We are pleased to announce that on March 4, 2025, an updated Rich Text Editor will be introduced in the MyFitnessPal Community. To learn more about the upcoming changes, please click here. We look forward to sharing this new feature with you!

Difference in calories burned on websites

shorerider
shorerider Posts: 3,817 Member
edited September 2024 in Fitness and Exercise
I was checking how many calories I burn on my bike rides, and I noticed that there is a difference in the amount depending on what website I checked. MFP tends to be on the low side it seems, sometimes differing as much as 150 calories from other sites. Is there a reason?

I'm still keeping up riding an hour a day and burning up anywhere from 900 to a little over a 1000 calories, according to MFP, and most days I have a hard time eating the calories to keep up with the plan; so I'm not seeking to get more calories to eat but am just curious. And, who knows---there is a McDonald's within riding distance; one day I might stop by there for sundae treat during my ride and there's "missing" 150 calories might just come in handy!

Replies

  • shorerider
    shorerider Posts: 3,817 Member
    I was checking how many calories I burn on my bike rides, and I noticed that there is a difference in the amount depending on what website I checked. MFP tends to be on the low side it seems, sometimes differing as much as 150 calories from other sites. Is there a reason?

    I'm still keeping up riding an hour a day and burning up anywhere from 900 to a little over a 1000 calories, according to MFP, and most days I have a hard time eating the calories to keep up with the plan; so I'm not seeking to get more calories to eat but am just curious. And, who knows---there is a McDonald's within riding distance; one day I might stop by there for sundae treat during my ride and there's "missing" 150 calories might just come in handy!
  • shorerider
    shorerider Posts: 3,817 Member
    YIKES! I just found one site that said I burned almost 200 calories LESS than what MFP says I did. But, I think I might have discovered why--it had less choices for speed and distance. I guess that might be it.

    However, that brings me to another question--if I'm only averaging about 10-12 miles per hour, MFP (and most other sites) call that a "light effort." But it's not light to me! Especially if I'm pushing into the wind like we've had here the last few days--today there was a 10-15 mph wind I was fighting most of my ride. How can I account for that, if at all? Is it simple as just saying I put out a moderate or even vigorous effort even if my MPH didn't match up?
  • banks1850
    banks1850 Posts: 3,475 Member
    That's why it's really just an estimate. To truely know, you need a heart rate monitor.
  • hamilton4beaumont
    hamilton4beaumont Posts: 122 Member
    Do you have any good suggestions on brands? I've looked at quite a few, but the price range is crazy huge! My husband isn't thrilled about me seeking this device and would much rather purchase something else for that amount of money :grumble:
    I saw that the least inexpensive was about $30, but read horrible reviews. ANy advice would be appreciated.
This discussion has been closed.