Strength to size standards?
Options

duteshredded
Posts: 32 Member
What numbers would you say you should be hitting on the main compounds to be able to have a decently muscular physique?
1
Replies
-
Strength and size are not so neatly related as you may think.
Have a look at this get a start on gauging your strength against some benchmarks but everyone is going to be different.
https://strengthlevel.com/strength-standards0 -
giancarlov1191 wrote: »Strength and size are not so neatly related as you may think.
Have a look at this get a start on gauging your strength against some benchmarks but everyone is going to be different.
https://strengthlevel.com/strength-standards
Just seen a lot that as a natural strength and size are equated so was just wondering0 -
Well you could pass as decently muscular so have a look and see where you stack up.
I see a lot of other guys that seem to have less developed muscles than I do but can lift way heavier so I really don't think there's much value in comparing.1 -
There isn't a answer that is universal.
I had more than a decent body both when I could only squat 95bs and when I could squat 500lbs.
Strength does not translate to musculature aesthetics equally. Nor does a number matter unless you plan to or currently compete.
Just train.4 -
This content has been removed.
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 396.5K Introduce Yourself
- 44.2K Getting Started
- 260.8K Health and Weight Loss
- 176.3K Food and Nutrition
- 47.6K Recipes
- 232.8K Fitness and Exercise
- 449 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.7K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153.3K Motivation and Support
- 8.3K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.5K Chit-Chat
- 2.6K Fun and Games
- 4.5K MyFitnessPal Information
- 16 News and Announcements
- 18 MyFitnessPal Academy
- 1.4K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 3K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions