Info needed
Bionicscotty74
Posts: 8 Member
Has anybody heard about the metabolic confusion diet?
12
Replies
-
Yes. It's bunk. Don't do it. You can't confuse your metabolism.16
-
MichelleSilverleaf wrote: »Yes. It's bunk. Don't do it. You can't confuse your metabolism.
I'm not so sure about that. I just ate a chocolate covered jalapeno pepper.15 -
Fatty_Nuff wrote: »MichelleSilverleaf wrote: »Yes. It's bunk. Don't do it. You can't confuse your metabolism.
I'm not so sure about that. I just ate a chocolate covered jalapeno pepper.
Confusing your digestive tract is not the same thing.12 -
My quick search popped up with Dr. Oz as the second link. Take it for what it’s worth but anything that sounds bizarre just avoid. Weight loss is already confusing enough for most.5
-
My quick search popped up with Dr. Oz as the second link. Take it for what it’s worth but anything that sounds bizarre just avoid. Weight loss is already confusing enough for most.
If Oz is attached to it, you can safely put the advice in the trash bin. You can't confuse your metabolism. It doesn't think, so...9 -
snickerscharlie wrote: »If Oz is attached to it, you can safely put the advice in the trash bin. You can't confuse your metabolism. It doesn't think, so...
To be fair, there are some diets that have legitimate origins when they were used for medical purposes, like the keto diet and the gluten free diet, that Dr. Oz jumped on when they started getting faddish. So while my opinion of him ain't high, his support of a diet doesn't ALWAYS mean it's a bunch of BS. If 'metabolic confusion' diet is another word for calorie cycling (I think it's the same dietary strategy, but I'm not really sure), then I've seen a little research that suggests there might be positives for calorie cycling, anyway. (like this one: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4018593/https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4018593/ )
But I'd absolutely agree that finding a legitimate source for what a diet is all about would be more important after hearing a Dr. Oz rec.3 -
snickerscharlie wrote: »If Oz is attached to it, you can safely put the advice in the trash bin. You can't confuse your metabolism. It doesn't think, so...
To be fair, there are some diets that have legitimate origins when they were used for medical purposes, like the keto diet and the gluten free diet, that Dr. Oz jumped on when they started getting faddish. So while my opinion of him ain't high, his support of a diet doesn't ALWAYS mean it's a bunch of BS. If 'metabolic confusion' diet is another word for calorie cycling (I think it's the same dietary strategy, but I'm not really sure), then I've seen a little research that suggests there might be positives for calorie cycling, anyway. (like this one: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4018593/https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4018593/ )
But I'd absolutely agree that finding a legitimate source for what a diet is all about would be more important after hearing a Dr. Oz rec.
I don't disagree with this.
What I do disagree with is all of a sudden (thanks in no small part to Oz) people are going gluten free who aren't celiacs or even gluten intolerant (but like to say/think they are because they watched his show) or keto because it's the diet-du-jour. The very specific medical reasons for doing either of these have been lost in the shuffle because some of the sketchy benefits for doing them without medical cause have been vastly overstated and/or completely fabricated.
6 -
snickerscharlie wrote: »If Oz is attached to it, you can safely put the advice in the trash bin. You can't confuse your metabolism. It doesn't think, so...
To be fair, there are some diets that have legitimate origins when they were used for medical purposes, like the keto diet and the gluten free diet, that Dr. Oz jumped on when they started getting faddish. So while my opinion of him ain't high, his support of a diet doesn't ALWAYS mean it's a bunch of BS. If 'metabolic confusion' diet is another word for calorie cycling (I think it's the same dietary strategy, but I'm not really sure), then I've seen a little research that suggests there might be positives for calorie cycling, anyway. (like this one: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4018593/https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4018593/ )
But I'd absolutely agree that finding a legitimate source for what a diet is all about would be more important after hearing a Dr. Oz rec.
A blind squirrel will find a nut sometimes.
When you throw out all the fad diets ever created, some will stick. That does not mean you should subscribe to everything he says.
He's a whack job.6 -
Oz has about as much credibility as his Wizard counterpart did.5
-
snickerscharlie wrote: »Oz has about as much credibility as his Wizard counterpart did.
Less. The Wizard started out as a (relatively-harmless) fraud, but eventually returns to Oz and learns real magic from Glinda.1 -
For those that don't know what it is, here is a link:
http://calorieshiftingguide.com/the-17-day-diets-metabolic-confusion-diet-how-it-really-works/
And as far as I got reading it (not very far), it's basically nonsense. Eating in particular patterns or specific types of food do not increase your metabolism as is claimed.2 -
For those that don't know what it is, here is a link:
http://calorieshiftingguide.com/the-17-day-diets-metabolic-confusion-diet-how-it-really-works/
And as far as I got reading it (not very far), it's basically nonsense. Eating in particular patterns or specific types of food do not increase your metabolism as is claimed.
Oh, good grief. What a crock!
OP, why make things complicated? Basic weight loss is simple (if not always easy): Eat less than you burn. You can eat the foods you like, though it's important for health to get good nutrition, and you may have to make some tradeoffs (eating different foods you still enjoy) to feel more full more of the time. Eat on whatever schedule works best for you personally. This kind of approach has worked very successfully for many who've already replied on this thread.
Complicated named diets just make people feel extra-special (none of your friends will be impressed by the "eat less" diet) and often cost money (for special supplements or foods, if not the diet plan itself), and create unnecessary upheaval in your life.
The point of all this is to get to a healthy weight, then stay there long term. Most of us couldn't continue most of the tricksy diets forever, so why waste the learning process while losing?
Here's the actual magic formula:
Appropriate calories for weight management + well-rounded, balanced eating of foods you enjoy for nutrition (including some treats) + fun exercise for fitness = best odds of continuing long-term good health
And continuing long-term good health is what most of us want, right?
As an alternative, here's a straightforward plan that works (it's how I lost 50 pounds in less than a year, and have stayed at a healthy weight for nearly 3 years since):
http://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/10636388/free-customized-personal-weight-loss-eating-plan-not-spam-or-mlm/
Best wishes!
3
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions