Can’t lose weight on 1200 cal per day
shezian
Posts: 9 Member
I am 49 years old and going through menapause and l have to eat 900 per day to lose weight and exercise at least 3 times per week. Anyone else have the same problem? I weigh everything and do not eat back my exercise calories, l usually lose weight on lite n easy 5 days of 1200 calories per day spread over a week and normally lose about 1/2 kilo per week, but last time l did this for 2 months l only lost 2 kilos. I was so disappointed as that was the only thing that worked! I’m about to give up! I am 153cm tall and 63 kilo. I would like to lose 5 kilos.
3
Replies
-
No, because no one should have to eat 900 calories a day to lose weight.
How are you determining how much you are eating? Do you use a food scale?12 -
You should try dropping sugar. It's It can be done. It's more work but it can be done. Only have fruits if you need something sweet. No agave no stevia,ect. Try this for a two weeks and let me know how it goes. NO CHEATING! 😁👍💪2
-
Yes l weigh everything.0
-
Okay, what about your diary entries? Are you using usda entries and nutritional information from the packaging?7
-
What's your height and weight, and how much are you trying to lose?8
-
If you're only wanting to lose about 10 lbs set your activity level, set your weight loss goal to .5 lbs a week, and eat back your exercise calories. Eating 900 calories a day is dangerous and unhealthy.9
-
I'm 4'9 and now maintaining under 100 pounds. If I were only eating 900 calories a day I'd be losing 1 pound a week, assuming I did no intentional walking. You either have a metabolism which is REALLY up the creek (which is very unlikely but worth checking out for reassurance)) or your logging is inaccurate and you are eating much more than you think you are.14 -
No, I don't find that, at age 64. I admit, I'm a good li'l ol' calorie burner - despite being long since past menopausal, severely hypothyroid, sedentary outside of intentional exercise and all that jazz. But I'm losing gradually now on 1850 net calories, at about 0.5lb/week average, just as I'd predict from experience. (I am 165 cm, 59kg.) 1200 calories (plus exercise!) tried to make me sick. Can't imagine 900.
Five kilos isn't much to lose - it will be slow, or at least should be slow, like .25kg/week. A weight-trending app, and a lot of patience, might be helpful. Quick is unlikely.8 -
Gosh there must be something wrong with me then. What do you mean blood work? What am looking for in blood tests? My thyroid is fine, My tracking is perfect I double triple check everything. I’m hungry all the time but l have no other choice but to starve myself to get my weight down. It’s terribly draining. I really thought it was because lm getting older. Thinking of seeing an endocrinologist, not sure if she will be able to help. I think it’s my hormones. My heights is 153cm, weight 63 kilos. I’m 49.6
-
Gosh there must be something wrong with me then. What do you mean blood work? What am looking for in blood tests? My thyroid is fine, My tracking is perfect I double triple check everything. I’m hungry all the time but l have no other choice but to starve myself to get my weight down. It’s terribly draining. I really thought it was because lm getting older. Thinking of seeing an endocrinologist, not sure if she will be able to help. I think it’s my hormones. My heights is 153cm, weight 63 kilos. I’m 49.
You have lots of options besides starving yourself. Your heart is a muscle and at 900 calories a day you aren't feeding it. If you are hungry eat.12 -
How about you make your diary public while waiting for a doctors appointment? Others may be able to spot common logging errors. People are convinced their logging is on point here all the time when it actually isn't. I am still well aware of how bad I was when I started doing this, thinking I too was being really accurate.13
-
Your weight is already low and you only want to lose a little bit. Losing 1kg per month is normal there! Just accept that it will take time. But you have to fuel your body properly. Your body can only lose a certain amount of fat per day. Once that amount is gone your body munches away on your muscles. This is bad in two respects: a) your heart is a muscle b) osteoporosis. Muscles keep your bones healthy. If you lose muscles your bones will lose strength, and at your age it will be very difficult to build new muscles. Thus slow down, eat properly, preserve your muscles. You need them!12
-
What exercise do you do? I only ask because I wonder if strength training might be an option for you? (there are those on this forum who are more knowledgeable than me on this who might advise better). I just wonder if it might help to start building a body frame you are happier with and resistance exercise is beneficial as we age....9
-
You could consider increasing your intake to 1200 so it is easier to sustain. You will lose your 5kg more slowly but hopefully you'll feel less hungry and, once the weight is off, it'll stay off. Good luck - I'm sure you can do it!6
-
Last year I wanted to lose 10-15 pounds. I am barely still 54 and hard to believe perimenopausal, and certifiably hormonally screwed up as verified by my doctors. I was eating the recommended 1200 calories for the first month and began tracking my calories. After reading so much wonderful advice on this site I bought a scale. I weighed everything and was shocked at the discrepancies always to the plus side. I also thought I was eating a lot of protein and was shocked to find I was only averaging 45 g a day. I am very active, and from what I learned on this site I doubled my protein, ate my exercise calories back and magically started losing weight. I had started taking a body pump class and was struggling - as soon as I added the protein I started to also become stronger. I have lost 12 pounds and then became lazy with logging and gained 4 back. Now Back to the grindstone... Good Luck to you!
19 -
Gosh there must be something wrong with me then. What do you mean blood work? What am looking for in blood tests? My thyroid is fine, My tracking is perfect I double triple check everything. I’m hungry all the time but l have no other choice but to starve myself to get my weight down. It’s terribly draining. I really thought it was because lm getting older. Thinking of seeing an endocrinologist, not sure if she will be able to help. I think it’s my hormones. My heights is 153cm, weight 63 kilos. I’m 49.
Would you be willing to temporarily make your diary public? It would really help. Otherwise all we can tell you is your numbers are way out of whack somewhere - either there is some issue with your logging or something medically off that a doctor would need to determine.
*
*
I noticed something I didn't catch the first time reading your OP:<snip> but last time l did this for 2 months l only lost 2 kilos. I was so disappointed as that was the only thing that worked! I’m about to give up! I am 153cm tall and 63 kilo. I would like to lose 5 kilos.
Losing 2 kilos in 2 months is a rate of 0.5lbs per week. Considering you are on the shorter side, and are only slightly overweight, that is a perfectly fine rate of loss. How long have you been eating so little? It could be possible that drastically undereating in an effort to lose weight fast is messing with your hormones and causing water retention and fatigue causing you to exert yourself less without realizing lowering your calories burned.15 -
Shezian, I'm a couple of cm taller than you, my starting weight wasn't much more than you are now and I'm a couple of years older. I'm passed the menopause. It took me over 6 months to lose 5kg, eating 1200 calories a day PLUS my exercise calories. It took me a further 8 months to lose another 5kg. I'm now in maintenance.
You say you're always hungry- the simple answer is to eat more. Put your stats in to the MFP set up screen. Select the smallest rate loss possible. Eat the number of calories allocated (probably 1200) plus your exercise calories. Don't be miserable on 900 calories which will ultimately make you very very ill.
You only want to lose 5kg - expect it to take a long time. Ignore all the adverts you ever see about losing lots of weight really quickly. That's usually water weight in the first instance - and the methods don't lead to long term eating plans that maintain the lower weight.6 -
Ok thanks so much for your advise, but the thing is when l eat 1200 calories per day l am not losing hence why l am eating at 900 cal per day. That’s the only way l actually lose any weight.1
-
Ok thanks so much for your advise, but the thing is when l eat 1200 calories per day l am not losing hence why l am eating at 900 cal per day. That’s the only way l actually lose any weight.
What do YOU define and how do you MEASURE "actually losing any weight"?
Here is what 11.1lbs = 5.035kg in 260 days on an average effective deficit of -150 Cal a day looks like.
In order for you NOT to be able to achieve this while eating 1200, your TDEE would have to be below 1350.
5 -
If you are eating 900 calories a day and still not losing any weight. What kind of exercising are you doing? How many minutes or hour per day to you exercise? What kind of food are you eating? I will tell you this... If I eat 900 calories per day. I need to burn 1200 calories in order to lose weight. If you do not burn more calories then what you ate, you will not lose weight. Another thing is what type of food are you eating at 900 calories everyday? And type of exercise are you doing? In the end you got to put more work into exercising to burn more. Hope this helps. Good Luck.0
-
@shezian I'm quoting again what I wrote above:
...slow down, eat properly, preserve your muscles. You need them!
Why do you think losing muscle, increasing the risk of getting osteoporosis and looking flabby is worth a quick change on the scale? Think about that.
Plus, you've not answered the question yet what means that you've not lost anything, and how you measure your food intake. Opening up your diary would really help in finding out where things go wrong.11 -
In addition to the above, are you sure you're selecting accurate entries in the database? Some are notoriously wrong. Many aren't up-to-date as products change but not everyone checks / updates the entries.
I know it's hard. Being short and close to goal weight, our maintenance calories aren't much higher than the minimum recommended amount of 1200. I now get 1340 in maintenance. When I was losing weight, it didn't take too many incorrect entries or an inaccurate measurement or an overestimation of my exercise burn, to wipe out that 130 deficit. However, as has been said repeatedly, under-eating is really not good.
Sharing your diary will allow more experienced people to look for potential flaws.7 -
Ok thanks so much for your advise, but the thing is when l eat 1200 calories per day l am not losing hence why l am eating at 900 cal per day. That’s the only way l actually lose any weight.
The thing is, how much weight per week are you expecting to lose?
1/2 pound a week would be the range you should be looking at. This can be easily masked by water weight fluctuations. https://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/10683010/the-weird-and-highly-annoying-world-of-scale-fluctuations
1/2 pound a week is only a 250 calorie deficit each day. Your logging has to be very accurate, and your activity level needs to be at least what you signed up for.5 -
megalodon182014 wrote: »If you are eating 900 calories a day and still not losing any weight. What kind of exercising are you doing? How many minutes or hour per day to you exercise? What kind of food are you eating? I will tell you this... If I eat 900 calories per day. I need to burn 1200 calories in order to lose weight. If you do not burn more calories then what you ate, you will not lose weight. Another thing is what type of food are you eating at 900 calories everyday? And type of exercise are you doing? In the end you got to put more work into exercising to burn more. Hope this helps. Good Luck.
Whoa........there is some serious confusion/misinformation here.
BMR = basal metabolic rate. The number of calories you burn if you stayed in bed all day.
Add 10%, 20%, 30%, etc. for your activity level. Example - a sedentary person would typically get 10% on top of BMR. That number is called NEAT (non-exercise activity thermogenesis).
If you did ZERO deliberate exercise, and you ate less than your NEAT calories........you would lose weight.
What type of exercise are you doing (how many hours of exercise?) gives you that 1200 calorie burn? How can you exercise day in and day out with 900 calories of fuel.
If you are really doing this, you are torching lean muscle at an alarming rate.7 -
Shezian, it's important to know that, being short and not actually overweight, it takes time to lose weight.
As TeaBea says, your body needs a set number of calories, just to survive. Activity on top of that requires more calories. With an activity level of 'Sedentary', that's what MFP would have as your maintenance figure - the number of calories to stay at your current weight. A higher activity level requires more calories to maintain your current weight.
The general advice, for people who don't have much to lose, is to set MFP to the lowest weight loss rate of half a pound (0.25kg) a week, which works out to be a deficit of 250 calories off your maintenance number.
HOWEVER, the minimum that MFP will allow is 1200 calories. Eating below that, unless under strict medical supervision, is really really not recommended unless you actually want to make yourself very ill.
Using my current figures as an example (as I've said before, our starting stats are not dissimilar).
My maintenance figure is 1340 calories.
To lose 0.25kg a week, I'd need to be eating 1090 calories a day. That's below the minimum so I'd be set 1200.
My deficit is therefore only 140.
No matter what rate loss I select in MFP, I'd still be set 1200 calories, I'd still only have a deficit of 140 and I'd therefore only be losing at 0.12kg a week. It would take 8 weeks to lose 1kg.
At such a small deficit, it doesn't take much to blow it if your weighing and logging aren't accurate. It also doesn't take much water weight or bloating from your monthly cycle to mask any loss. Weigh yourself weekly as a tracking mechanism but be aware that weight goes up an down a little, naturally, and don't be surprised if you don't see any clear change for a while.
I was 68kg when I started on MFP. I can't remember what my maintenance calories figure was back then, but I was allocated 1200 calories and perhaps did have a deficit of 250 at that point. As I lost weight, the number of calories my body needed to maintain that new weight went down. I was still allocated 1200 calories which meant my deficit kept getting smaller and smaller and the weight loss rate got similarly smaller. It took a long time, but I'm now at 53kg and have switched to maintenance.
You CAN lose weight without starving yourself or making yourself ill, but it'll take time and you need to be realistic about that. Don't believe the hype or the ads you see on TV or in magazines as you don't have a lot to lose to start with.
(Also, make sure you eat your exercise calories, otherwise your net figure will be below the 1200 minimum).4
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions