Please tell me if this is right

jenniferanderson3888
jenniferanderson3888 Posts: 53 Member
edited December 19 in Fitness and Exercise
I read the internet and MFP and it says I burn 388 calories for 30 minutes of elliptical machine. Fit bit says I only burn 186 calories in 30 minutes. Which is accurate. I research the internet and it says 388 too. I’m 5 foot 190 pounds.

Replies

  • MikePTY
    MikePTY Posts: 3,814 Member
    I would use your fitbit reading. While fitbit/personal trackers can have accuracy issues too, they are at least somewhat more personalized and accurate than your general exercise calorie estimator on the internet.
  • TravisJHunt
    TravisJHunt Posts: 533 Member
    Depends on how hard you're going at it as well. You can use an elliptical and barely have it moving or you can be pushing at hyper speed and burning tons of cals. Don't most also track distance? Time is great but it doesn't show you effort, whereas you can't really cheat distance as much.
  • pinuplove
    pinuplove Posts: 12,871 Member
    388 is way too high. 186 is closer but I'd say still on the high side.
  • Phirrgus
    Phirrgus Posts: 1,894 Member
    Agreed with the above.
  • cmriverside
    cmriverside Posts: 34,454 Member
    I agree with pinup. Use the lower number, but even it sounds too high.
  • shira324
    shira324 Posts: 156 Member
    Does your fitbit have a heart rate monitor built in? If so, I would definitely trust that more than an estimate from the internet. 388 sounds way too high.
  • TanyaHooton
    TanyaHooton Posts: 249 Member
    338 calories sound like what you'd burn in an hour, not 30 minutes. What was your distance? What speed were you going? For example, I'm 5'6" and 142 lbs, and the elliptical machine estimates 216 calories for approximately 35 minutes. I average an 11 to 11:30 minute mile. I run until I hit 5K, which takes as long as it takes (right now around 35 minutes). So the 188 sounds much closer to accurate, depending on your speed and distance.
  • AnnPT77
    AnnPT77 Posts: 34,600 Member
    Faced with competing exercise calorie estimates, and absent persuasive reasons to believe otherwise, I would alway choose to log the lower estimate . . . and eat it back.
  • StephSuter2508
    StephSuter2508 Posts: 31 Member
    Trust your fitbit, my fitbit is always lower than the machines estimate, but its based on my heart rate. I noticed that the same class I do every Tuesday, 4 weeks ago I used to burn 480 calories for the hour, this week my fitbit showed only 380 calories because my heart rate has dropped and it takes less effort to do the same class as I am now fitter.

    When I enter 60mins of body pump (the class I do) into MFP it says I burn 670 calories for the hour, significantly more than my fitbit says,

    As I am trying to lose 40lbs I always go for the lower figure, to be safe
  • AnnPT77
    AnnPT77 Posts: 34,600 Member
    edited February 2019
    Trust your fitbit, my fitbit is always lower than the machines estimate, but its based on my heart rate. I noticed that the same class I do every Tuesday, 4 weeks ago I used to burn 480 calories for the hour, this week my fitbit showed only 380 calories because my heart rate has dropped and it takes less effort to do the same class as I am now fitter.

    When I enter 60mins of body pump (the class I do) into MFP it says I burn 670 calories for the hour, significantly more than my fitbit says,

    As I am trying to lose 40lbs I always go for the lower figure, to be safe

    Good news: You don't burn fewer calories doing the same exercise, as you get fitter. That's a commonly-believed myth, and one of the reasons people believe it is that, sadly, heart rate is not really a reliable measure of calorie burn, so heart rate monitors (or trackers that use them) mislead. The devices estimate calories, they don't measure them.

    As one loses weight, one will burn slightly fewer calories doing the same the exercise, if the exercise is one that involves a lot of moving one's body through space under direct muscle power (like Zumba or walking/running, say).

    At the same body weight, the same exercise (same duration, pace) will burn roughly the same number of calories, irrespective of fitness. It's just physics.

    Being fitter makes it feel easier, that's all. Adaptation to exercise (making any given exercise feel and actually be easier) is what fitness is about. It doesn't change the physics.

    What we don't know is whether - in your case - the 380 was a more accurate estimate, or the 480. It depends on whether fitter or less-fit you is closer to the fitness of the subjects on which the underlying research was based.

    This is an old, but still very good, essay written by an MFP-member fitness professional, explaining why and how heart rate monitors are not completely reliable for estimating exercise calories: https://www.myfitnesspal.com/blog/Azdak/view/the-real-facts-about-hrms-and-calories-what-you-need-to-know-before-purchasing-an-hrm-or-using-one-21472
  • Phirrgus
    Phirrgus Posts: 1,894 Member
    That blog is gold - and it just showed me exactly how I'm going to use my device.

  • jasonpoihegatama
    jasonpoihegatama Posts: 496 Member
    I read the internet and MFP and it says I burn 388 calories for 30 minutes of elliptical machine. Fit bit says I only burn 186 calories in 30 minutes. Which is accurate. I research the internet and it says 388 too. I’m 5 foot 190 pounds.

    Did it say what level or speed you should be doing to lose the 388 calories in 30 minutes?
This discussion has been closed.