What should my weekly goal be

tjsims8
tjsims8 Posts: 46 Member
edited December 21 in Health and Weight Loss
I’m currently 170lbs and my goal is 135lbs. What is a reasonable amount to lose a week 1lb or 2lbs?

Replies

  • Danp
    Danp Posts: 1,561 Member
    lorrpb wrote: »
    1lb is reasonable and realistic. Gradually ease yourself into it. 2lbs is more than doable once you've found your groove.

    No, you should only do 2 lb wk if you have more than 75 to lose.

    Exactly!!!

    Your rate of loss you should aim for is determined by the amount of weight you have to lose and has nothing to do with how proficient you are at dieting.

    Granted achieving that appropriate rate of loss will get easier with experience.
  • NovusDies
    NovusDies Posts: 8,940 Member
    1lb is reasonable and realistic. Gradually ease yourself into it. 2lbs is more than doable once you've found your groove.

    How did you come to this terrible conclusion? Do you understand that creating a 1000 calorie deficit that close to goal could actually be quite difficult for the OP?

  • lemurcat2
    lemurcat2 Posts: 7,885 Member
    1 lb
  • PAV8888
    PAV8888 Posts: 14,300 Member
    Danp wrote: »
    To achieve a 2lb/week loss requires a calorie deficit of 7000cal/week or approx 1000cal/day. This is achievable only if you have significant weight to lose as your maintenance would be so high that a 1000cal/day deficit won't take you down into a dangerous, unhealthy and frankly unattainable calorie intake.

    IE:
    6', 300lb, 35yo man has approx 2800cal/day maintenance. Reduce that by 1000cal/day to achieve 2lb/week and he's still consuming a safe and healthy 1800cal/day

    5'4", 155lb 35yo woman has approx 1600cal/day maintenance. Reduce that by 1000cal/day to achieve 2lb/week and she'll be consuming a ridiculously low 600cal/day and yes, can quite literally kill you.

    I don't care how deep or good your 'groove' is that's just terrible advice. Appropriate rate of loss is dictated primarily by the appropriate deficit which is dictated primarily by how much weight the person has too lose.

    It's not about others 'passing on their struggles' and about people 'passing on their incorrect, dangerous, ill informed and potentially harmful advice'.

    Not to nitpick too much; but, even your 300lb example is creating an unhealthy 35.71% deficit, and would be much better off to keep that deficit to 25% or less even when obese (and 20% or less when overweight/normal weight)
  • Danp
    Danp Posts: 1,561 Member
    PAV8888 wrote: »
    Danp wrote: »
    To achieve a 2lb/week loss requires a calorie deficit of 7000cal/week or approx 1000cal/day. This is achievable only if you have significant weight to lose as your maintenance would be so high that a 1000cal/day deficit won't take you down into a dangerous, unhealthy and frankly unattainable calorie intake.

    IE:
    6', 300lb, 35yo man has approx 2800cal/day maintenance. Reduce that by 1000cal/day to achieve 2lb/week and he's still consuming a safe and healthy 1800cal/day

    5'4", 155lb 35yo woman has approx 1600cal/day maintenance. Reduce that by 1000cal/day to achieve 2lb/week and she'll be consuming a ridiculously low 600cal/day and yes, can quite literally kill you.

    I don't care how deep or good your 'groove' is that's just terrible advice. Appropriate rate of loss is dictated primarily by the appropriate deficit which is dictated primarily by how much weight the person has too lose.

    It's not about others 'passing on their struggles' and about people 'passing on their incorrect, dangerous, ill informed and potentially harmful advice'.

    Not to nitpick too much; but, even your 300lb example is creating an unhealthy 35.71% deficit, and would be much better off to keep that deficit to 25% or less even when obese (and 20% or less when overweight/normal weight)

    Point taken. Really just using trying to illustrate the point that safely achieving a 2lb per week loss is a factor of weight to be lost rather than how good you are at exercise/nutrition.
This discussion has been closed.