We are pleased to announce that as of March 4, 2025, an updated Rich Text Editor has been introduced in the MyFitnessPal Community. To learn more about the changes, please click here. We look forward to sharing this new feature with you!

MATADOR

kaypee65
kaypee65 Posts: 120 Member
edited December 2024 in Health and Weight Loss
Has anyone else tried the MATADOR protocol? Minimizing adaptive thermogenesis and deactivating obesity rebound. It was a small study, but the data were compelling. Two weeks of calorie restriction, then two weeks of maintenance. I'm six weeks in so far and am seeing some interesting data. I am pretty good with my tracking, but sm still losing much faster than predicted in my model.

I am not keto, vegetarian, or any other restrictive protocol. But I do try to ensure I get at keast 21 g of fiber daily.

https://www.nature.com/articles/ijo2017206

Replies

  • AnnPT77
    AnnPT77 Posts: 35,486 Member
    No. But in to say this: It's wonderful that you're losing faster than predicted. I did the same - dangerously so, until I course-corrected - just eating at a calorie deficit with my regular foods. The so-called "calorie calculators" just provide statistical estimates of calorie requirements: They're close for most, further off for a few.

    It's possible that the protocol is yielding your better than expected results . . . but it's also possible that you're one of the people whose calorie expenditure is more than your demographics would predict. Hard to know for sure, with n=1 experiments.

    Either way, though, being able to eat more, while still losing at a sensible rate, is a nice thing. Wishing you much success as you go along, and looking forward to hearing a longer term "case report" on your experience with this interesting protocol as time moves on. (I can think of psychological reasons that it might be a good approach for some people, even beyond any 'metabolic' ones.)

    Best wishes!
  • This content has been removed.
  • HelenWater
    HelenWater Posts: 232 Member
    I started the two week at 67% of maintenance alternating with two weeks of maintenance energy intake at the beginning of this week. The science looks good, and it seems easier than the 5:2 etc type of diets.
This discussion has been closed.