New Here - Cant figure this out 😌

2»

Replies

  • ceiswyn
    ceiswyn Posts: 2,256 Member
    ceiswyn wrote: »
    It sounds like you and your mother are so used to how people look when they’re overweight, that the normal/healthy weight range looks weird to you. You’re meant to be able to see someone’s bone structure.

    But I can certainly see why getting inside your healthy weight range would be a struggle; at 4’11 you must have a very low calorie requirement! So good luck with at least getting down to 160 :)

    @ceiswyn You are probably right but I dont like too many bones showing. Like my collar bone is when ive hit my limit lol. Mfp says if i want to lose 2lbs a week i need 1300 ish cals but i keep burning it off and it keeps going back up so theres no winning

    What do you mean by this? Do you mean that you're doing a lot of exercise, and if so how are you calculating your calorie burns?

    If you're genuinely eating according to the amount MFP gives you, you should be losing weight, but there are a lot of mistakes people commonly make that can interfere with that; overestimating their exercise, trusting the sizes of packaged goods (a lot of them contain more than they say they do), using bad DB entries, using volume measurements instead of weight, forgetting about cooking oils, that sort of thing.
  • yirara
    yirara Posts: 9,941 Member
    yirara wrote: »
    Do look at your calorie burns for sport again. Given your calorie goal you don't seem to be too heavy. To calculate how much calories you burn walking you use 0.3*weight in lbs*distance walked in miles.
    So for the sake of it I just use 200lbs weight.
    To burn 900kcal walking you'd need to walk 15 miles.
    Torn burn 900kcal when walking and you are 170lbs you'd need to walk 17.6 miles.

    @yirara do multiply it times my weight?

    Yes, 0.3 times "weight in pounds" times "distance in miles"
    Thus for example 0.3 times 170 (pounds) times 5 (miles)
  • saundraxo
    saundraxo Posts: 65 Member
    yirara wrote: »
    yirara wrote: »
    Do look at your calorie burns for sport again. Given your calorie goal you don't seem to be too heavy. To calculate how much calories you burn walking you use 0.3*weight in lbs*distance walked in miles.
    So for the sake of it I just use 200lbs weight.
    To burn 900kcal walking you'd need to walk 15 miles.
    Torn burn 900kcal when walking and you are 170lbs you'd need to walk 17.6 miles.

    @yirara do multiply it times my weight?

    Yes, 0.3 times "weight in pounds" times "distance in miles"
    Thus for example 0.3 times 170 (pounds) times 5 (miles)

    @yirara I did notice I have a distance thing on my treadmill I dont even look at the cals cuz its a foreign treadmill so its like Kg or some crap.
  • Redordeadhead
    Redordeadhead Posts: 1,188 Member
    yirara wrote: »
    yirara wrote: »
    Do look at your calorie burns for sport again. Given your calorie goal you don't seem to be too heavy. To calculate how much calories you burn walking you use 0.3*weight in lbs*distance walked in miles.
    So for the sake of it I just use 200lbs weight.
    To burn 900kcal walking you'd need to walk 15 miles.
    Torn burn 900kcal when walking and you are 170lbs you'd need to walk 17.6 miles.

    @yirara do multiply it times my weight?

    Yes, 0.3 times "weight in pounds" times "distance in miles"
    Thus for example 0.3 times 170 (pounds) times 5 (miles)

    @yirara I did notice I have a distance thing on my treadmill I dont even look at the cals cuz its a foreign treadmill so its like Kg or some crap.

    Could that "crap" be km, kilometres?
    It's a very common unit of measurement.
  • saundraxo
    saundraxo Posts: 65 Member
    yirara wrote: »
    yirara wrote: »
    Do look at your calorie burns for sport again. Given your calorie goal you don't seem to be too heavy. To calculate how much calories you burn walking you use 0.3*weight in lbs*distance walked in miles.
    So for the sake of it I just use 200lbs weight.
    To burn 900kcal walking you'd need to walk 15 miles.
    Torn burn 900kcal when walking and you are 170lbs you'd need to walk 17.6 miles.

    @yirara do multiply it times my weight?

    Yes, 0.3 times "weight in pounds" times "distance in miles"
    Thus for example 0.3 times 170 (pounds) times 5 (miles)

    @yirara I did notice I have a distance thing on my treadmill I dont even look at the cals cuz its a foreign treadmill so its like Kg or some crap.

    Could that "crap" be km, kilometres?
    It's a very common unit of measurement.

    @yirara i think so - says 67 kg after a half hour. Usually tread at the gym will actuallg say CALS
  • ceiswyn
    ceiswyn Posts: 2,256 Member
    yirara wrote: »
    yirara wrote: »
    Do look at your calorie burns for sport again. Given your calorie goal you don't seem to be too heavy. To calculate how much calories you burn walking you use 0.3*weight in lbs*distance walked in miles.
    So for the sake of it I just use 200lbs weight.
    To burn 900kcal walking you'd need to walk 15 miles.
    Torn burn 900kcal when walking and you are 170lbs you'd need to walk 17.6 miles.

    @yirara do multiply it times my weight?

    Yes, 0.3 times "weight in pounds" times "distance in miles"
    Thus for example 0.3 times 170 (pounds) times 5 (miles)

    @yirara I did notice I have a distance thing on my treadmill I dont even look at the cals cuz its a foreign treadmill so its like Kg or some crap.

    Could that "crap" be km, kilometres?
    It's a very common unit of measurement.

    @yirara i think so - says 67 kg after a half hour. Usually tread at the gym will actuallg say CALS

    I bet it isn't saying 'kg' :)