Difference in calories burned on websites
shorerider
Posts: 3,817 Member
I was checking how many calories I burn on my bike rides, and I noticed that there is a difference in the amount depending on what website I checked. MFP tends to be on the low side it seems, sometimes differing as much as 150 calories from other sites. Is there a reason?
I'm still keeping up riding an hour a day and burning up anywhere from 900 to a little over a 1000 calories, according to MFP, and most days I have a hard time eating the calories to keep up with the plan; so I'm not seeking to get more calories to eat but am just curious. And, who knows---there is a McDonald's within riding distance; one day I might stop by there for sundae treat during my ride and there's "missing" 150 calories might just come in handy!
I'm still keeping up riding an hour a day and burning up anywhere from 900 to a little over a 1000 calories, according to MFP, and most days I have a hard time eating the calories to keep up with the plan; so I'm not seeking to get more calories to eat but am just curious. And, who knows---there is a McDonald's within riding distance; one day I might stop by there for sundae treat during my ride and there's "missing" 150 calories might just come in handy!
0
Replies
-
I was checking how many calories I burn on my bike rides, and I noticed that there is a difference in the amount depending on what website I checked. MFP tends to be on the low side it seems, sometimes differing as much as 150 calories from other sites. Is there a reason?
I'm still keeping up riding an hour a day and burning up anywhere from 900 to a little over a 1000 calories, according to MFP, and most days I have a hard time eating the calories to keep up with the plan; so I'm not seeking to get more calories to eat but am just curious. And, who knows---there is a McDonald's within riding distance; one day I might stop by there for sundae treat during my ride and there's "missing" 150 calories might just come in handy!0 -
YIKES! I just found one site that said I burned almost 200 calories LESS than what MFP says I did. But, I think I might have discovered why--it had less choices for speed and distance. I guess that might be it.
However, that brings me to another question--if I'm only averaging about 10-12 miles per hour, MFP (and most other sites) call that a "light effort." But it's not light to me! Especially if I'm pushing into the wind like we've had here the last few days--today there was a 10-15 mph wind I was fighting most of my ride. How can I account for that, if at all? Is it simple as just saying I put out a moderate or even vigorous effort even if my MPH didn't match up?0 -
That's why it's really just an estimate. To truely know, you need a heart rate monitor.0
-
Do you have any good suggestions on brands? I've looked at quite a few, but the price range is crazy huge! My husband isn't thrilled about me seeking this device and would much rather purchase something else for that amount of money :grumble:
I saw that the least inexpensive was about $30, but read horrible reviews. ANy advice would be appreciated.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.8K Introduce Yourself
- 43.9K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 176K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 428 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153.1K Motivation and Support
- 8.1K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 15 News and Announcements
- 1.2K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions