Me too, I love fried egg and beans on toast as an alternative fry up and have been taking the usda medium egg value when I log, I never thought about weighing them - ooops0 -
I'm about the same weight as you (was 213 January 1st and down to 198 today) and though I don't count calories, I count macros I'm eating about 1350 calories a day and work out about an hour a day. I think you will find weighing everything is key. Also you said your getting most of your protein from eggs. If your eating whole eggs and not weighing them, they can have drastically different weights. Also consider each egg has about 5-6 grams of fat. The weighing has really helped me because packaging serving sizes are off a lot. For example the other day I was weighing out Trader Joes Asparagus and the serving size said 84 grams (about 7 pieces). 84 grams was actually about 12 pieces so in this instance I was able to eat a little more.0
-
Jackie9003 wrote: »ChrysalisCove wrote: »jamiekidby wrote: »RunnerGrl1982 wrote: »Do you have a food scale and weighing all your food?
I do have a food scale. When I am following "The Zone" which tends to work well for me, I do weigh and measure all of my food. It's just a lot of work and I am not sure I can make that committment to food prep right now. I figured tracking my calories would be sufficient. Does weighing the food that you are tracking calories with make a difference somehow?
Ahhh, food scales and eggs. How upset I was to find out how much those freakin’ eggs could vary. And it was rarely under one serving of “egg.” My record was one egg equaling 3.6 servings of egg.
Weigh ALL solid foods, including pre-packaged ones like yogurt and frozen meals and things that seem to be in their own packaging like eggs, slices of bread, and pieces of cheese. If your calorie goal is set correctly, you really don’t have a lot of wiggle room.
Go figure; eggs are one of the (very few) items I *don’t* typically weigh. Now I’m a little afraid to... 😆
Me too, I love fried egg and beans on toast as an alternative fry up and have been taking the usda medium egg value when I log, I never thought about weighing them - ooops
yep my large eggs say 50g on the package one was 54g the other was 55 so 109g for 2 eggs. maybe not a lot of calories there but they all add up1 -
ChrysalisCove wrote: »jamiekidby wrote: »RunnerGrl1982 wrote: »Do you have a food scale and weighing all your food?
I do have a food scale. When I am following "The Zone" which tends to work well for me, I do weigh and measure all of my food. It's just a lot of work and I am not sure I can make that committment to food prep right now. I figured tracking my calories would be sufficient. Does weighing the food that you are tracking calories with make a difference somehow?
Ahhh, food scales and eggs. How upset I was to find out how much those freakin’ eggs could vary. And it was rarely under one serving of “egg.” My record was one egg equaling 3.6 servings of egg.
Weigh ALL solid foods, including pre-packaged ones like yogurt and frozen meals and things that seem to be in their own packaging like eggs, slices of bread, and pieces of cheese. If your calorie goal is set correctly, you really don’t have a lot of wiggle room.
Go figure; eggs are one of the (very few) items I *don’t* typically weigh. Now I’m a little afraid to... 😆
That one was a double yolk! But truthfully, most were at least 1.33 servings of egg.0 -
CharlieBeansmomTracey wrote: »Jackie9003 wrote: »ChrysalisCove wrote: »jamiekidby wrote: »RunnerGrl1982 wrote: »Do you have a food scale and weighing all your food?
I do have a food scale. When I am following "The Zone" which tends to work well for me, I do weigh and measure all of my food. It's just a lot of work and I am not sure I can make that committment to food prep right now. I figured tracking my calories would be sufficient. Does weighing the food that you are tracking calories with make a difference somehow?
Ahhh, food scales and eggs. How upset I was to find out how much those freakin’ eggs could vary. And it was rarely under one serving of “egg.” My record was one egg equaling 3.6 servings of egg.
Weigh ALL solid foods, including pre-packaged ones like yogurt and frozen meals and things that seem to be in their own packaging like eggs, slices of bread, and pieces of cheese. If your calorie goal is set correctly, you really don’t have a lot of wiggle room.
Go figure; eggs are one of the (very few) items I *don’t* typically weigh. Now I’m a little afraid to... 😆
Me too, I love fried egg and beans on toast as an alternative fry up and have been taking the usda medium egg value when I log, I never thought about weighing them - ooops
yep my large eggs say 50g on the package one was 54g the other was 55 so 109g for 2 eggs. maybe not a lot of calories there but they all add up
I started weighing eggs when I was getting them from a farm stand and the sizes were visibly different. I'm back to supermarket eggs now, and weighing them, and there is a surprising amount of variety within a dozen supermarket eggs as well.1 -
kshama2001 wrote: »CharlieBeansmomTracey wrote: »Jackie9003 wrote: »ChrysalisCove wrote: »jamiekidby wrote: »RunnerGrl1982 wrote: »Do you have a food scale and weighing all your food?
I do have a food scale. When I am following "The Zone" which tends to work well for me, I do weigh and measure all of my food. It's just a lot of work and I am not sure I can make that committment to food prep right now. I figured tracking my calories would be sufficient. Does weighing the food that you are tracking calories with make a difference somehow?
Ahhh, food scales and eggs. How upset I was to find out how much those freakin’ eggs could vary. And it was rarely under one serving of “egg.” My record was one egg equaling 3.6 servings of egg.
Weigh ALL solid foods, including pre-packaged ones like yogurt and frozen meals and things that seem to be in their own packaging like eggs, slices of bread, and pieces of cheese. If your calorie goal is set correctly, you really don’t have a lot of wiggle room.
Go figure; eggs are one of the (very few) items I *don’t* typically weigh. Now I’m a little afraid to... 😆
Me too, I love fried egg and beans on toast as an alternative fry up and have been taking the usda medium egg value when I log, I never thought about weighing them - ooops
yep my large eggs say 50g on the package one was 54g the other was 55 so 109g for 2 eggs. maybe not a lot of calories there but they all add up
I started weighing eggs when I was getting them from a farm stand and the sizes were visibly different. I'm back to supermarket eggs now, and weighing them, and there is a surprising amount of variety within a dozen supermarket eggs as well.
I agree you wouldnt think there would be such a big difference in store eggs.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.5K Getting Started
- 259.7K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.6K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 393 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.7K Motivation and Support
- 7.8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.3K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 934 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.3K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions