Confused: Calories or Carbs or Combination for weight loss..

QueenofCaffeine4Life
QueenofCaffeine4Life Posts: 88 Member
edited December 2024 in Health and Weight Loss
I was trying to find a thread regarding calories counted verses carb restriction for weight loss. I am just too lazy to go through the 1000+ discussions. So I thought I would start my own.

So...help me out. Do you watch calories and carbs? Count calories only? Or do you simply cut out carbs?

I had been watching my calories and carbs and fat. I am tired of counting it all. I would really like to find a balance in this weight loss journey. So far I have lost about 26lbs since May 1.
I have about 50 more to go until I am done.

Replies

  • lemurcat2
    lemurcat2 Posts: 7,887 Member
    Calories are what matter for weight loss. Some people find that if they cut carbs very low they will naturally eat fewer cals, at least in the short term. Many who cut carbs also count calories and find lower carbs help them stick to those calories.

    What I did, back when I started, was pick a calorie goal (using MFP) and a protein goal, and then I adjusted my other macros to make sense with the protein goal (it was basically 40-30-30). But I didn't worry about the other macros, I just focused on protein, calories, and eating an overall healthful diet (I watched fiber until I was confident I was generally at or over my goal). Pretty quickly I just naturally knew how to eat to hit my protein goal, so it wasn't like I was worrying about it daily, and similarly, I fell into a pattern where I knew what to eat for my calorie goal.
  • LyndaBSS
    LyndaBSS Posts: 6,964 Member
    You want to be in a calorie deficit to lose weight.

    There's no need to restrict carbs or anything else from your diet unless it's medically necessary.

    Good luck!
  • DaddieCat
    DaddieCat Posts: 3,643 Member
    psychod787 wrote: »
    Ok.... Here is the deal. Low Carb Diets work. So do high carb diets. Modified Keto diets do several things. First, they increase protein. Protein fills people up and keeps them fuller. Second, there does seem to be s slight appetite blunting effect on Ketosis. Third, and the biggest issue I believe, is it eliminates many of the energy dense, hyper palatable foods from the your diet. We can go to the other extreme. Look at whole food vegans. Many of them are super slim. Again, it eliminates a macro and reward value. I mean unless you are eating a lot of nuts or dried nuts, its hard NOT to lose weight on the food they eat! JMHO.....

    I am not a whole food vegan, but I've definitely been a fat vegan before. Just throwing that out there.
  • sijomial
    sijomial Posts: 19,809 Member
    Yesterday I ate a big carby breakfast and for the next 5hrs ate 60 - 90g of carbs an hour.
    After I finished my bike ride I recovered with more carbs.
    For dinner I had quite a lot more carbs.

    OP - have a guess why I would have had a net loss of bodyfat despite all those carbs and the answer to your question will become apparent as to what is important for weight loss.

    How/what you intend to eat when you get to goal weight and want to maintain that weight long term is well worth considering while you are losing.
  • QueenofCaffeine4Life
    QueenofCaffeine4Life Posts: 88 Member
    kimny72 wrote: »
    Calories are what actually determine whether you lose weight or not, so if I were only going to track one thing, it would be calories.

    Macros can affect satiety and compliance, and minimums are required for health and some fitness goals. Regardless they are just guidelines, it's not like you are expected or need to hit them on the head.

    Having said that, I'm not sure what extra effort is required in tracking your macros? I guess if you are trying to get them exactly right? If that's the case, then don't worry about that. I look at my calorie goal as my primary goal, to stay at or under. I look at protein and fiber as minimums I try to exceed, but I don't sweat it. The rest I rarely look at, other than for curiosity's sake.

    I eat around 50% carbs, so cutting them out isn't an option for me, and eating this way hasn't hindered me at all. :smile:

    I was doing Medi Weight Loss. We were only required to track protein in calories. The diet limited fats and other micronutrients to very bare minimums. When I said I was tired of tracking, that is what I meant. Having to worry about only have two tiny fats a day- such as a thumb size serving of nuts, or a teaspoon of olive oil, etc... I really would like to have a caloric goal and then hit that or stay under, ya know?
  • kimny72
    kimny72 Posts: 16,011 Member
    becklorik wrote: »
    kimny72 wrote: »
    Calories are what actually determine whether you lose weight or not, so if I were only going to track one thing, it would be calories.

    Macros can affect satiety and compliance, and minimums are required for health and some fitness goals. Regardless they are just guidelines, it's not like you are expected or need to hit them on the head.

    Having said that, I'm not sure what extra effort is required in tracking your macros? I guess if you are trying to get them exactly right? If that's the case, then don't worry about that. I look at my calorie goal as my primary goal, to stay at or under. I look at protein and fiber as minimums I try to exceed, but I don't sweat it. The rest I rarely look at, other than for curiosity's sake.

    I eat around 50% carbs, so cutting them out isn't an option for me, and eating this way hasn't hindered me at all. :smile:

    I was doing Medi Weight Loss. We were only required to track protein in calories. The diet limited fats and other micronutrients to very bare minimums. When I said I was tired of tracking, that is what I meant. Having to worry about only have two tiny fats a day- such as a thumb size serving of nuts, or a teaspoon of olive oil, etc... I really would like to have a caloric goal and then hit that or stay under, ya know?

    Sure! So you don't have to be that specific to lose weight, you don't even have to be that specific to track a bunch of different things. You certainly don't need to set anything to a "bare minimum" if you don't want to. Maybe use the MFP settings, and if the protein goal MFP gives you is lower than you're accustomed to, change the percentages a little to get them where you want them. Then just use them as a loose guide, that you pay attention to but don't really stress about. Or ignore them all entirely and just look at calories. Or just calories and protein. You get the point :smiley: The calories are the key.
  • psychod787
    psychod787 Posts: 4,099 Member
    MikePTY wrote: »
    psychod787 wrote: »
    Ok.... Here is the deal. Low Carb Diets work. So do high carb diets. Modified Keto diets do several things. First, they increase protein. Protein fills people up and keeps them fuller. Second, there does seem to be s slight appetite blunting effect on Ketosis. Third, and the biggest issue I believe, is it eliminates many of the energy dense, hyper palatable foods from the your diet. We can go to the other extreme. Look at whole food vegans. Many of them are super slim. Again, it eliminates a macro and reward value. I mean unless you are eating a lot of nuts or dried nuts, its hard NOT to lose weight on the food they eat! JMHO.....

    I'm not sure I entirely agree with this. There are fat vegans and fat Ketoers. At the end of the day, it all comes down to calorie deficit. Some people will find the type of foods that those people eat to be more filling and make it easier to control their appetites. But for others, it doesn't work that way. That's why we see a lot of "Keto didn't work for me" and "Vegan here, need to lose X pounds" posts.

    I also want to mention dietary adherence.... It tends to be poor in the long term. I have people I work with, purely observational data mind you, that swear, "I CANT LOSE WEIGHT ON X DIET!" Well, if they are Keto, seems to be the trend at my work these days, you see them go head first into a pie or "insert high energy density/ high reward food here" To quote a hero of mine, James Krieger, " A flexible dietary approach that trends for lower calorie dense/ lower reward food tends to be a good dietary approach for long term loss and maintenance. High energy dense/ reward foods should be limited."
  • J72FIT
    J72FIT Posts: 6,021 Member
    edited July 2019
    Energy balance.

    Energy in > Energy out = Weight Gain
    Energy in = Energy out = Maintenance
    Energy in < Energy out = Weight Loss

    I substituted calories for energy. I find often using the word calories confuses people...
  • QueenofCaffeine4Life
    QueenofCaffeine4Life Posts: 88 Member
    I really do appreciate all of your input. It has been very helpful. Sometimes just talking it all out helps.
  • pontious11349
    pontious11349 Posts: 105 Member
    oh and don't drink your calories unless that is your indulgence (like a flavoured latter or something). :)
  • QueenofCaffeine4Life
    QueenofCaffeine4Life Posts: 88 Member
    @pontious11349
    I love this....
    When I enjoy cake I simply make sure I go back to my clean diet straight after. No day long / week long / month long binges.

    Whats the catch: Well. You just need to be prepared to wait longer for your results. No massive drops in weight. Just a slow, steady, sustainable journey to the body I want

    You are so right! I have finally come to terms with not wanting to lose ALL THE WEIGHT in a few months. Rather just lose as I make the right choices and do the right things. It will make my life a lot easier!!!




  • J72FIT
    J72FIT Posts: 6,021 Member
    @becklorik: hallelujah for you have cracked it.

    The key is sustainability. Who hand on heart believes they want to spend the rest of their days weighing foods, counting carbs, logging on MFP. I know I sure as *kitten* dont.

    I found it liberating to just cut out all all this complications and focus only on eating "healthy" most of the time and then still having cake / beer / whatever when it presents itself. Never actively seeking it out really.

    For healthy eating I make sure I eat a lot of veg at meals with some source of protein and snack only on fruits / nuts. No weighing - no guilt. Nobody ever got fat and blamed the almonds or blamed the watermelon!!!!!!

    When I enjoy cake I simply make sure I go back to my clean diet straight after. No day long / week long / month long binges.

    Whats the catch: Well. You just need to be prepared to wait longer for your results. No massive drops in weight. Just a slow, steady, sustainable journey to the body I want.

    I fully believe we are over complicating things, and @becklorik I felt compelled to share with you where I am at as it sounds so similar to what you were describing above.

    Best of luck to you



    Love this post!
  • pontious11349
    pontious11349 Posts: 105 Member
    becklorik wrote: »
    @pontious11349
    Rather just lose as I make the right choices and do the right things. It will make my life a lot easier!!!

    yip simple. and change will come. there is 6.5 months between the 2 photos in my profile pic which isnt a great deal of time in the grand scheme of things.

    also my wider family friends don't see me weighing stuff or refusing cakes at party or any other habits which they find weird. its all so much easier when you just eat clean most of the time.

    I think the industry makes money over complicating things.
  • QueenofCaffeine4Life
    QueenofCaffeine4Life Posts: 88 Member
    becklorik wrote: »
    @pontious11349


    I think the industry makes money over complicating things.
    TRUTH!!! Absolute truth! I have said so many times that ANY and EVERY DIET works as long as you work it. So best not to diet and just eat in moderation.
  • paperpudding
    paperpudding Posts: 9,321 Member
    Striving to eat clean is also over complicating things though.

    There is no need to do that unless you like that way of eating.


    Bottom line for weight loss : just calories.


    Of course you can focus on nutrition too and satiety etc - but bottom line: just calories.

This discussion has been closed.