Welcome to Debate Club! Please be aware that this is a space for respectful debate, and that your ideas will be challenged here. Please remember to critique the argument, not the author.
Caster Semenya :thoughts?
comptonelizabeth
Posts: 1,701 Member
in Debate Club
I've been following this with interest and would love to hear other people's views
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/athletics/48102479
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/athletics/48102479
0
Replies
-
I think its insane. I don't have the mental energy to contribute much to be honest, it just frustrates me.1
-
kathryn1391 wrote: »I think its insane. I don't have the mental energy to contribute much to be honest, it just frustrates me.
I know what you mean! I seem to switch back and forth with my thoughts but think it's pretty outrageous that in order to continue competing as a woman, she'll have to take medication!0 -
comptonelizabeth wrote: »kathryn1391 wrote: »I think its insane. I don't have the mental energy to contribute much to be honest, it just frustrates me.
I know what you mean! I seem to switch back and forth with my thoughts but think it's pretty outrageous that in order to continue competing as a woman, she'll have to take medication!
That's just it. Its her body, her hormones, how can you actually say that to compete, the amount of hormones she naturally creates needs to be adjusted? Its like saying to a pro footballer that their natural ability to focus is unfair on others so wear an eye patch.1 -
Do women athletes who have naturally low levels of hormones get to supplement in order to compete 'equally'?2
-
I think one of the issues is that chromosonally, she is XY and therefore male, even though she was raised as, and identifies as, female. Which opens a whole new can of worms. I can understand that other women competing may feel she has an unfair advantage but as you point out, so do others - eg if you're lucky enough to have long legs, that gives you an advantage in long jump.1
-
-
I think i'm not on any side of this issue. I feel REALLY bad for her! I have since she was thrown into the spotlight a few years ago. One one hand, she cannot help the way she was born. On the other hand, does having too much testosterone give her an unfair advantage over the athletes she competes against? It's just awful that her personal business was publicized.3
-
comptonelizabeth wrote: »I think one of the issues is that chromosonally, she is XY and therefore male, even though she was raised as, and identifies as, female. Which opens a whole new can of worms. I can understand that other women competing may feel she has an unfair advantage but as you point out, so do others - eg if you're lucky enough to have long legs, that gives you an advantage in long jump.
I don't believe the results of Caster's sex verification test were ever released?0 -
comptonelizabeth wrote: »I think one of the issues is that chromosonally, she is XY and therefore male, even though she was raised as, and identifies as, female. Which opens a whole new can of worms. I can understand that other women competing may feel she has an unfair advantage but as you point out, so do others - eg if you're lucky enough to have long legs, that gives you an advantage in long jump.
I don't believe the results of Caster's sex verification test were ever released?
I'm almost positive you're correct. Yes she's intersex, but chromosomal tests haven't been released from what I understand and I personally don't think they should be for privacy's sake (and because it doesn't matter). I've been following this from the beginning and I'm livid on her behalf and the behalf of everyone who is affected by this.4 -
comptonelizabeth wrote: »I think one of the issues is that chromosonally, she is XY and therefore male, even though she was raised as, and identifies as, female. Which opens a whole new can of worms. I can understand that other women competing may feel she has an unfair advantage but as you point out, so do others - eg if you're lucky enough to have long legs, that gives you an advantage in long jump.
I don't think she is XY - she's intersex, not trans, though there are forms of intersex that involve XY. Given the way trans people are treated for the Olympics, I think if she was XY, she'd have had to be on hormones already to compete. I believe the recommendations in place for trans women in most sports are a testosterone that is actually lower than the average cis woman's, and thus usually much lower than the average cis female athlete.
My general opinion is there might ultimately be no fair way to set requirements for sports. Ultimately, athletes have some level of genetics that are unusual that let them perform at a the professional level. On the other end, there's no ability to have a fair competition if at some level sex (which is partially genetic) is not taken into account - I think few people are going to say fair will to have cis men competing against cis women. Somewhere in between those, the idea of having a category for trans and/or intersex people is just going to encourage othering of them and reducing their opportunities.
Best proposal I've heard so far is to come up with some kind of performance factor that gets assigned to some people based on various criteria.5 -
comptonelizabeth wrote: »I think one of the issues is that chromosonally, she is XY and therefore male, even though she was raised as, and identifies as, female. Which opens a whole new can of worms. I can understand that other women competing may feel she has an unfair advantage but as you point out, so do others - eg if you're lucky enough to have long legs, that gives you an advantage in long jump.
I don't believe the results of Caster's sex verification test were ever released?
I'm almost positive you're correct. Yes she's intersex, but chromosomal tests haven't been released from what I understand and I personally don't think they should be for privacy's sake (and because it doesn't matter). I've been following this from the beginning and I'm livid on her behalf and the behalf of everyone who is affected by this.
I'm not sure where I heard she is XY, apologies as I had the impression this was true.
I suspect some people involved may have their own agenda but I share your outrage!0 -
Dear Posters,
I wanted to offer a brief explanation for closing this topic.
The forum guidelines include this item:
12. Divisive topics work best in groups
I WILL:
• I will use groups to post divisive topics.
• I will be proud of my diversity and respectful of the diversity of our global community.
• I will ask myself if my discussion is relevant only to a particular group, for example, a specific religion or political view, and post that content in an appropriate group.
I WON'T:
• I won’t post divisive topics in the main forums.
• I won’t exclude any groups when posting in the main forums.
• I won’t post politics in the main forums.
If you would like to review the forum guidelines, please visit the following link:
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/welcome/guidelines
At our discretion, this closed discussion may be deleted entirely in the near future.
With respect,
Nova
MyFitnessPal Staff0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions