Body fat estimation (pics)
BaguetteChaude
Posts: 25 Member
Hello everyone
I don't have access to a dexa scan so I can't rely on accuracy
I have an impedance scale that measures me at 26% body fat (I only use this feature to see the trend of body fat going down as I know it's not accurate)
The pics I found to eyeball the bf on a woman seem really weird to me and I can't figure out on what range I am now. I still see myself at 167lb
Could you give me you opinion based on those pics? Does 26% seem possible to you?
Thank you
I don't have access to a dexa scan so I can't rely on accuracy
I have an impedance scale that measures me at 26% body fat (I only use this feature to see the trend of body fat going down as I know it's not accurate)
The pics I found to eyeball the bf on a woman seem really weird to me and I can't figure out on what range I am now. I still see myself at 167lb
Could you give me you opinion based on those pics? Does 26% seem possible to you?
Thank you
4
Replies
-
25-26% looks about right to me.3
-
I would have guessed slightly lower, 23-24%3
-
I would agree with mid-20s. Whatever it is you look great.7
-
Thank all of you for your answers
@sardelsa thank you ! Only 3lb to my vanity weight feels like i finally see the light lol4 -
First of all, I have a tremendous amount of respect for anyone who is willing to put their body out in public for evaluation. That is brave. (And yes, you look great).
I agree with those who say that your appearance and your scale readings are in the same ballpark. Whether it's 23% or 24% or 26% is irrelevant--that's as close as that technology is going to get, so those differences are meaningless.
6 -
First of all, I have a tremendous amount of respect for anyone who is willing to put their body out in public for evaluation. That is brave. (And yes, you look great).
I agree with those who say that your appearance and your scale readings are in the same ballpark. Whether it's 23% or 24% or 26% is irrelevant--that's as close as that technology is going to get, so those differences are meaningless.
Agree ^ I'd also say 23-26%.5 -
First of all, I have a tremendous amount of respect for anyone who is willing to put their body out in public for evaluation. That is brave.
I have to admit that I thought about it for a few hours before posting because I wouldn't normally post a pic of myself like that. But I don't trust my eyes and wanted a feedback soo.... Haha2 -
You look amazing!
I agree with the 23-26% range. If it's any consolation, you're never going to get an exact reading from a DEXA scan either beyond this type of margin of error, so visual estimations and tape measure estimations are good enough.3 -
Try myshape.fitness (google it) - you can enter just a few measurements and it will calculate your body fat % (and track your body shape with a 3D avatar). Great for monitoring trends like you said.2
-
Keep up the good work focus on your goal and succeed.1
-
I would have guessed 23% or so. You look good.2
-
You're looking awesome!2
-
I thought 23%. No matter what the numbers say, you look beautiful.4
-
Wow! You look great - I'm definitely higher than you. Feel free to add me and check out the pics I posted and give me your best guesses, too!0
-
Ditto the low 20s1
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.7K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 176K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8.1K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 1.2K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions